Skip to main content

Welfare Fraud Inspectors Between Standardization and Discretion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government

Abstract

This chapter focuses on welfare fraud investigators, who check the compliance of recipients to the bureaucratic rules regulating the payment of welfare benefits. Its aim is twofold. First, it sheds light on an under-researched bureaucratic investigation function, which is key to anti-welfare fraud policies, themselves at the core of recent changes in the social state. Second, it draws on this case to address the question of contradictory trends between a high level of discretion, often enjoyed by inspectors, and a tendency toward the standardization of inspection practices. It shows how the combination of these two apparently mutually exclusive tendencies reinforces inspection work, surveillance, and sanctions over welfare recipients. It is based on a long-term fieldwork in French welfare organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brodkin, E. Z. (1986). The false promise of administrative reform: Implementing quality control in welfare. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, V. (2003). Les conditions socio-politiques de la rigueur juridique. Paris: CNAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, V. (2009). Towards a critical policy ethnography: Lessons from fieldwork on welfare control in France. Critical Policy Studies, 3(2), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, V. (2015). Politique de contrôle et lutte contre la fraude dans la branche famille. Paris: CNAF/Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, V. (2018). The state, legal rigor and the poor: The daily practice of welfare control. In T. Thelen, L. Vetters, & K. von Benda-Beckmann (Eds.), Stategraphy: Toward a relational anthropology of the state (pp. 35–55). New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, V., Paris, M., & Weill, P-E. (2018). Targeting by numbers: The uses of statistics for monitoring French welfare benefit recipients. In L. Barrault-Stella & P-E Weill (Eds.), Creating target publics for welfare policies: A comparative and multi-level approach (pp. 93–109). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (2013). Taking rights seriously: Bloomsbury revelations series. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T., & Hupe. P. L. (Eds.). (Forthcoming). The Palgrave handbook on discretion: The quest for controlled freedom. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2001). La ‘Gouvernementalité’. Dits et Ecrits (Vol. 2, pp. 637–655). Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, P., & Graham, T. (2016). Designing electronic information systems for the future: Social workers and the challenge of new public management. Critical Social Policy, 36(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliom, J. (2001). Overseers of the poor: Surveillance, resistance, and the limits of privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, K. S. (2011). Cheating welfare: Public assistance and the criminalization of poverty. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E. (2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, I. (2006). At the front lines of the welfare system: A perspective on the decline in welfare caseloads. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’? British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, N. M., Meyers, M. K., Lurie, I., & Han, J. S. (2004). The implementation of welfare reform policy: The role of public managers in front-line practices. Public Administration Review, 64(4), 438–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serre, D. (2017). Class and gender relations in the welfare state: The contradictory dictates of the norm of female autonomy. Social Sciences, 6(2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Dubois .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dubois, V. (2019). Welfare Fraud Inspectors Between Standardization and Discretion. In: Van de Walle, S., Raaphorst, N. (eds) Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04058-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics