Abstract
Uplift prediction concerns the causal impact of a treatment over individuals and it has attracted a lot of attention in the machine learning community these past years. In this paper, we consider a typical situation where the learner has access to an imbalanced treatment and control data collection affecting the performance of the existing approaches. Inspired from transfer and multi-task learning paradigms, our approach overcomes this problem by sharing the feature representation of observations. Furthermore, we provide a unified framework for the existing evaluation metrics and discuss their merits. Our experimental results, over a large-scale collection show the benefits of the proposed approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
this dataset will be released shortly at http://research.criteo.com/outreach.
References
Chapelle, O., Manavoglu, E., Rosales, R.: Simple and scalable response prediction for display advertising. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 5(4), 61:1–61:34 (2014)
Hillstrom, K.: The MineThatData e-mail analytics and data mining challenge (2008)
Jaskowski, M., Jaroszewicz, S.: Uplift modeling for clinical trial data. In: ICML Workshop on Clinical Data Analysis (2012)
Kuusisto, F., Costa, V.S., Nassif, H., Burnside, E., Page, D., Shavlik, J.: Support vector machines for differential prediction. In: Calders, T., Esposito, F., Hüllermeier, E., Meo, R. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8725, pp. 50–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44851-9_4
Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)
Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)
Radcliffe, N.J.: Using control groups to target on predicted lift: building and assessing uplift model. Direct Mark. Anal. J. 3, 14–21 (2007)
Radcliffe, N.J., Surry, P.D.: Real-world uplift modelling with significance-based uplift trees (2011)
Read, J., Pfahringer, B., Holmes, G., Frank, E.: Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Mach. Learn. 85(3), 333 (2011)
Rzepakowski, P., Jaroszewicz, S.: Decision trees for uplift modeling with single and multiple treatments. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 32, 303–327 (2012)
Jaroszewicz, S.S.M., Rzepakowski, P.: Ensemble methods for uplift modeling. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 29(6), 1531–1559 (2015)
Tufféry, S.: Data Mining and Statistics for Decision Making (2011)
Zaniewicz, L., Jaroszewicz, S.: Support vector machines for uplift modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW 2013, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 131–138 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Betlei, A., Diemert, E., Amini, MR. (2018). Uplift Prediction with Dependent Feature Representation in Imbalanced Treatment and Control Conditions. In: Cheng, L., Leung, A., Ozawa, S. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11305. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04221-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04221-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04220-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04221-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)