Advertisement

The European Perspective

  • Jonathan WheatleyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to address whether or not the increased salience of the cultural dimension that we observe in Britain is shared elsewhere in Europe. I first look at earlier studies that have been carried out on other European cases, both with regard to patterns of political competition overall and with regard to how recent changes have affected the party system. I then draw on a new source of opinion data, provided by the Voting Advice Application EUvox from across Europe, to identify the most salient political dimensions. I find that the pattern of political competition that we observed in Britain in Chapter  3 is shared by many Northern European countries and find marked similarities between the party systems of Britain, Denmark and France in terms of the positions that party voters occupy in the three countries with respect to the most salient dimensions.

Keywords

European political parties “winners” and “losers” of globalisation Electoral systems Populist right parties 

References

  1. Bale, T., Green-Pedersen, C., Krouwel, A., Luther, K. R., & Sitter, N. (2010). If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe. Political Studies, 58(3), 410–426.Google Scholar
  2. Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H., & Kriesi, H. (2015). Introduction: The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. In P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism (pp. 1–64). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Edles, L. D. (1998). Symbol and Ritual in the New Spain: The Transition to Democracy After Franco. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Häusermann, S., & Kriesi, H. (2015). What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-Level Preferences and Party Choice. In P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism (pp. 202–230). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henjak, A. (2010). Political Cleavages and Socio-economic Context: How Welfare Regimes and Historical Divisions Shape Political Cleavages. West European Politics, 33(3), 474–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  9. Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (pp. 1–64). New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
  11. Mendez, F., & Manavopoulos, V. (2018). EUvox2014: Voting Advice Application Data for the 2014 European Parliament elections [Data file and codebook]. Available from GESIS Datorium.  https://doi.org/10.7802/1750.
  12. Otjes, S., & Katsanidou, A. (2017). Beyond Kriesiland: EU Integration as a Super Issue After the Eurocrisis. European Journal of Political Research, 56(2), 301–319.Google Scholar
  13. Wheatley, J., & Mendez, F. (forthcoming). Reconceptualising Dimensions of Political Competition in Europe: A Demand Side Approach. British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations