Skip to main content

Knowledge Production, Ownership and the Power of Definition: Perspectives on and from Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: EADI Global Development Series ((EADI))

Abstract

The chapter engages with challenges facing genuine research collaboration and knowledge production in a North–South interaction with particular reference to Development Studies. It maps asymmetries in scholarly interaction generally and examines African realities specifically. Partnership limitations are critically explored by identifying some structural legacies resulting from centuries of Northern hegemony established in all spheres related to global affairs and interactions. It presents some thoughts on how these limitations might be reduced or eliminated in favour of a truly joint effort to work towards equal relations and mutual respect—also as an integral part of EADI’s agenda for Development Studies to contribute towards global partnerships. Special attention is given to the variety of views from within the African continent and African scholars elsewhere engaged in related debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghajanian, A., & Allouche, J. (2016). Introduction: Development Studies—Past, Present and Future. IDS Bulletin, 47(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baaz, M. E. (2005). The Paternalism of Partnership: A Postcolonial Reading of Identity in Development Aid. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliesemann de Guevara, B., & Kostic, R. (2017). Knowledge Production in/About Conflict and Intervention: Finding ‘Facts’, Telling ‘Truth’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2017.1287635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bothwell, E. (2016, May 7). African Universities Must Be ‘Audacious’ to Transform Continent. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/african-universities-must-be-audacious-to-transform-continent. Accessed 4 June 2017.

  • Briggs, R. C., & Weathers, S. (2016). Gender and Location in African Politics Scholarship: The Other White Man’s Burden? African Affairs, 115(460), 466–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adw009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, A. (2017a, May 17). African Universities Must Take a Critical View of Knowledge and How It’s Made. The Conversation.https://theconversation.com/african-universities-must-take-a-critical-view-of-knowledge-and-how-its-made-77878. Accessed 5 June 2017.

  • Broadbent, A. (2017b, June 1). It Will Take Critical, Thorough Scrutiny to Truly Decolonize Knowledge. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/it-will-take-critical-thorough-scrutiny-to-truly-decolonise-knowledge-78477. Accessed 5 June 2017.

  • Callods, F. (2016). Knowledge Divides: Social Science Production on Inequalities and Social Justice. In World Social Sciences Report 2016 (pp. 280–285). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and International Social Science Council (ISSC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonnier, G., & Kontinen, T. (2014). North-South Research Partnerships: Academia Meets Development? (Policy Paper Series). Bonn: European Association for Development Research and Training Institutes EADI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonnier, G., & Kontinen, T. (2015). Institutional Learning in North-South Research Partnerships. Revue Tiers Monde, 221, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.3917/rtm.221.0149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for African Studies. (n.d., 1998). Teaching Africa: The Curriculum Debate at UCT. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, N., Death, C., & Whitfield, L. (2017). Notes on Researching Africa. African Affairs, Virtual issue on Research Notes, available online only, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adx005.

  • Collier, P. (1993). Africa and the Study of Economics. In R. H. Bates, V. Y. Mudimbe, & J. F. O’Barr (Eds.), Africa and the Disciplines—The Contributions of Research in Africa to the Social Sciences and Humanities (pp. 58–82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2012). Theory from the South or, How Euro-America Is Evolving Toward Africa. London: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabashi, H. (2009). The Discrete Charm of European Intellectuals. International Journal of Zizek Studies, 3(4). http://zizekstudies.org/index.php/ijzs/article/view/220/314. Accessed 23 February 2016.

  • Dabashi, H. (2013, January 15). Can Non-Europeans Think? What Happens to Thinkers Who Operate Outside the European Philosophical ‘Pedigree’? AlJazeera. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/01/2013114142638797542.html. Accessed 11 February 2015.

  • Dabashi, H. (2015). Can Non-Europeans Think? London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. (2016). Introduction: Information, Knowledge and Power. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 132–150 (Originally published in 1994, 25(2)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M., & Hewitt, M. V. (Eds.). (2009). Empire, Development & Colonialism. The Past in the Present. Woodbridge: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. R. (2014). Disciplinary Decadence and the Decolonisation of Knowledge. Africa Development,39(1), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhand, J. (2007). The Paternalism of Partnership: A Postcolonial Reading of Identity in Development Aid by Maria Eriksson Baaz. Journal of Agrarian Change,7(3), 418–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, T. (2017). International Co-operation and the Democratization of Knowledge. In T. Halvorsen & J. Nossum (Eds.), North-South Knowledge Networks: Towards Equitable Collaboration Between Academics, Donors and Universities (pp. 277–309). Cape Town and Bergen: African Minds and UIB Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, J. M., Hödl, G., & Kopf, M. (Eds.). (2014). Developing Africa: Concepts and Practices in Twentieth-Century Colonialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horáková, H. (2016). Knowledge Production in and on Africa: Knowledge Gatekeepers, Decolonization, Alternative Representations. In H. Horáková & K. Werkman (Eds.), Knowledge Production in and on Africa (pp. 21–52). Wien: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1983). African Philosophy: Myth and Reality. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. J. (1990). Scientific Dependence in Africa Today. Research in African Literature,21(3), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishengoma, J. M. (2016). North-South Research Collaborations and Their Impact on Capacity Building: A Southern Perspective. In T. Halvorsen & J. Nossum (Eds.), North-South Knowledge Networks: Towards Equitable Collaboration Between Academics, Donors and Universities (pp. 149–186). Cape Town and Bergen: African Minds and UIB Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, J. I. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, J. I. (2006). Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, J. I. (2011). Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R., & Santos, R. (2016). From Development of the ‘Other’ to Global Governance for Universal and Sustainable Development. IDS Bulletin,47(2), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krenceyová, M. (2014). Who Is Allowed to Speak About Africa? A Reflection on Knowledge, Positionality, and Authority in Africanist Scholarship. Africa Insight,44(1), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, W. (2008). Social Sciences Internationally—The Problem of Marginalisation and Its Consequences for the Discipline of Sociology. African Sociological Review,12(2), 22–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, W., Celic, E., Ersche, C., & Wöhrer, V. (Eds.). (2014). Global Knowledge Production in the Social Science: Made in Circulation. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagos, F. (2015). Review: Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation. Theory, Culture & Society. https://www.theoryculturesociety.org/review-global-knowledge-production-in-the-social-sciences-made-in-circulation/. Accessed 24 May 2017.

  • Levenson, Z. (2017, July 13). South Africa’s Very Own David Brooks. http://africasacountry.com/2017/07/south-africas-very-own-david-brooks/. Accessed 14 July 2017.

  • Macamo, E. (2016). ‘Before We Start’: Science and Power in the Constitution of Africa. In M. Ramutsindela, G. Miescher, & M. Boehi (Eds.), The Politics of Nature and Science in Southern Africa (pp. 323–334). Basel: Basler Afrika Bibliographien.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mama, A. (2007). Is It Ethical to Study Africa? Preliminary Thoughts on Scholarship and Freedom. African Studies Review, 50(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.2005.0122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melber, H. (2014). What Is African in Africa(n) Studies? Confronting the (Mystifying) Power of Ideology and Identity. Africa Bibliography, 2013, vii–xvii. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266673114000038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melber, H. (2015). Knowledge Is Power—And Power Affects Knowledge: Challenges for Research Collaboration in and with Africa. Africa Development, 40(4), 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melber, H. (2016). African Studies: The Ambiguity of Ownership and Originality. Africa, 86(2), 347–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972016000103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melber, H. (2017). Development Studies and the SDGs—Mapping an Agenda (Policy Paper Series). Bonn: European Association for Development Training and Research Institutes EADI. https://www.eadi.org/typo3/fileadmin/Documents/Publications/EADI_Policy_Paper/EADI_policy_paper_Melber_August_2017.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2018.

  • Mishra, P. (2014, October 14). The Western Model Is Broken. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/14/-sp-western-model-broken-pankaj-mishra). Accessed 16 February 2015.

  • Mishra, P. (2015, January 20). After the Paris Attacks: It’s Time for a New Enlightenment. The Guardian.http://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/jan/20/-sp-after-paris-its-time-for-new-enlightenment. Accessed 16 February 2015.

  • Mkandawire, T. (2002). African Intellectuals, Political Culture and Development. Austrian Journal of Development Studies,18(1), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire, T. (2011). Running While Others Walk: Knowledge and the Challenge of Africa’s Development. Africa Development,36(2), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, J., Carbonnier, G., Mellet, A., & De Haan, L. (2017). Towards a Renewed Vision of Development Studies. International Development Policy/Revue International De Politique De Développement, 8(1). https://poldev.revues.org/2393. Accessed 24 August 2017.

  • Ndhlovu, F. (2017). Southern Development Discourse for Southern Africa: Linguistic and Cultural Imperatives. Journal of Multicultural Discourses,12(2), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2016.1277733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obrecht, A. J. (2014). Wozu Wissen Wollen? Wissen—Herrschaft—Welterfahrung: Ein Beitrag zur Wissensdiskussion aus kultur- und wissenssoziologischer Perspektive. Wien: Edition Ausblick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogachi, I. O. (2011). Neo-Liberalism and the Subversion of Academic Freedom from Within: Money, Corporate Cultures and ‘Captured’ Intellectuals in African Public Universities. Journal of Higher Education in Africa,9(1&2), 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olukoshi, A. (2007). African Scholars and African Studies. In H. Melber (Ed.), On Africa: Scholars and African Studies: Contributions in Honour of Lennart Wohlgemuth (pp. 7–22). Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • QS. (2016). World University Rankings by Subject 2016—Development Studies. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2016/development-studies. Accessed 4 June 2017.

  • Robbe, K. (2014). African Studies at a Crossroads: Producing Theory Across the Disciplines in South Africa. Social Dynamics, 40(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2014.932175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sall, E. (2002). The Social Sciences in Africa. Austrian Journal of Development Studies,18(1), 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, H., & Taylor, P. (2016). Whose Knowledge Counts? Development Studies Institutions and Power Relations in a Globalised World. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 169–178 (Originally published in 2007, 38(2)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teferra, D. (2016, July 24). Ranking African Universities: Hypocrisy, Impunity and Complicity. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/ranking-african-universities-hypocrisy-impunity-and-complicity-62709. Accessed 4 June 2017.

  • The Guardian. (2017, March 8). QS World University Rankings 2017: Development Studies. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/mar/08/qs-world-university-rankings-2017-development-studies. Accessed 4 June 2017.

  • UNESCO/ISSC. (2010). World Social Science Report 2010: Knowledge Divides. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and International Social Science Council (ISSC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. (2006). Knowledge and inequality. In G. Therborn (Ed.), Inequalities of the World: New Theoretical Frameworks, Multiple Empirical Approaches (pp. 163–190). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. (2001). Review of Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples by Linda Tuhiwai Smith. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand,17, 214–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • World University Ranking. (2017). https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2017/development-studies. Accessed 4 June 2017.

  • Zeleza, P. T., & Olukoshi, A. (Eds.). (2004). African Universities in the Twenty-First Century: Volume II: Knowledge and Society. Dakar: CODESRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziai, A. (2012). Postcolonial Perspectives on ‘Development’ (ZEF Working Paper 103). Bonn: Centre for Development Research, University of Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziai, A. (2016). Development Discourse and Global History. From Colonialism to the Sustainable Development Goals. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Melber, H. (2019). Knowledge Production, Ownership and the Power of Definition: Perspectives on and from Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Baud, I., Basile, E., Kontinen, T., von Itter, S. (eds) Building Development Studies for the New Millennium. EADI Global Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04052-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics