Abstract
The chapter discusses a case of collaborative tax inspection where large construction companies work with tax inspectors to check for compliance with tax rules and laws. What makes the case stand out is that the tax inspectors must engage and enroll reluctant construction companies to do new inspection tasks on a voluntary basis. The chapter reports the results of intensive ethnographic fieldwork conducted during the spring of 2015 among tax inspectors in Sweden. Their aim was to motivate construction companies into assisting them in checking for tax compliance in an environment with famously high risks of financial crime. To analyse the material the chapter draws on Callon’s sociology of translation. His theoretical concepts of problematization, obligatory passages points, enrolment and trial of strengths are used to highlight the process whereby the tax inspectors enroll the companies to engage in the tax inspection. Callon’s concepts are thus used to bring forth how the interests of the concerned construction companies are being translated to align with the interests of the Swedish tax authority. All-in-all, the chapter shows the challenges in collaborating with reluctant actors when engaging in traditionally coercive regulation such as taxation. Yet, it also shows the potential deep transformation of the way tax inspection is practiced on the ground when antagonism between inspector and inspected is no longer the default relationship, but collaboration is what is being built up in new fragile alliances.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Houndmills and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2012). Rethinking public service delivery: Managing with external providers. Houndmills and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2016). The ‘3Rs’ in rethinking governance. Ruling, rationalities and resistance. In R. A. W. Rhodes & M. Bevir (Eds.), Rethinking governance: Ruling, rationalities and resistance (pp. 1–22). London, UK: Routledge.
Boll, K. (2016). Collaborative tax regulation: Can consumers be engaged as partners in the regulatory craft? Journal of Tax Administration, 2(2), 4–23.
Boll, K., & Tell, M. (2015). Proactive public disclosure: A new regulatory strategy for creating tax compliance? Nordic Tax Journal, 2, 36–46.
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.
Braithwaite, V. (2007). Responsive regulation and taxation: Introduction. Law & Policy, 29(1), 3–10.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1990). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. The Sociological Review, 38, 132–161.
Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2013). Restoring trust through the co-production of public services: A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review, 16(3), 424–443.
Flinders, M. (2004). Distributed public governance in Britain. Public Administration, 82(4), 883–909.
Jakobsen, M., & Andersen, S. C. (2013). Coproduction and equity in public service delivery. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 704–713.
Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.20.
Needham, C. (2008). Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(2), 221–231.
OECD. (2013). Together for better outcomes: Engaging and involving sme taxpayers and stakeholder. Forum on Tax Administration Compliance Sub-Group: OECD Publishing.
Ryan, B. (2012). Co-production: Option or obligation? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(3), 314–324.
Sørensen, E. V. A., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Srensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Eijk, C. J. A., & Steen, T. P. S. (2013). Why people co-produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boll, K. (2019). Stimulating Collaboration and Cooperation in Tax Inspection. In: Van de Walle, S., Raaphorst, N. (eds) Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04058-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04058-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04057-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04058-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)