Abstract
Lesson study, originating from East Asia, has been widely spread and accepted as a vehicle for teacher continuing professional development. With its features of openness (beginning with a question instead of an answer), involvement (driven by teachers rather than experts), dialogicality (reciprocal learning instead of hierarchical interpersonal relationships), and practicality (linking research and practice), lesson study contributes new energy to educational research. Finding an appropriate theoretical perspective to approach lesson study and glean its advantages is challenging. When cultural-historical activity theory is used to contextualize lesson study, numerous insights are gained by both teachers and researchers. This conceptual chapter introduces the use of cultural-historical activity theory as an analytical lens, followed by a brief overview of the commonalities of various modes of lesson study. Some central tenets of cultural-historical activity theory that echo the essential points of lesson study are elaborated. By collecting data for and analyzing a lesson study case involving an elementary mathematics lesson in Beijing, the author shows that cultural-historical activity theory illuminates the significance of lesson study at the ontological, epistemological, methodological, and axiological levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen, X. (2017). Theorizing Chinese lesson study from a cultural perspective. International Journal of Lesson and Learning Studies., 6(4), 283–292.
Chen, X., & Yang, F. (2013). Chinese teachers’ reconstruction of the curriculum reform through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2, 218–236.
Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where cultural and cognition create each other. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition (pp. 146–161). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davydov, V. V. (1999). The content and unsolved problems of activity theory. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinent, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 39–52). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Editorial Team. (2016). Mathematics (Grade4-Vol.2). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental work research as educational research. Nordisk Pedagogik: Journal of Nordic Educational Research, 16(5), 131–143.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.
Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1–2), 23–39.
Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2016). Studies in expansive learning: Learning what is not yet there. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). A. Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
Fang, Y. (2017). School-based teaching research and lesson-case study in mediating the second-cycle curriculum reform in Shanghai. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 293–305.
Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 16(1), 49–65.
Hart, L. C., Alston, A., & Murata, A. (Eds.). (2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together. Dordrecht: Springer.
Huang, R., & Shimizu, Y. (2016). Improving teaching, developing teachers and teacher developers, and linking theory and practice through lesson study in mathematics: An international perspective. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 48, 393–409.
Huang, R., Gong, Z., & Han, X. (2016). Implementing mathematics teaching that promotes students’ understanding through theory-driven lesson study. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 48, 425–439.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. London: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, C. K., & Lo, M. L. (2013). The role of lesson study in facilitating curriculum reforms. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2, 200–206.
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). The problem of activity and psychology. In A. N. Leont’ev (Ed.), Activity, consciousness, and personality (pp. 45–74). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools Inc.
Lewis, C. (2009). What is the nature of knowledge development in lesson study? Educational Action Research, 17, 95–110.
Lewis, C. (2015). What is improvement science? Do we need it in education? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–61.
Lewis, C. (2016). How does lesson study improve mathematics instruction? ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 571–580.
Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teacher College Record, 105(6), 913–945.
Lewis, C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinneman.
Il’enkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays in its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mosvold, R., & Bjuland, R. (2011). An activity theory view on learning studies. International Journal of Early Childhood, 43, 261–275.
Murata, A., Bofferding, L., Pothen, B., Taylor, M., & Wischnia, S. (2012). Making connections among student learning, content, and teaching: Teacher talk paths in elementary mathematics lesson study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43, 616–650.
OECD. (2017). Empowering and enabling teachers to improve equity and outcomes for all. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor–An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535–557.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576.
Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Another example of radical enhancement of students’ understanding of economic aspects of the world around them. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159–191.
Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2013). Interaction between the learners’ initial grasp of the object of learning and the learning resource afforded. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1065–1082.
Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2017). Chinese lesson study, learning study and keys to learning. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 336–347.
Scribner, S. (1997). A sociocultural approach to the study of mind). In E. Toback, R. J. Flamagne, M. B. Parlee, L. M. W. Martin, & A. S. Kapelman (Eds.), Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner (pp. 266–280). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.
Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
Tsui, A. B. M., & Law, D. Y. K. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school–university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1289–1301.
Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The change laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam: Sense.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wake, G., Swan, M., & Foster, C. (2016). Professional learning through the collaborative design of problem solving lessons. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 243–260.
Wei, G. (2017a). Review of learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Frontiers of Education in China, 12(1), 130–132.
Wei, G (2017b). Dynamics of teacher practical knowledge: From cultural-historical activity theoretical perspective (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Peking University.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods. New York: Springer.
Zhao, Y. (2014). Who’s afraid of the big bad dragon? Why China has the best (and worst) education system in the world. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Hong Kong Yuen Yuen Foundation (grant no. JY14003). I thank the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable feedback on the revisions of this paper. I would also like to thank Prof. Rongjin Huang from Middle Tennessee State University and Prof. Xiangming Chen from Peking University for their comments which contributed to the improvement of this article.
I would like to thank Anthony Abram for proofreading this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wei, G. (2019). How Could Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Inspire Lesson Study?. In: Huang, R., Takahashi, A., da Ponte, J.P. (eds) Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04030-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04031-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)