Skip to main content

Earnings Quality: Does State Ownership Matter? Evidence from Vietnam

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Beyond Traditional Probabilistic Methods in Economics (ECONVN 2019)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 809))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In regard to profitability and efficiency, although there are mixed empirical evidence, private ownership is predominantly proven to be superior to state ownership. Motivated by this phenomenon, we are curious whether the earnings numbers released by privately owned enterprises are better than the ones published by state-owned companies in term of earnings quality. The results in this research reveal an interesting picture of earnings quality in the Vietnamese financial market. Specifically, using a matched sample of state-owned companies and privately owned companies, we show that private firms are more likely to “manipulate” their reported earnings number than state-owned firms in the Vietnamese financial market. Based on the result, we recommend that when assessing the quality of earnings, analysts and investors should pay more attention to those released by privately owned enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Dechow et al. (2010) [11] for an excellent review of the determinants of earnings quality.

  2. 2.

    Stoxplus and Vietstock are the leading financial information services companies in Vietnam.

References

  1. Aharony, J., Swary, I.: Quarterly dividend and earnings announcements and stockholders’ returns: an empirical analysis. J. Financ. 35(1), 1–12 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balsam, S., Haw, I., Lilien, S.: Mandated accounting changes and managerial discretion. J. Account. Econ. 20, 3–29 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barth, M.E., Landsman, W.R., Lang, M.H.: International accounting standards and accounting quality. J. Account. Res. 46(3), 467–498 (2008). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00287.x. Accessed 16 June 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boardman, A.E., Vining, A.R.: Ownership and performance in competitive environments: a comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. J. Law Econ. 32(1), 1–33 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowen, R., Lacey, J., Noreen, E.: Determinants of the corporate decision to capitalize interest. J. Account. Econ. 3, 151–179 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R.: The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a competitive environment: the case of Canadian railroads. J. Polit. Econ. 88(5), 958–976 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CFA Institute: Financial Reporting and Analysis, CFA Program Curriculum, Level 2, vol. 2, pp. 343–415 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, D., Dey, A., Lys, T.: Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. Account. Rev. 83, 757–787 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daley, L., Vigeland, R.: The effects of debt covenants and political costs on the choice of accounting methods: the case of accounting for R&D costs. J. Account. Econ. 5, 195–211 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dechow, P.M., Schrand, C.M.: Earnings Quality. The Research Foundation of CFA Institute, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dechow, P.M., Ge, W., Schrand, C.M.: Understanding earnings quality: a review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. J. Account. Econ. 50(2–3), 344–401 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dechow, P., Sloan, R., Sweeney, A.: Detecting earnings management. Account. Rev. 70, 193–225 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. DeFond, M., Jiambalvo, J.: Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. J. Account. Econ. 17, 145–176 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dewenter, K.L., Malatesta, P.H.: State-owned and privately owned firms: an empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(1), 320–334 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, J.: Private vs state ownership and earnings management: evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 15(2), 223–238 (2007). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00556.x. Accessed 12 June 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagerman, R., Zmijewski, M.: Some economic determinants of accounting policy choice. J. Account. Econ. 1, 141–161 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Healy, P.M., Wahlen, J.M.: A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Account. Horiz. 13(4), 365–383 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hussin, B.M., Ahmed, A.D., Ying, T.C.: Semi-strong form efficiency: market reaction to dividend and earnings announcements in Malaysian stock exchange. IUP J. Appl. Finan. 16, 36–60 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H.: Can the corporation survive? Financ. Anal. J. 34(1), 31–37 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, J.: Earnings management during import relief investigations. J. Account. Res. 29, 193–228 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz, S.P.: Earnings quality and ownership structure: the role of private equity sponsors. Account. Rev. 84(3), 623–658 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keating, A., Zimmerman, J.: Depreciation-policy changes: tax, earnings management, and investment opportunity incentives. J. Account. Econ. 28, 359–389 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kinney, W., McDaniel, L.: Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings. J. Account. Econ. 11, 71–93 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lang, M., Raedy, J., Yetman, M.: How representative are firms that are cross-listed in the United States? An analysis of accounting quality. J. Account. Res. 41, 363–386 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lang, M., Raedy, J., Wilson, W.: Earnings management and cross listing: are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings? J. Account. Econ. 42, 255–283 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin, S., Parker, D.: Privatization and economic performance throughout the UK business cycle. Manag. Decis. Econ. 16(3), 225–237 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nguyen, V.T., Freeman, N.J.: State-owned enterprises in Vietnam: are they ‘crowding out’ the private sector? Post Communist Econ. 21, 227–247 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Richardson, S., Sloan, R., Soliman, M., Tuna, I.: Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices. J. Account. Econ. 39, 437–485 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shleifer, A.: State versus private ownership. J. Econ. Perspect. 12, 133–150 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sloan, R.: Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? Account. Rev. 71, 289–315 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sweeney, A.: Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. J. Account. Econ. 17, 281–308 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. The General Statistics Office of Vietnam, Press release on the preliminary results of the 2017 Economic Census (2018). http://www.gso.gov.vn/default.aspx?tabid=382&ItemID=18686. Accessed 20 June 2018

  33. The OECD: Structural Policy Country Notes Vietnam, Structural Policy Challenges for Southeast Asian Countries, pp. 1–18 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. The Prime Minister of The Vietnamese Government: Decision No. 929/QD-TTg (2012). http://vanban.chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban?class_id=2&_page=1&mode=detail&document_id=162394. Accessed 20 June 2018

  35. The Vietnamese Congress: The Vietnamese Securities Law (2006). http://vanban.chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban?class_id=1&_page=3&mode=detail&document_id=80082. Accessed 16 June 2018

  36. The Vietnamese Government: Decree 101/2009/ND-CP (2009). http://www.moj.gov.vn/vbpq/lists/vn

  37. The Vietnamese Government: Decree 59/2011/ND-CP (2011). http://vanban.chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban?class_id=1&_page=1&mode=detail&document_id=101801. Accessed 20 June 2018

  38. Vietnam Development Report: Market Economy for a Middle-Income Vietnam, Joint Donor Report to the Vietnam Consultative Group Meeting December 06, 2011 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Watts, R.L., Zimmerman, J.L.: Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Account. Rev. 53(1), 112–134 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Watts, R., Zimmerman, J.: Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tran Minh Tam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tam, T.M., Minh, L.Q., Khuyen, L.T., Thanh, N.P. (2019). Earnings Quality: Does State Ownership Matter? Evidence from Vietnam. In: Kreinovich, V., Thach, N., Trung, N., Van Thanh, D. (eds) Beyond Traditional Probabilistic Methods in Economics. ECONVN 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 809. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04200-4_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics