Skip to main content

A Case of Lesson Study in South Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

The Wits Maths Connect Secondary Project, a research-linked professional development project, included Lesson Study with teachers in school clusters. When two teachers shared their experiences of doing Lesson Study, they spoke spontaneously about how much they had learned about choosing and using examples in their teaching. Exemplification is a key element of the mathematics teaching framework developed in the project to support planning and reflection in our Lesson Study work. The teachers’ reflection suggested that working on examples had been enabling and empowering. We zoom in on one Lesson Study cycle with the same teachers to give meaning to what, how and why we work with examples in the way that we do and how our LS practices provide a supportive context for this work. Through this we build a case for a focus on exemplification when studying and working on mathematics teaching and for support at a more general level for theoretically informed Lesson Study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is a pseudonym, as are the names of other participants in the paper except the authors of this chapter.

  2. 2.

    Mason makes this point in an earlier version of the 2001 paper with the same title and available on his website.

  3. 3.

    In some papers, this is described as a 20-day course, 16 days on campus and 4 days in school work.

  4. 4.

    Sipho was present but not critically active in the group.

  5. 5.

    There are practical reasons for the unusual almost one-to-one relation between researchers and teachers. The second author was relatively new in the project, learning about LS, and so supported by the first author, the project director and another graduate student who had participated in a previous cycle.

  6. 6.

    The pre- and post-test data are not sufficiently rigorous to make claims about learners’ learning. The pre- and post-tests were used for teachers to see whether they had enabled learners to attend to the object of learning. In this particular case, it was evident across the scripts that most learners were able to correctly expand more expressions than in the pretest.

  7. 7.

    Elsewhere (Alshwaikh and Adler 2017b) we have discussed Thabi’s spontaneous example offered in the lesson. This incident introduced an error and much reflection by the LS group on what and how to deal with a teacher’s error during a lesson and our joint responsibility in this.

References

  • Adler, J. (2017). Mathematics discourse in instruction (MDI): A discursive resource as boundary object across practices. Paper presented at the 13th international congress on mathematical education, ICME-13, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2015). A framework for describing mathematics discourse in instruction and interpreting differences in teaching. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2015.1089677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2017a). Mathematical discourse in instruction matters. In J. Adler & A. Sfard (Eds.), Research for educational change: Transforming researchers’ insights into improvement in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 64–81). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2017b). A lesson to learn from: From research insights to teaching a lesson. In J. Adler & A. Sfard (Eds.), Research for educational change: Transforming researchers’ insights into improvement in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 133–143). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (in preparation). What changes in the quality of mathematics in instruction following teachers’ participation in subject matter focused professional development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Venkat, H. (2014). Teachers’ mathematical discourse in instruction: Focus on examples and explanations. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge: Windows into teacher thinking (pp. 132–146). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshwaikh, J., & Adler, J. (2017a). Researchers and teachers as learners in lesson study. In M. K. Mhlolo, S. N. Matoti, & B. Fredericks (Eds.), SAARMSTE book of long papers (pp. 2–14). Free State: Central University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshwaikh, J., & Adler, J. (2017b). Tensions and dilemmas as source of coherence. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Mathematics education and life at times of crisis: Proceedings of the ninth international mathematics education and society conference (V2) (pp. 370–381). Volos: University of Thessaly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonini, S., Presmeg, N., Mariotti, M. A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2011). On examples in mathematical thinking and learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(2), 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0334-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baba, T., & Nakai, K. (2011). Teachers’ institution and participation in a lesson Study Project in Zambia: Implication and Possibilities. Paper presented at the Africa-Asia University Dialogue for Educational Development. Report of the international experience sharing seminar (2). Actual Status and Issues of Teacher Professional Development. Retrieved from http://aadcice.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/e/publications/sosho4_2-06.pdf.

  • Benson, B., Mudenda, V., Tindi, E., & Nakai, K. (2014). Lesson study practice of science teachers in Zambia: Its effects, enhancing and hindering factors. In Pixel (Ed.), Conference proceedings: New perspectives in science education (pp. 473–477). Florence: libreriauniveritaria.it.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bills, L., & Watson, A. (2008). Editorial introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9147-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Ponte, J. P. (2017). Lesson studies in initial mathematics teacher education. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-08-2016-0021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. (1960). Building up mathematics. London: Hutchinson Educational Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, P. (2013). Teacher learning in lesson study: What interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. (2012). Developing a science of teaching through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251211224163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. B., Ozgur, Z., Vinsonhaler, R., Dogan, M. F., Carolan, T., Lockwood, E., Lynch, A., Sabouri, P., Knuth, E., & Zaslavsky, O. (in press). Student thinking with examples: The criteria-affordances-purposes-strategies framework. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.06.003.

  • Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248702237394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, T. (2014). Implementing Japanese lesson study in foreign countries: Misconceptions revealed. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 65–83 Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1046666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: A critical process of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, P., & Mason, J. (2008). Spreading light on and with example spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, F., & Gu, L. (2016). Characterizing mathematics teaching research specialists’ mentoring in the context of Chinese lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0756-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., & Shimizu, Y. (2016). Improving teaching, developing teachers and teacher educators, and linking theory and practice through lesson study in mathematics: An international perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0795-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Fang, Y., & Chen, X. (2017). Chinese lesson study: A deliberate practice, a research methodology, and an improvement science. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-08-2017-0037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jita, L. C., Maree, J. G., & Ndlalane, T. C. (2008). Lesson study (Jyugyo Kenkyu) from Japan to South Africa: A science and mathematics intervention program for secondary school teachers. In B. Atweh et al. (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 465–486). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullberg, A., Runesson, K., & Marton, F. (2017). What is made possible to learn when using the variation theory of learning in teaching mathematics? ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0858-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larssen, D. L. S., Cajkler, W., Mosvold, R., Bjuland, R., Helgevold, N., Fauskanger, J., & Norton, J. (2018). A literature review of lesson study in initial teacher education: Perspectives about learning and observation. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-06-2017-0030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. M. (2016). Learning to lead, leading to learn: How facilitators learn to lead lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0753-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2001). Tunja sequences as examples of employing students’ powers to generalize. The Mathematics Teacher, 94(3), 164–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murata, A., Bofferding, L., Pothen, B. E., Taylor, M. W., & Wischnia, S. (2012). Making connections among student learning, content, and teaching: Teacher talk paths in elementary mathematics lesson study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 616–650. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntow, F., & Adler, J. (2017). An exploration into teachers’ take up of professional development teaching resources. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 313–320). Singapore: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olteanu, L. (2017). Distributive law as object of learning through direct and inverse tasks. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2016-0014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, Y., & Ferreira, J. (2010). A case study of continuing teacher professional development through lesson study in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 30(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, J. (2016). Improving mathematics instruction and supporting teacher learning in Korea through lesson study using five practices. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0768-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pournara, C., Hodgen, J., Adler, J., & Pillay, V. (2015). Can improving teachers’ knowledge of mathematics lead to gains in learners’ attainment in mathematics? South African Journal of Education, 35(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n3a1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaresma, M., Winsløw, C., Clivaz, S., da Ponte, J. P., NĂ­ ShĂşilleabháin, A., & Takahashi, A. (Eds.). (2018). Mathematics lesson study around the world: Theoretical and methodological issues (ICMI-13 monographs). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runesson, U. (2006). What is it possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600823753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuilleabhain, A. N. (2016). Developing mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in lesson study: Case study findings. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(3), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-11-2015-0036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, N., Watson, A., Zazkis, R., & Mason, J. (2011). The structuring of personal example spaces. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, A. (2014). The role of the knowledgeable other in lesson study: Examining the final comments of experienced lesson study practitioners. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: Maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0752-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkat, H., & Adler, J. (2012). Coherence and connections in teachers’ mathematical discourses in instruction. Pythagoras, 33(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i3.188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0802_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, K. (2017). Is there really any difference between lesson and learning study? Both focus on neriage. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(2), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2017-0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, K. (2018). The many faces of lesson study and learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2017-0047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, M. (2012). Mathematics lesson study in the United States: Current status and ideas for conducting high quality and effective lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251211224181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (in press). There is more to examples than meets the eye: Thinking with and through mathematical examples in different settings. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.10.001.

  • Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Characteristics of teachers’ choice of examples in and for the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9140-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is based on the research supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation (Grant No. 71218). Any opinion, finding and conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the author(s), and the NRF does not accept any liability in this regard.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Adler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adler, J., Alshwaikh, J. (2019). A Case of Lesson Study in South Africa. In: Huang, R., Takahashi, A., da Ponte, J.P. (eds) Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04030-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04031-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics