Skip to main content

Field Guide for Interpreting Engineering Team Behavior with Sensor Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Systems Design & Management (CSD&M 2018)

Abstract

The design of complex systems is a challenge with many capabilities enabled by a recent generation of digital tools for modeling, simulation, and interaction. Relevant studies on teamwork from coordination science, learning, design, HCI, and serious games are briefly summarized. However, validation of resulting behavior and emergent outcomes given these much-needed new tools has been difficult. The recent availability of pervasive sensors may allow the creation of experiment platforms to increase empirical data from experiments, their scalability, and analyses towards reproducibility. This paper’s approach treats engineering teamwork as a sociotechnical system and proposes instrumentation of teamwork across problem, solution, and social spaces. A quasi-experiment was conducted, with experts in the maritime industry exploring options for transition to natural gas infrastructure and shipping. The experiment derives a narrative of the engineering teamwork both from ethnography and digital sensors to uncover teamwork behavior. Thus, this work integrates disparate data to create mapping rules from sensors to story. We find the approach promising for the generation of sensor-derived stories and the potential for deeper and scalable studies on engineering teamwork.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hirshorn, S.R., Voss, L.D., Bromley, L.K.: NASA Systems Engineering Handbook (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Malone, T.W., Bernstein, M.S.: Handbook of Collective Intelligence. MIT Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Woolley, A.W., Chabris, C.F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., Malone, T.W.: Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 686–688 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malone, T.W., Laubacher, R., Dellarocas, C.: The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 51(3), 21 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moser, H.A.: Systems Engineering, Systems Thinking, and Learning: A Case Study in Space Industry. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolb, D.: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross, A.N.: Knowledge creation and learning through conversation: a longitudinal case study of a design project (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schon, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, vol. 1. Basic Books, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Valkenburg, R.: The Reflective Practice in Product Design Teams (Ph.D. thesis). Delft University of Technology, Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 1, 14 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Engeström, Y.: Learning by Expanding. Cambridge University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stompff, G., Smulders, F., Henze, L.: Surprises are the benefits: reframing in multidisciplinary design teams. Des. Stud. 47, 187–214 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carrizosa, K., Eris, Ö., Milne, A., Mabogunje, A.: Building the design observatory: a core instrument for design research. In DS 30: Proceedings of DESIGN 2002, the 7th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, pp. 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  14. Milne, A., Winograd, T.: The iLoft project: a technologically advanced collaborative design workspace as research instrument. In: DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 2003, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, pp. 315–316 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Törlind, P., Sonalkar, N., Bergström, M., Blanco, E., Hicks, B., McAlpine, H.: Lessons learned and future challenges for design observatory research. In DS 58-2: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, vol. 2, Design Theory and Research Methodology, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24–27 August 2009

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, M.C.: Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Res. Eng. Des. 20(1), 1–11 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen, M.A., Dietz, A.S., Yang, T., Priebe, C.E., Pronovost, P.J.: An integrative framework for sensor-based measurement of teamwork in healthcare. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22(1), 11–18 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baecker, R., Grudin, J., Buxton, W., Greenberg, S., Chui, M.: Readings in human-computer interaction, towards year 2000. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 18(2), 187–188 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson, P.: Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An Introduction. Springer Science & Business Media (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johansen, R.: Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. The Free Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., Zambrano, J.: From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. Int. J. Comput. Supp. Collab. Learn. 1–21 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grogan, P.T., de Weck, O.L.: Collaborative design in the sustainable infrastructure planning game. In: Society for Computer Simulation International, p. 4 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moser, B., Mori, K., Suzuki, H., Kimura, F.: Global product development based on activity models with coordination distance features. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, pp. 161–166 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moser, B.R., Wood, R.T.: Design of complex programs as sociotechnical systems. In: Concurrent Engineering in the 21st Century, pp. 197–220. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Argyris, C.: Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Bus. Rev. 5, 115–125 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Duhigg, C.: What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team. NY Times Magazine, 26 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pelegrin, L.: Teamwork Phenomena: Exploring Path Dependency and Learning in Teams during Architectural Design of Sustainable Maritime Shipping Systems [Master of Science in Engineering and Management]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Moser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pelegrin, L., Moser, B., Wanaka, S., Chavy-Macdonald, MA., Winder, I. (2019). Field Guide for Interpreting Engineering Team Behavior with Sensor Data. In: Bonjour, E., Krob, D., Palladino, L., Stephan, F. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management. CSD&M 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04209-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04209-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04208-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04209-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics