Abstract
We find ourselves at a social, political, economic and environmental crossroads, where Development Studies in all its facets have been designated a leading role. Postcolonial Studies and postcolonial perspectives have often been neglected in Development Studies debates. Usually the fields are considered as being far apart: the former being concerned with discourse and representation, the latter focusing on the applicability of concepts and practices. However, linking both fields of thought may provide valuable insights for Development Studies to better cope with the global challenges of the twenty-first century. To illustrate possible openings the chapter discusses analytical tools of Postcolonial Studies in the context of development. It asks whether Postcolonial-Development Studies are imaginable and how Development Studies and research can benefit from postcolonial strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion [110 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 30. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201302.
Bernstein, H. (2001). Colonialism, Capitalism, Development. In T. Allen & A. Thomas (Eds.), Poverty and Development into the 21st Century (pp. 241–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beverly, J. (1999). Subalternity and Representation: Arguments in Cultural Theory. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Bhabha, H. (1994). Signs Taken for Wonders. Questions of Ambivalence and Authority Under a Tree Outside Delhi, May 1817. In H. Bhabha (Ed.), The Location of Culture (pp. 145–174). London: Routledge.
Bhambra, G. K. (2007). Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cowen, M. P., & Shenton, R. W. (1996). Doctrines of Development. London: Routledge.
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. and Trans.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Goulet, D. (1980). Development Experts: The One-Eyed Giants. World Development, 8(7–8), 481–489.
Hall, S. (1992). The West and the Rest. Discourse and Power. In B. Gieben & S. Hall (Eds.), Formations of Modernity (pp. 276–320). London: Polity Press.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
Kothari, U. (2005). From Colonial Administration to Development Studies: A Post-colonial Critique of the History of Development Studies. In U. Kothari (Ed.), A Radical History of Development Studies: Individuals, Institutions and Ideologies (pp. 47–66). London: Zed Books.
Loomba, A. (2008). Colonialism/Post colonialism. London: Routledge.
Mato, D. (2000). Not “Studying the Subaltern,” but Studying with “Subaltern” Social Groups, or, at Least, Studying the Hegemonic Articulations of Power. Nepantla: Views from the South,1(3), 479–503.
Matthews, S. (2018, January 10). Confronting the Colonial Library: Teaching Political Studies Amidst Calls for a Decolonised Curriculum. Politikon. South African Journal of Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2018.1418204.
McClintock, A. (1992). The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-colonialism”. Social Text (31–32), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/466219.
McDonnell, J. (2003). Challenging the Euro-Western Epistemological Dominance of Development Through an African Cosmovision. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
McEwan, C. (2008). Subaltern. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 59–64). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McEwan, C. (2009). Postcolonialism and Development. New York: Routledge.
Meckesheimer, A. (2013). Decolonization of Social Research Practice in Latin America. What Can We Learn for German Social Sciences? Transcience,4(2), 79–98.
Melber, H. (2015). Knowledge Is Power—And Power Affects Knowledge: Challenges for Research Collaboration in and with Africa. Africa Development, 40(4), 21–42.
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). Prophets Facing Sidewise: The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. Social Epistemology, 19(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720500084325.
Nandi, M. (2012). Sprachgewalt, Unterdrückung und die Verwundbarkeit der postkolonialen Intellektuellen: Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: “Can the Subaltern Speak” und “Critique of Postcolonial Reason”. In J. Reuter & A. Karentzos (Eds.), Schlüsselwerke der Postcolonial Studies (pp. 121–130). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Raghuram, P., & Madge, C. (2006). Towards a Method for Postcolonial Development Geography? Possibilities and Challenges. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 27, 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00262.x.
Rostow, W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sachs, W. (Ed.). (2005). The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Eleventh Impression. London: Zed Books.
Said, E. (1994/1978). From Orientalism. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader (pp. 132–149). New York: Columbia University Press.
Sardar, Z. (1999). Development and the Locations of Eurocentrism. In R. Munck & D. O’Hearn (Eds.), Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm (pp. 44–62), London: Zed Books.
Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995). The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1086/204378.
Sheppard, E. (2002). The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality. Economic Geography,78(3), 307–330.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies. Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.
Spivak, G. C. (1994/1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader (pp. 66–111). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Sylvester, C. (1999). Development Studies and Postcolonial Studies: Disparate Tales of the “Third World”. Third World Quarterly, 20(4), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913514.
Thomas, A. (2001). Meanings and Views of Development. In T. Allen & A. Thomas (Eds.), Poverty and Development into the 21st Century (pp. 23–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tucker, V. (1999). The Myth of Development: A Critique of a Eurocentric Discourse. In R. Munck & D. O’Hearn (Eds.), Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm. London: Zed Books.
Willis, K. (2005). Theories and Practices of Development. New York: Routledge.
Young, R. J. C. (2003). Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ziai, A. (2012). Postcolonial Perspectives on ‘Development’ (Working Paper No. 103). Center for Development Research. University of Bonn.
Ziai, A. (2016a). Postkoloniale Studien und Politikwissenschaft. Komplementäre Defizite und ein Forschungsprogramm. In A. Ziai (Ed.), Postkoloniale Politikwissenschaft. Theoretische und empirische Zugänge. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Ziai, A. (2016b). Development Discourse and Global History: From Colonialism to the Sustainable Development Goals. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schöneberg, J. (2019). Imagining Postcolonial-Development Studies: Reflections on Positionalities and Research Practices. In: Baud, I., Basile, E., Kontinen, T., von Itter, S. (eds) Building Development Studies for the New Millennium. EADI Global Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04052-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04052-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04051-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04052-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)