Skip to main content

Intervention-Oriented Designs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Designing Social Science Research
  • 821 Accesses

Abstract

In the present chapter I discuss two types of intervention-oriented designs by looking at purpose and strategies in evaluation research and action research. My main argument is that comprehensive evaluations of interventions and measures must combine studies of process and effect. Measures, interventions, and reforms in society build on a more or less explicit theory of action about the effects of the measure. To evaluate the measures, we need to know something about the effects, and this can best be done through a variable-centred effect study with a control group. However, in order to develop knowledge about why the action succeeded or failed in producing the expected effects, we also need to analyse the underlying theories of action and implementation processes. Therefore, it is possible to talk about intervention-oriented designs as combinations of process-oriented and effect-oriented analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andreassen, T. A., & Aars, J. (2015). Den store reformen: da NAV ble til. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duus, G., Husted, M., Kildedal, K., Laursen, E., & Tofteng, D. (2012). Aktionsforskning. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland, O. (1997). Erfaring, dialogikk og politikk: den antikke dialogfilosofiens betydning for rekonstruksjonen av moderne empirisk samfunnsvitenskap: et begrepshistorisk og filosofisk bidrag. In ([3. utg]. ed., Vol. 11). Oslo: Det historisk-filosofiske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland, O., & Nicolini, D. (2011). Turning practically: Broadening the horizon. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111119744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, O. (2000). Evaluering – samfunnsforskning i politikkens tjeneste. In O. Foss & J. Mønnesland (Eds.), Evaluering av offentlig virksomhet. Metoder og vurderinger. Oslo, Norway: NIBR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. F. (2005). Choosing evaluation models: A discussion on evaluation design. Evaluation, 11(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389005060265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. A. (2012). Aktionsforskningens historie – på vej til et refleksivt akademisk selskap. In G. Duus, M. Husted, K. Kildedal, E. Laursen, & D. Tofteng (Eds.), Aktionsforskning (pp. 19–36). Fredriksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øvretveit, J. (1990). Quality health services. London: Brunel Institute of Organisation and Social Studies, Brunel University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resaland, G. K., Moe, V. F., Aadland, E., Steene-Johannessen, J., Glosvik, Ø., Andersen, J. R., et al. (2015). Active Smarter Kids (ASK): Rationale and design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of daily physical activity on children’s academic performance and risk factors for non-communicable diseases. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 709. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2049-y

  • Ricoeur, P. (1988 (1986)). Det praktiske förnuftet. In Från text till handling: en antologi om hermeneutik (Orig.: Du texte à l’action, Essais d’hermenutiques) (Vol. 1, pp. 167–205). Stockholm: Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsrud, E., & Emery, F. E. (1970). Mot en ny bedriftsorganisasjon: eksperimenter i industrielt demokrati (Ny utg. ed. Vol. 2). Oslo: Tanum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornes, K. (2012). Evaluering i teori og praksis. Trondheim, Norway: Akademika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E. (2009). Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning (3. uppl. ed.). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bukve, O. (2019). Intervention-Oriented Designs. In: Designing Social Science Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03979-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics