Abstract
Inspectors traditionally represented the hard hand of the state. They represent a powerful central government that has the power to enforce rules and levy fines. The interaction between an inspector and an inspectee is one characterized by unequal power and large uncertainly. At the frontline of government, inspectors combine their role of enforcer with that of a social worker and an educator. They are street-level bureaucrats with a crucial role in enforcing rules and laws and in steering citizens, organizations and companies into a desired direction. In the interaction between inspectors and inspectees, and in each of the chapters of this book, one sees a vivid picture of all the difficulties of governing a society and of working as a bureaucrat.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Apaza, C. R. (2010). Integrity and accountability in government: Homeland security and the inspector general. London: Routledge.
Gogol, N. (1999). Three plays: The government inspector; marriage; the gamblers. Camden: Bloomsbury.
Grek, S., & Lindgren, J. (Eds.). (2014). Governing by inspection. London: Routledge.
Kagan, R. A., & Bardach, E. (1982). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger: A study in administrative behavior. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Kelman, S. (1981). Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A comparative study of occupational safety and health policy. Cambridge: MIT press.
Light, P. C. (1993). Monitoring government: Inspectors general and the search for accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358.
Moore, M. H., & Gates, M. J. (1986). Inspectors-general: Junkyard dogs or man’s best friend? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Newcomer, K. E. (1998). The changing nature of accountability: The role of the inspector general in federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 58(2), 129–136.
Newcomer, K., & Grob, G. (2004). Federal offices of the inspector general: Thriving on chaos? The American Review of Public Administration, 34(3), 235–251.
Raaphorst, N. (2018). How to prove, how to interpret and what to do? Uncertainty experiences of street-level tax officials. Public Management Review, 20(4), 485–502.
Raaphorst, N., & Loyens, K. (2018). From poker games to kitchen tables: How social dynamics affect frontline decision making. Administration & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718761651.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van de Walle, S., Raaphorst, N. (2019). Introduction: The Social Dynamics of Daily Inspection Work. In: Van de Walle, S., Raaphorst, N. (eds) Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04058-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04058-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04057-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04058-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)