Abstract
Resuscitation of the arresting cardiac surgery patient who has undergone a minimally invasive, sternal-sparing cardiac procedure presents a unique clinical challenge. This chapter reviews the reported incidence of post-operative cardiac arrest and provides recommendations for management of this subset of cardiac surgery patients. We recommend that institutions practicing minimally invasive surgery develop a clear and agreed upon protocol for management of the arresting non-sternotomy cardiac surgery patient. If extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is available, we believe that peripheral venoarterial ECMO should be considered the first-line of intervention in the non-sternotomy patient suffering refractory cardiac arrest. If resuscitation via ECMO is not available, a sternotomy is an acceptable alternative as long as the operating surgeon is available or a trained team is comfortable with performing a fresh sternotomy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dunning J, et al. Guideline for resuscitation in cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:3–28.
Dunning J, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons expert consensus for the resuscitation of patients who arrest after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1005–20.
Murphy DA, et al. The expanding role of endoscopic robotics in mitral valve surgery: 1,257 consecutive procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(5):1675–81.
Gillinov AM, et al. Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(1):82–91.
Grossi EA, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(3):660–3.
Lamelas J, et al. Isolated and concomitant minimally invasive minithoracotomy aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(3):926–36.
Glauber M, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(3):548–56.
Bonaros N, et al. Five hundred cases of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: predictors of success and safety. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(3):803–12.
Halkos ME, et al. Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(1):179–85.
McGinn, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S78–84.
Lapar DJ, et al. Hospital variation in mortality from cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery: an opportunity for improvement? Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(2):534–9. discussion 539–40
Zhao Y, Xing J, Du Z, Liu F, Jia M, Hou X. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adult patients who underwent post-cardiac surgery. Eur J Med Res. 2015;20:83.
Mazzeffi MA, et al. Outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest in adult cardiac surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(4):1133–9.
Wolf MJ, Kanter KR, Kirshbom PM, Kogon BE, Wagoner SF. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for pediatric cardiac patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:874–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wehman, B., Balkhy, H.H. (2019). Cardiac Arrest in the Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Patient: Is Conservatism an Aggressive Approach?. In: Lonchyna, V. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Cardiothoracic Critical Care Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04146-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04146-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04145-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04146-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)