Skip to main content

Adaptive Reference Point Generation for Many-Objective Optimization Using NSGA-III

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11320))

Abstract

In Non Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-III (NSGA-III), the diversity of solutions is guided by a set of uniformly distributed reference points in the objective space. However, uniformly distributed reference points may not be efficient for problems with disconnected and non-uniform Pareto-fronts. These kinds of problems may have some reference points that are never associated with any of the Pareto-optimal solutions and will become useless reference points during evaluation. The existence of these useless reference points in NSGA-III significantly affects its performance. To address this issue, a new reference points adaptation mechanism is proposed that generates reference points according to the distribution of the candidate solutions. The use of this proposed adaptation method improves the performance of evolutionary search and promotes population diversity for better exploration. The proposed approach is evaluated on a number of unconstrained benchmark problems and is compared with NSGA-III and other reference point adaptation approaches. Experiment results on several benchmark problems clearly show a prominent improvement in the performance by using the proposed reference point adaptation mechanism in NSGA-III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chand, S., Wagner, M.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: a quick-start guide. Surv. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 20(2), 35–42 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, R., et al.: A benchmark test suite for evolutionary many-objective optimization. Complex Intell. Syst. 3(1), 67–81 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Das, I., Dennis, J.E.: Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. 8(3), 631–657 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Jain, H.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 577–601 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E.: Scalable multi-objectove optimization test problems. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 825–830. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. López Jaimes, A., Coello Coello, C.A.: Many-objective problems: challenges and methods. In: Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence, pp. 1033–1046. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43505-2_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jain, H., Deb, K.: An improved adaptive approach for elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for many-objective optimization. In: Purshouse, R.C., Fleming, P.J., Fonseca, C.M., Greco, S., Shaw, J. (eds.) EMO 2013. LNCS, vol. 7811, pp. 307–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37140-0_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, H., Deb, K.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point based nondominated sorting approach, part II: handling constraints and extending to an adaptive approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 602–622 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, S., Yang, S.: A strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm based on reference direction for multiobjective and many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 21(3), 329–346 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, B., Li, J., Tang, K., Yao, X.: Many-objective evolutionary algorithms: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 48(1), 13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Y., Gong, D., Sun, X., Zhang, Y.: A reference points-based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1053–1056. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masood, A., Chen, G., Mei, Y., Zhang, M.: Reference point adaption method for genetic programming hyper-heuristic in many-objective job shop scheduling. In: Liefooghe, A., López-Ibáñez, M. (eds.) EvoCOP 2018. LNCS, vol. 10782, pp. 116–131. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77449-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Masood, A., Mei, Y., Chen, G., Zhang, M.: Many-objective genetic programming for job-shop scheduling. In: IEEE WCCI 2016 Conference Proceedings. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Masood, A., Mei, Y., Chen, G., Zhang, M.: A PSO-based reference point adaption method for genetic programming hyper-heuristic in many-objective job shop scheduling. In: Wagner, M., Li, X., Hendtlass, T. (eds.) ACALCI 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10142, pp. 326–338. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51691-2_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Q., Zhou, A., Zhao, S., Suganthan, P.N., Liu, W., Tiwari, S.: Multiobjective optimization test instances for the CEC 2009 special session and competition. Technical report, University of Essex, Colchester, UK and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Special Session on Performance Assessment of Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms, pp. 1–30 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., Da Fonseca, V.G.: Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atiya Masood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Masood, A., Chen, G., Mei, Y., Zhang, M. (2018). Adaptive Reference Point Generation for Many-Objective Optimization Using NSGA-III. In: Mitrovic, T., Xue, B., Li, X. (eds) AI 2018: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03991-2_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03991-2_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03990-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03991-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics