Abstract
This article analyzes how a referendum is represented through the use of conceptual metaphors in two major newspapers in Taiwan, the Liberty Times and the United Daily News. The analysis indicates that a general schema for the referendum a causer causes an object to move or stop, which is further divided to the forward-moving and stopping sub-schemas, can be retrieved from the metaphors used. Moreover, it shows that three expressions for the forward-moving sub-schema, as lexicalized in the legislation domain, are predominant in the representation of the referendum. With the inevitability to use the general schema, the two newspapers take strategies to elaborate or neutralize the effects embedded in the schema, so as to transmit their respective political stances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The wording of the referendum question, National Referendum Proposal No. 5, is translated by Lu [9] as follows: In 1971, the People’s Republic of China joined the United Nations, replacing the Republic of China and making Taiwan an international orphan. Do you agree that the government, in a strong expression of the will of the Taiwanese people and in order to elevate Taiwan’s international status and promote its international participation, should join the United Nations under the name ‘Taiwan’?
- 2.
The Word Sketch of the Sketch Engine (https://the.sketchengine.co.uk/ipauth/) presents how a word behave, e.g. as a subject or an object, in a sentence. According to the Word Sketch of the Chinese Gigaword, the grammatical objects of
include
‘democratic reforms’,
‘constitutional reform’,
‘policy’,
‘scheme’,
‘plan’,
‘bill’, etc., and the grammatical subject of this process includes the unit of legislation or implementation: e.g.
‘government’,
‘ministries and councils’, etc. The grammatical subjects of
‘to pass (through)’ contain
‘bill’,
‘statute’,
‘amendment’,
‘resolution’,
‘draft’, etc. Regarding
‘to pass the pass’, expressions in the lawmaking field such as
‘extension case’,
‘reconsideration case’, etc., are dominant. It is obvious that these three lexemes are widely used and lexicalized in the legislation domain.
include
‘democratic reforms’,
‘constitutional reform’,
‘policy’,
‘scheme’,
‘plan’,
‘bill’, etc., and the grammatical subject of this process includes the unit of legislation or implementation: e.g.
‘government’,
‘ministries and councils’, etc. The grammatical subjects of
‘to pass (through)’ contain
‘bill’,
‘statute’,
‘amendment’,
‘resolution’,
‘draft’, etc. Regarding
‘to pass the pass’, expressions in the lawmaking field such as
‘extension case’,
‘reconsideration case’, etc., are dominant. It is obvious that these three lexemes are widely used and lexicalized in the References
Charteris-Black, J.: Britain as a container: immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse Soc. 17, 563–581 (2006)
Chiang, W.-y., Duann, R.-f.: Conceptual metaphors for SARS: ‘war’ between whom? Discourse Soc. 18, 579–602 (2007)
Su, H.-y.: Fourth estate and public interest: news media in the Post War Taiwan, 1949–2004 (
, 1949 ~ 2004). M.A. Thesis, National Taiwan University (2004)Liao, F.-T.: Name rectification of Taiwan: the analysis of international dimension (
. Think Tank Forum of New Century 19, 11–20 (2002)Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
Chilton, P., Lakoff, G.: Foreign policy by metaphor. In: Schaffner, C., Wenden, A.L. (eds.) Language and Peace, pp. 37–59. Harwood Academic Publishers, Singapore (1995)
Mio, J.S.: Metaphor and politics. Metaphor Symb. 12, 113–133 (1997)
Semino, E.: Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Lu, M.: Referendum: referendums fail to meet thresholds. Taipei Times, Sunday, March 23, 6 (2008)
Pragglejaz Group: MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor Symb. 22, 1–40 (2007)
Huang, C.-R.: Tagged Chinese Gigaword Verion 2.0. Lexical Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (2009)
, 1949 ~ 2004). M.A. Thesis, National Taiwan University (2004)
. Think Tank Forum of New Century 19, 11–20 (2002)Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Prof. Meichun Liu and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions. The second author would like to acknowledge partial funding support from Hong Kong University Grant Council General Research Fund Grant #1240014. All remaining errors are our own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Duann, Rf., Ahrens, K., Huang, CR. (2018). A Referendum Is a Forward-Moving Object or a Bundled Object?. In: Hong, JF., Su, Q., Wu, JS. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11173. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04015-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04015-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04014-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04015-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)