Abstract
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has become a popular concept employed in courses occurring in primary, secondary, and higher education learning environments. There has been a movement with regard to the development of instructional content and practice to interject the arts into STEM course activities. This introduction of arts, or more appropriately creativity into traditionally left brain processes, results in a different cognitive approach for completing these STEM activities. The notion of STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) is an emerging discipline that is unique in its desire to provide a well-rounded approach at instruction. Namely, STEAM offers a means by which students can further their understandings of analytical concepts through the use of creativity. This chapter seeks to examine the impact that creativity and the arts have on traditional STEM courses. This includes an investigation of the effectiveness of the arts in creating creative solutions when presented with STEM-centric problems and course assignments. Other areas of this chapter will include an investigation into the attitudes of the students toward STEAM activities and this new approach to teaching subjects devoid of creative artistic solutions such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The conclusion of this chapter will focus on three important subject areas that include the theories and practices employed in STEAM courses, as well as discussing the future of this emerging discipline.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Advancing Student Learning. (n.d.). Columbia University. Retrieved November 29, 2018, from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/provost/midstates/docs/AdvancingSL.pdf
Ahn, H. S., & Choi, Y. M. (2015). Analysis on the effects of the augmented reality-based STEAM program on education. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 92, 125–130.
Arnold, B., & Reeves, J. (2014). Translating best practices for student engagement to online STEAM courses. In Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference, Long Beach CA.
Art could help create a better ‘STEM’ student. (2013, December 3). Retrieved March 1, 2017, from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131203091633.htm
Atkinson, R. D., & Mayo, M. J. (2010). Refueling the US innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education.
Autry, L. L., & Walker, M. E. (2011). Artistic representation: Promoting student creativity and self-reflection. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 6(1), 42–55.
Bequette, J., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40–47.
Callahan, D. (2014). The importance of being creative. The STEAM Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20140102.4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/steam/vol1/iss2/4. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
Clinton, G., & Hokanson, B. (2012). Creativity in the training and practice of instructional designers: The Design/Creativity Loops model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 111–130.
Developing STEAM Education to Improve Students’ Innovative Ability. (2016, October 10). Retrieved November 29, 2018, from https://steamedu.com/developing-steam-education-to-improve-students-innovative-ability/
Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. In 6th Biennial international conference on technology education research, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Feldman, A. (2015). Why we need to put the arts into STEM education. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/06/steam_vs_stem_why_we_need_to_put_the_arts_into_stem_education.html
Fulton, L. A., & Simpson-Steele, J. (2016). Reconciling the divide: Common processes in science and arts education. The STEAM Journal, 2(2), 3.
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012a). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012b). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19.
Hargrove, R. (2012). Fostering creativity in the design studio: A framework towards effective pedagogical practices. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 10(1), 7–31.
Helfferich, D., Dawe, J., Tarnai, N. (2014). STEAMpower: Inspiring students, teachers, and the public. AFES Miscellaneous Publication MP 2014-13. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
Huang, T. L., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: The moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269–295.
Jolly, A. (2014). STEM vs. STEAM: Do the arts belong. Education Week. p. 18.
Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552.
Lewontin, M. (2015). How efforts to combine arts with STEM education could improve tech diversity. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/1216/How-efforts-to-combine-arts-with-STEM-education-could-improve-tech-diversity
Lichtenberg, J., Woock, C., & Wright, M. (2008). Ready to innovate: Are educators and executives aligned on the creative readiness of the US workforce? New York: Conference Board.
Lo, C. C. (2010). How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 47–54.
Lonka, K., & Cho, V. (2015). Innovative schools: Teaching & learning in the digital era (European parliament, directorate-general for internal policies, culture and education). Brussels, Belgium: Policy Department – European Union.
Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., et al. (2013). Rethinking STEM education: An interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541–546.
Maeda, J. (2013). STEM+ Art= Steam. The STEAM Journal, 1(1), 34.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report.
Mishra, P., & Henriksen, D. (2013). A new approach to defining and measuring creativity: Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century. TechTrends, 57(5), 10.
Robinson, C., & Baxter, S. (2013). Turning STEM into STEAM. Age, 23, 1.
STEAM Programs. (n.d.). Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://uwl-web.com/integrated/?page_id=108
Taylor, P. C. (2016). Session N: Why is a STEAM curriculum perspective crucial to the 21st century?
Thurley, C. W. (2016). Infusing the arts into science and the sciences into the arts: An argument for interdisciplinary STEAM in higher education pathways. The STEAM Journal, 2(2), 18.
Tsoupikova, D., Silva, B., Kostis, H., Shah, T. (2014). Girls steaming to practicing STEAM: The powers of new media arts for engaging girls in STEM. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://median.newmediacaucus.org/caa-edition/girls-steaming-to-practicing-steam-the-powers-of-new-media-arts-for-engaging-girls-in-stem/
White, H. (2010). Science, technology, engineering, art, mathematics. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://steam-notstem.com/
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49.
Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. In Pupils’ attitudes towards technology (PATT-19) conference: Research on technology, innovation, design & engineering teaching, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marmon, M. (2019). The Emergence of the Creativity in STEM: Fostering an Alternative Approach for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Instruction Through the Use of the Arts. In: Khine, M.S., Areepattamannil, S. (eds) STEAM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04002-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04003-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)