Skip to main content

Cardiac Arrest in the Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Patient: Is Conservatism an Aggressive Approach?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Difficult Decisions in Cardiothoracic Critical Care Surgery

Part of the book series: Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach ((DDSURGERY))

  • 958 Accesses

Abstract

Resuscitation of the arresting cardiac surgery patient who has undergone a minimally invasive, sternal-sparing cardiac procedure presents a unique clinical challenge. This chapter reviews the reported incidence of post-operative cardiac arrest and provides recommendations for management of this subset of cardiac surgery patients. We recommend that institutions practicing minimally invasive surgery develop a clear and agreed upon protocol for management of the arresting non-sternotomy cardiac surgery patient. If extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is available, we believe that peripheral venoarterial ECMO should be considered the first-line of intervention in the non-sternotomy patient suffering refractory cardiac arrest. If resuscitation via ECMO is not available, a sternotomy is an acceptable alternative as long as the operating surgeon is available or a trained team is comfortable with performing a fresh sternotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dunning J, et al. Guideline for resuscitation in cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunning J, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons expert consensus for the resuscitation of patients who arrest after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1005–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy DA, et al. The expanding role of endoscopic robotics in mitral valve surgery: 1,257 consecutive procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(5):1675–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillinov AM, et al. Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(1):82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grossi EA, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(3):660–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamelas J, et al. Isolated and concomitant minimally invasive minithoracotomy aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(3):926–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glauber M, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(3):548–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonaros N, et al. Five hundred cases of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: predictors of success and safety. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(3):803–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Halkos ME, et al. Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(1):179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McGinn, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lapar DJ, et al. Hospital variation in mortality from cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery: an opportunity for improvement? Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(2):534–9. discussion 539–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao Y, Xing J, Du Z, Liu F, Jia M, Hou X. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adult patients who underwent post-cardiac surgery. Eur J Med Res. 2015;20:83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mazzeffi MA, et al. Outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest in adult cardiac surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(4):1133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf MJ, Kanter KR, Kirshbom PM, Kogon BE, Wagoner SF. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for pediatric cardiac patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:874–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Husam H. Balkhy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wehman, B., Balkhy, H.H. (2019). Cardiac Arrest in the Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Patient: Is Conservatism an Aggressive Approach?. In: Lonchyna, V. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Cardiothoracic Critical Care Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04146-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04146-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04145-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04146-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics