Abstract
The merging of two clusters to produce a new cluster that conserves mass is one of the most basic mechanisms of size change in dispersed populations. The process is known by many different names: aggregation, agglomeration, coagulation, polymerization, flocculation, and others that refer to the physical aspects of the particular problem at hand. We will use aggregation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We read i∕2 as an integer division.
- 2.
We have used θ already in Chap. 5. We now see that it has an intuitive interpretation.
- 3.
This number is also known as sequence A000009 in the online encyclopedia of integer sequences (see http://oeis.org/A000009).
- 4.
- 5.
This result can be confirmed for all i > j ≥ 1 using the parent–offspring relationships.
- 6.
Since we require the normalization K ii = 1, these constants must satisfy a 1 + a 2 = 1.
- 7.
Use
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \left(1+\frac{1}{M}\right)^M\to e;\quad \frac{M}{M-N+1}\to \frac{M}{M-N};\quad \frac{N+1}{N}\to 1 . \end{aligned}$$ - 8.
The set of all parents of all offspring is the complete parent ensemble. Therefore, a summation over all parents of all offspring is a summation over the ensemble of parents.
- 9.
In the physical chemistry literature the clustering processes usually go by the name coagulation.
- 10.
In the case i = 1 there is no source term on the right-hand side because monomers cannot be produced by aggregation.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
This graph is given on p139 in Marcus (1968).
- 14.
We discuss Stockmayer’s method in great detail in Chap. 9.
- 15.
Spouge in fact uses the symbol w k for what we notate w k∕k! To avoid confusion we translate Spouge’s results in our own notation.
- 16.
- 17.
The similarity to the integral for the residual enthalpy is remarkable.
References
D.J. Aldous, Deterministic and stochastic models for coalescence (aggregation and coagulation): a review of the mean-field theory for probabilists. Bernoulli 5(1), 3–48 (1999)
R.L. Drake, A mathematical survey of the coagulation equation, in Topics in Current Aerosol Research, vol. 3, ed. by C.M. Hidy, J.R. Brock (Pergamon Press, New York, 1972), pp. 204–379
E.M. Hendriks, J.L. Spouge, M. Eibl, M. Schreckenberg, Exact solutions for random coagulation processes. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 58(3), 219–227 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01309254. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01309254
F. Leyvraz, Scaling theory and exactly solved models in the kinetics of irreversible aggregation. Physics Reports 383(2–3), 95–212 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00241-2. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00241-2
A.A. Lushnikov, Evolution of coagulating systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 45(3), 549–556 (1973). URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021979773901719
A.A. Lushnikov, Evolution of coagulating systems. ii. asymptotic size distributions and analytical properties of generating functions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 48(3), 400–409 (1974). URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WHR-4CV7YC5-1H/2/ec1b7fbc574d183f73c0a3ba64a567ea
A.A. Lushnikov, Evolution of coagulating systems : III. coagulating mixtures. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 54(1), 94–101 (1976). URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WHR-4CV92N7-KB/2/10caea82d7ada3c813013e71748d27a3
A.A. Lushnikov, Coagulation in finite systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 65(2), 276–285 (1978). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(78)90158-3
A.A. Lushnikov, From sol to gel exactly. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 198302 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.198302. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.198302
A.A. Lushnikov, Exact kinetics of the sol-gel transition. Phys. Rev. E 71, 046129 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.046129
A.A. Lushnikov, Gelation in coagulating systems. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenomena 222(1–2), 37–53 (2006a). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2006.08.002. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016727890600306X
A.A. Lushnikov, Sol-gel transition in a source-enhanced coagulating system. Phys. Rev. E 74, 011103 (2006b). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011103. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011103
A.A. Lushnikov, Exact kinetics of a coagulating system with the kernel k = 1. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 44(33), 335001 (2011). URL http://stacks.iop.org/1751-8121/44/i=33/a=335001
A.A. Lushnikov, Supersingular mass distributions in gelling systems. Phys. Rev. E 86, 051139 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.051139. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.051139
A.A. Lushnikov, Postcritical behavior of a gelling system. Phys. Rev. E 88, 052120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.052120. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.052120
A. Marcus, Stochastic coalescence. Technometrics 10(1), 133–143 (1968). URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1266230
J.L. Spouge, Solutions and critical times for the monodisperse coagulation equation when a ij = A + B(i + j) + Cij. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 16(4), 767–774 (1983a). URL http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0305-4470/16/4/014
J.L. Spouge, The size distribution for the a g rb f−g model of polymerization. J. Stat. Phys. 31, 363–378 (1983b). ISSN 0022-4715. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011587. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01011587
J.L. Spouge, Equilibrium polymer size distributions. Macromolecules 16(1), 121–127 (1983c). URL http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ma00235a024
J.L. Spouge, Asymmetric bonding of identical units: A general a g rb f−g polymer model. Macromolecules 16(5), 831–838 (1983d). URL http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ma00239a021
J.L. Spouge, Monte Carlo results for random coagulation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 107(1), 38–43 (1985a). URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WHR-4CX6YFY-HD/2/e615b0fedacbd185beaa2dc9a0be60b7
J.L. Spouge, Analytic solutions to Smoluchowski’s coagulation equation: a combinatorial interpretation. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 18(15), 3063 (1985b). URL http://stacks.iop.org/0305-4470/18/i=15/a=028
W.H. Stockmayer, Theory of molecular size distribution and gel formation in branched-chain polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 11(2), 45–55 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1723803. URL http://link.aip.org/link/?JCP/11/45/1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix: Derivations
Appendix: Derivations
8.1.1 Equation (8.20)
Here we derive Eq. (8.20), which gives the evolution of the partition function during aggregation. We begin with
We insert these into the master equation (8.15) and rearrange the result in the form,
The ratio of the factorials involves the offspring distribution in the numerator, and the parent distribution in the denominator. These differ only in the number of cluster masses involved in the aggregation event:
with the last result obtained by application of the parent–offspring relationships in Eq. (8.12). Combining these results we obtain
Here, the summation over parents of n is organized as follows: for every cluster mass in n we first sum over the i∕2 parents of that cluster mass (inner summation), then run the outer summation over all members of n. Cluster mass i = 1 cannot be formed by aggregation and thus the outer summation begins at i = 2. Given the symmetry of the kernel, K ij = K ji, the inner summation is extended over the range j = 1 to j = i − 1; this amounts to double-counting all terms of this summation and so the result is
This leads directly into Eq. (8.20) of the text. In this form, the summation over all (i − j, j)-parents of n is converted into a double summation in which the outer sum goes over all clusters i > 1 that can be formed by aggregation, while the inner sum goes over all possible binary events that can form the cluster mass i. The construction of this summation is illustrated with a numerical example below.
Note 8.5 (Construction of the Double Summation)
We consider the distribution
in the ensemble M = 6, N = 3 (see Fig. 8.6). The distribution consists of one monomer, one dimer, and one trimer. It has two parents, one that forms the trimer by the reaction 2 + 1, and one that forms the dimer by the reaction 1 + 1. The (2, 1)-parent is counted twice, therefore the number of ordered parent–offspring events is 3, also equal to M − N. The double summation in Eq. (8.20) contains the following terms:
In this example, n 3 = n 2 = 1, and the summation finally expands to M − N = 6 − 3 = 3 terms. In general, if the multiplications by n i are expanded to a sum of n i identical terms, the total number of terms in the double summation will always be M − N. Each (i − j, j)-parent contributes the quantity
to the summation. Then an alternative expression for the double sum in Eq. (8.20) is
in which the summation is now over all (i − j, j) parents of distribution n.
8.1.2 Smoluchowski Eq. (8.87)
We begin with Eq. (8.85)
and work the summation through the Kronecker deltas to express the result in the form
All terms on the right-hand side refer to the parent ensemble, \(\mu \mathcal C(M,N+1)\), as indicated by the subscript on the ensemble average, therefore we drop the primes as unnecessary. The first term on the right-hand side reduces to the mean number of cluster mass k in the parent ensemble:
The second term is
The third term is
Combining these results we obtain Eq. (8.87) of the main text.
8.1.3 Aggregation in the Continuous Domain
8.1.3.1 Derivation 1
The partition function is the product of the volume of the ensemble and a term that represents the effect of the kernel,
with
and
In this form the partition function is expressed as a product of two terms, one that represents the unbiased ensemble (\({\mathcal V}\)), and one that represents the effect of the aggregation kernel (\(\mathcal K\)). This factorization carries over to the parameters β and \(\log q\), which may also be expressed as the product of the unbiased case times a factor that includes the effect of the kernel.
The \(\log \) of the first term in the ThL is obtained using the Stirling approximation \(\log x!\to x\log x-x\)
For large \({\bar x}\) this further reduces to the derivative of \({\bar x}\log {\bar x}\):
For \(\log \mathcal K\) we have
The ensemble average kernel in the ThL is an intensive function of \({\bar x}=M/N\):
The summation in (8.126) becomes an integral in dN′
which is to be evaluated at constant M. Using \(N'=M/{\bar x}\), we have
We insert into Eq. (8.128) and switch the integration variable to \(y={\bar x}\). Noting that the integration limits are now from \(y={\bar x}\) (current state) to y = 1 (initial state), we have
and finally
Combining Eqs. (8.124) and (8.131) we obtain the full partition function:
We obtain β and \(\log q\) from their relationship to the partition function:
Identity
The following identity was used:
This is obtained by integration by parts noting that \(\log \bar K(1)=0\).
8.1.3.2 Alternative Derivation
As an exercise we try an alternative derivation. We start with the discrete quantities
to obtain their form in the thermodynamic limit. We may obtain each of these terms for each partition function, \({\mathcal V}_{M,N}\) and \(\mathcal {K}_{M,N}\), separately.
By direct application of the multinomial term, the M-derivative is
Similarly, the derivative with respect to N is
The finite difference of \(\log \mathcal {K}_{M,N}\) with respect to M is
which is obtained by application of Eq. (8.123) and careful arrangement of the terms in the summation. For the first term we have
because by normalization of the kernel, K 11 = 1. The ratios in the summation turn into the partial derivative of \(\log \left \langle K \right \rangle _{M,N}\) with respect to M:
and the summation becomes an integral in dN′ at constant M Footnote 17:
Setting
we obtain
and with these results, the integral in the ThL becomes
Finally, the result for \(\beta _{\mathcal K}\) is
This can be expressed in the equivalent form by performing integration by parts:
which gives
The N-derivative of \(\log \mathcal {K}_{M,N}\) is much easier and follows from Eq. (8.123):
The final results for β and \(\log q\) are obtained by combining the above results:
These results agree with those in Eqs. (8.132), (8.133), and (8.134).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matsoukas, T. (2018). Irreversible Clustering. In: Generalized Statistical Thermodynamics. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04149-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04149-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04148-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04149-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)