Abstract
Lesson study was introduced to school districts in Florida in the United States as part of the federal government’s Race to the Top Program in 2010 to scale improvement in instruction and student learning. However, little is known about what district policy and leadership characteristics are associated with the level of lesson study implementation. Based on a mixed methods study of a statewide survey and interviews of district professional development directors, we found that district requirement of lesson study, funding provision, and future sustainability plan were significantly and positively associated with a broader implementation of lesson study within the district. The interviews revealed that the districts that implemented lesson study districtwide first internalized lesson study through communicating and funding a districtwide expectation of job-embedded, inquiry-based professional development. Following this internalization, the district leaders institutionalized it by supporting school ownership and leadership in organizing and embedding lesson study into the school organizational structures and routines. Implications for educational leaders at local educational agencies are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akiba, M. (2016). Traveling teacher professional development model: Local interpretation and adaptation of lesson study in Florida. In F. Astiz & M. Akiba (Eds.), The global and the local: New perspectives in comparative education (pp. 77–97). Rotterdam: Sense.
Akiba, M., & Wilkinson, B. (2016). Adopting an international innovation for teacher professional development: State and district approaches to lesson study in Florida. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 74–93.
Akiba, M., Wang, Z., & Liang, G. (2015). Organizational resources for professional development: A statewide longitudinal survey of middle school mathematics teachers. Journal of School Leadership, 25(March), 252–285.
Akiba, M., Wilkinson, B., Farfan, G., Howard, C., Kuleshova, A., Fryer, J., et al. (2016). Lesson study in Florida: A longitudinal survey of district policy and practice from 2013 to 2015. Tallahassee: Florida State University.
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010a). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010b). Common core state standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards1.pdf
Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of Comprehensive Reform Models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 121–153.
Dede, C., & Honan, J. P. (2005). Scaling up success: A synthesis of themes and insights. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 227–239). San Fracisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dede, C., Honan, J. P., & Peters, L. C. (2005). Scaling up success: Lessons from technology-based educational improvement. San Fracisco: Jossey-Bass.
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Birman, B. F., Garet, M. S., & Yoon, K. S. (2002). How do district management and implementation strategies relate to the quality of the professional development that districts provide to teachers? Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1265–1312.
Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1999). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 263–291). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Fink, D. (2000). Good schools/real schools: Why school reform doesn’t last. New York: Teachers College Press.
Firestone, W. A., Mangin, M. M., Martinez, M. C., & Polovsky, T. (2005). Leading coherent professional development: A comparison of three districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 413–448.
FLDOE. (2010a). Florida’s Race to the Top application for initial funding (CFDA 84.395A). Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education (FLDOE).
FLDOE. (2010b). Final scope of work. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education (FLDOE).
FLDOE. (n.d.-a). Race to the Top Grant Archive, from http://www.fldoe.org/arra/RacetotheTop-archive.asp
FLDOE. (n.d.-b). Race to the Top LEA final scope of work template definitions, from http://www.fldoe.org/arra/RacetotheTop-archive.asp
Floden, R. E., Porter, A. C., Alford, L. E., Freeman, D. J., Susan, I., Schmidt, W. H., & Schwille, J. R. (1988). Instructional leadership at the district level: A closer look at autonomy and control. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24(2), 96–124.
Gamoran, A. (2003). Access to resources. In A. Gamoran, W. Anderson, P. A. Quiroz, W. G. Secada, T. Williams, & S. Ashmann (Eds.), Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change (pp. 65–86). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gamoran, A., Anderson, W., Quiroz, P. A., Secada, W. G., Williams, T., & Ashmann, S. (Eds.). (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124–156.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. The Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693–700.
Hart, L. C., Alston, A. S., & Murata, A. (2011). Lesson-study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together. New York: Springer.
Hightower, A. M., Knapp, M. S., Marsh, J. A., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2002). School districts and instructional renewal. New York/London: Teachers College Press.
Knapp, M. S. (2003). Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27(109), 109–157.
Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook for teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, Inc.
Lewis, C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth: Heinneman.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., Hurd, J., & O’Connell, M. P. (2006). Lesson study comes of age in North America. Phi Delta Kappan, December, 88, 273–281.
Liang, G., & Akiba, M. (2018). Teachers’ working conditions: A cross-national analysis using the OECD TALIS and PISA data. In M. Akiba & G. K. LeTendre (Eds.), International handbook of teacher quality and policy (pp. 388–402). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Little, J. W. (1989). District policy choices and teachers’ professional development opportunities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 165–179.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
Marrongelle, K., Sztajn, P., & Smith, M. S. (2013). Scaling up professional development in an era of Common State Standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 202–211.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper and going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2(4), 301–323.
Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study. In L. C. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together (pp. 1–12). New York: Springer.
Perry, R., & Lewis, C. (2009). What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US? Journal of Educational Change, 10, 365–391.
Perry, R., & Lewis, C. (2010). Building demand for research through lesson study. In C. E. Coburn & M. K. Stein (Eds.), Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide (pp. 131–145). Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Spillane, J. P. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10(1), 63–87.
Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. I. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency’s capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185–203.
Stein, M. K., & Coburn, C. (2008). Architectures for learning: A comparative analysis of two urban school districts. American Journal of Education, 114, 583–626.
Stein, M. K., & D’Amico, L. (2002). Inquiry at the crossroads of policy and learning: A study of a district-wide literacy initiative. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1313–1344.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press, A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.
Sykes, G., O’Day, J., & Ford, T. (2009). The district role in instructional improvement. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 767–784). New York/London: Routledge.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top Program: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). School improvement grants. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/index.html
Yoshida, M. (2012). Mathematics lesson study in the United States. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 140–152.
Acknowledgments
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant DRL-1417585). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors thank Drs. Bob Floden, Miray Tekkumru Kisa, Catherine Lewis, Mary Kay Stein, and Paola Sztajn for their feedback on the manuscript. We also acknowledge the contributions of our graduate research assistants, Guillermo Farfan, Angelina Kuleshova, and Jennifer Fryer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Akiba, M., Murata, A., Howard, C., Wilkinson, B., Fabrega, J. (2019). Race to the Top and Lesson Study Implementation in Florida: District Policy and Leadership for Teacher Professional Development. In: Huang, R., Takahashi, A., da Ponte, J.P. (eds) Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04030-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04031-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)