Skip to main content

Memory and Memorialisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Fall of France in the Second World War
  • 404 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that the ‘syndrome of 1940’ (the set of symptoms of the traumatic effects of the defeat of 1940) is less visible than the well-known Vichy syndrome,  because the painful memories of the defeat have been repressed. Moreover, the defeat of 1940 has never been commemorated by the French state. And yet the memory surfaces as the ever-present evidence of the humiliation felt by the French people. Will the new academic consensus on the causes of the military defeat temper this sense of humiliation? Will it heal the syndrome of 1940?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Patrick Finney (2011) Remembering the Road to World War Two: International History, National Identity, Collective Memory (London: Routledge), 179.

  2. 2.

    Robert Frank (2014) La hantise du déclin: La France de 1914 à 2014 (Paris: Belin), 203–221; Henry Rousso (1991) The Vichy Syndrome: History and Memory in France Since 1944 (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press).

  3. 3.

    See also Eric Conan and Henry Rousso (1998) Vichy: An Ever Present Past (Hanover, NH and London: University Press of New England).

  4. 4.

    Richard J. Golsan (2006) ‘The Legacy of World War II: Mapping the Discourse of Memory’, in Richard Ned Lebow, Wulf Kansteiner, and Claudio Fogu (eds.), The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe (Durham and London: Duke University Press), 73–101.

  5. 5.

    Gilles Vergnon and Yves Santamaria (eds.) (2015) Le syndrome de 1940: Un trou noir mémoriel? (Paris: Riveneuve).

  6. 6.

    Rpbert J. Young (1996) France and the Origins of the Second World War (Basingstoke: Macmillan), 42–43.

  7. 7.

    Cited in Rousso, The Vichy Syndrome, 279.

  8. 8.

    Stanley Hoffmann (1998) ‘The Trauma of 1940: A Disaster and Its Traces’, in Joel Blatt (ed.) The French Defeat of 1940: Reassessments (Providence and Oxford: Berghahn), 355–359.

  9. 9.

    Robert Gildea (2009) ‘Eternal France: Crisis and National Self-Perception in France 1870–2005’, in Susana Carvalho and François Gemenne (eds.), Nations and Their Histories: Constructions and Representations (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 140.

  10. 10.

    Frank , La Hantise, 203–221.

  11. 11.

    Yves Santamaria , ‘France, où est ta défaite? Actualité de Mai-juin 1940 du GPRF à Georges Pompidou 1944–1974’, in Vergnon and Santamaria , Le syndrome de 1940, 117–134.

  12. 12.

    Frank , La Hantise, 203–221.

  13. 13.

    Gilles Vergnon, ‘“Nous sommes le 9 mai 1940”: Anamnèses récentes de la défaite de Mai-Juin 1940 (1980–2010)’, in Vergnon, Santamaria , Le syndrome de 1940, 135–154.

  14. 14.

    Serge Barcellinin, ‘Les associations d’anciens combattants de 1940’, in Vergnon, Santamaria , Le syndrome de 1940, 165–194.

  15. 15.

    Gilles Ragache (2010) La fin de la campagne de France: les combats oubliés de l’Armée du Centre 15 juin-25 juin 1940 (Paris: Economica), VII–VIII.

  16. 16.

    Quoted in Julian Jackson (2003) The Fall of France: The Nazi Invasion of 1940 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 229.

  17. 17.

    Geoff Eley (1997) ‘Foreword’, in Martin Evans and Ken Lunn (eds.), War and Memory in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Berg), ix.

  18. 18.

    Martin S. Alexander (1992) The Republic in Danger: General Maurice Gamelin and the Politics of French Defence 19331940 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 378.

  19. 19.

    Jay Winter and Emmanuel Sivan (eds.) (1999) War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1, 8.

  20. 20.

    Finney , Remembering the Road, 14–15; Stefan Berger, ‘The Comparative History of National Historiographies in Europe: Some Methodological Reflections and Preliminary Results’, in Carvalho, Gemenne, Nations and Their Histories, 32.

  21. 21.

    John Breuilly , ‘Nationalism and the Making of National Pasts’, in Carvalho and Gemenne. Nations and Their Histories, 21.

  22. 22.

    Jacques Belle (2007) La Défaite française: un désastre évitable 1: Le 16 mai 1940: il fallait rester en Belgique (Paris: Economica), IX.

  23. 23.

    Maurice Vaïsse (2015) ‘Conclusions: Un trou mémoriel?’, in Vergnon, Santamaria , Le syndrome de 1940, 297–301.

Bibliography

  • Alexander M. (1992) The Republic in Danger: General Maurice and the Politics of French Defence 1933–1940 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belle J. (2007/2014) La Défaite française: un désastre évitable, volume 1 Le 16 mai 1940: il fallait rester en Belgique; volume 2 Le 16 juin 1940: Non à l’armistice! (Paris: Economica).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt J. (ed.) (1998) The French Defeat of 1940: Reassessments (Providence and Oxford: Berghahn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho S. and F. Gemenne (eds.) (2009) Nations and Their Histories: Constructions and Representations (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conan E. and H. Rousso (1998) Vichy: An Ever Present Past (Hanover, NH and London: University Press of New England).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans M. and K. Lunn (eds.) (1997) War and Memory in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Berg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney P. (2011) Remembering the Road to World War Two: International History, National Identity, Collective Memory (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frank R. (2014) La hantise du déclin: La France de 1914 à 2014 (Paris: Belin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J. (2003) The Fall of France: The Nazi Invasion of 1940 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow R., W. Kansteiner, and C. Fogu (eds.) (2006) The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe (Durham and London: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragache G. (2010) La Fin de la Campagne de France: les combats oubliés de l’Armée du Centre 15 juin-25 juin 1940 (Paris: Economica).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousso H. (1986) Le Syndrome de Vichy (Paris: Seuil).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousso H. (1991) The Vichy Syndrome: History and Memory in France Since 1944 (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnon, Gilles and Yves Santamaria (eds.) (2015) Le syndrome de 1940: Un trou noir mémoriel? (Paris: Riveneuve).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter J. and E. Sivan (eds.) (1999) War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young R. (1996) France and the Origins of the Second World War (Basingstoke: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Carswell .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carswell, R. (2019). Memory and Memorialisation. In: The Fall of France in the Second World War. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03955-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03955-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03954-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03955-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics