Abstract
Having engaged with the historical contextualisation of same-sex relationships and relevant literature in Chapters One and Two, key findings of research conducted are discussed in Chapters Three and Four respectively. In order to understand the complexities and dynamics of interracial gay households in the South African context, this chapter engages with the relationship formation, division of labour and power relations, amongst gay couples. The main channels through which gay partners initiated their relationships were physical face-to-face encounters or social engagements and online dating. The impact of personal resources, such as income, education and race, were examined in the initial coming together of the couples but none of this had any significant influence on their familial arrangements. This chapter also examines how gay couples share housework and participate in the management of domestic duties. In this latter regard, no distinctive hierarchical divisions of labour amongst the participants were evident, notwithstanding their racial backgrounds and differential earnings. Lastly, this chapter suggests that scholars, gender and family experts, should pay attention to how gay partners are resisting and ‘redoing gender’ in their relationships, and theorise gay partners’ experiences distinctively rather than looking at them through a heterosexual lens. Overall, this chapter discusses the formation of relationships, division of household labour, how power is negotiated and what sustains intimacy in interracial gay partnerships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adeagbo, O. (2015). ‘Do according to your time, preferences and abilities’: Exploring the division of household labour among interracial gay partners in post-apartheid South Africa. South African Review of Sociology, 46, 39–58.
Adeagbo, O. (2016). ‘Love beyond colour’: The formation of interracial gay men’s intimate relationships in post-apartheid South Africa. National Identities, 18, 241–264.
Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. A. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Andersson, G., Noack, T., Seierstad, A., & Weedon-Fekjaer, H. (2006). The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden. Demography, 43, 79–98.
Barraket, J., & Henry-Waring, M. S. (2008). Getting it on (line): Sociological perspectives on e-dating. Journal of Sociology, 44, 149–165.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York: William Morrow and Company.
Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brown, G., Maycock, B., & Burns, S. (2005). Your picture is your bait: Use and meaning of cyberspace among gay men. Journal of sex research, 42, 63–73.
Carey, R. (1996). Betwixt and between: An organization’s relationship with online communications. SIECUS Report, 25, 8–9.
Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81–99.
Chesters, J. (2012). Gender attitudes and housework: Trends over time in Australia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43, 511–526.
Connell, R. W. (2000). Understanding men: Gender sociology and the New International Research on Masculinities. Clark Lecture, University of Kansas Department of Sociology.
December, J. (1996). Units of analysis for Internet communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC), 1, 143.
Dunne, G. A. (1997). Lesbian lifestyles: Women’s work and the politics of sexuality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Dunne, G. A. (1998). Introduction: Add sexuality and stir: Towards a broader understanding of the gender dynamics of work and family life. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 2, 1–8.
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course. USA: Springer.
Fitch, C. A., & Ruggles, S. (2000). Historical trends in marriage formation: The United States 1850–1990. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 59–88). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.
Gephart, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1997). Power strategies in romantic relationships. In American Psychological Association Conference, Chicago, IL.
Goldberg, A. E. (2013). “Doing” and “Undoing” gender: The meaning and division of housework in same-sex couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 85–104.
Goldberg, A. E., Smith, J. Z., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2012). The division of labor in lesbian, gay, and heterosexual new adoptive parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 812–828.
Gonzaga, G. (2011). How you meet your spouse matters. Retrieved May 12, 2014.
Grote, N. K., & Clark, M. S. (2001). Perceiving unfairness in the family: Cause or consequence of marital distress? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 281.
Grote, N. K., Naylor, K. E., & Clark, M. S. (2002). Perceiving the division of family work to be unfair: Do social comparisons, enjoyment, and competence matter? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 510–522.
Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276–297.
Harry, J. (1984). Gay couples. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Harry, J., & DeVall, W. B. (1978). The social organization of gay males. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., Browner, C. H., & Sherman, C. A. (2002). Relationship power, decision making, and sexual relations: An exploratory study with couples of Mexican origin. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 284–291.
Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100, 130–163.
Hook, J. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660.
Huston, T. L. (2002). Power. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berschied, A. Christensen, et al. (Eds.), Close relationships. New York: Percheron Press.
Huston, M., & Schwartz, P. (1995). The relationships of lesbians and of gay men. In S. Duck & J. Wood (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). “His” and “her” relationships? A review of the empirical evidence. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jepsen, L. K., & Jepsen, C. A. (2002). An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples. Demography, 39, 435–453.
Jepsen, C. A., & Jepsen, L. K. (2006). The sexual division of labor within households: Comparisons of couples to roommates. Eastern Economic Journal, 32, 299–312.
Kurdek, L. A. (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 880–900.
Kurdek, L. A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 251–254.
Kurdek, L. A. (2006). Differences between partners from heterosexual, gay, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 509–528.
Kurdek, L. A. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 132–148.
Levine, S. (1992). Clinical life: A clinicians guide. New York: Plenum Press.
Lubbe, C. (2007). Mothers, fathers or parents: Same-gendered families in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 260–283.
Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. (2006). Online dating: Americans who are seeking romance use the Internet to help them in their search, but there is still widespread public concern about the safety of online dating. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
McWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple: How relationships develop. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
McWilliams, S., & Barrett, A. E. (2014). Online dating in middle and later life: Gendered expectations and experiences. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 411–436.
Merkle, E. R., & Richardson, R. A. (2000). Digital dating and virtual relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships. Family Relations, 49, 187–192.
Milani, T. M. (2013). Are ‘queers’ really ‘queer’? Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society, 24, 615–633.
Miller, S., & Perlman, D. (2009). Intimate relationship. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Naidoo, K., Smit, R., & Seedat-Khan, M. (2012). Gender politics and work-family integration: Persisting exclusions at two South African universities. In T. Uys & S. Patel (Eds.), Exclusion, social capital and citizenship: Contested transitions in South Africa and India. New Delhi: Orient Black Swan.
Oerton, S. (1997). “Queer housewives?”: Some problems in theorising the division of domestic labour in lesbian and gay households. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 421–430.
Osmond, M. W., & Thorne, B. (1993). Feminist theories: The social construction of gender in families and society. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach. New York: Plenum.
Öun, I. (2013). Is it fair to share? Perceptions of fairness in the division of housework among couples in 22 countries. Social Justice Research, 26, 400–421.
Peplau, L. A., & Cochran, S. D. (1980). Sex differences in values concerning love relationships. In Annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.
Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. W. (2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 405–424.
Peplau, L. A., & Spalding, L. R. (2000). The close relationships of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Perlesz, A., Power, J., Brown, R., McNair, R., Schofield, M., Pitts, M., et al. (2010). Organising work and home in same-sex parented families: Findings from the work love play study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 374–391.
Pitt, R. N., & Borland, E. (2009). Bachelorhood and men’s attitudes about gender roles. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 140–158.
Pratto, F., & Walker, A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender. New York: Guilford Press.
Rabin, C., & Shapira-Berman, O. (1997). Egalitarianism and marital happiness: Israeli wives and husbands on a collision course? American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 319–330.
Recio, E. M. (2000). A unified theory on homosexual identity. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
Reilly, M. E., & Lynch, J. M. (1990). Power-sharing in lesbian partnerships. Journal of Homosexuality, 19, 1–30.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual communication: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Robnett, B., & Feliciano, C. (2011). Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Social Forces, 89, 807–828.
Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2010). How couples meet and stay together, Wave 2 version 2.04. In Machine Readable Data File. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries. http://data.stanford.edu/hcmst.
Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547.
Sautter, J. M., Tippett, R. M., & Philip Morgan, S. (2010). The social demography of Internet dating in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 554–575.
Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage: How love between equals really works. New York: Free Press.
Shechory, M., & Ziv, R. (2007). Relationships between gender role attitudes, role division, and perception of equity among heterosexual, gay and lesbian couples. Sex Roles, 56, 629–638.
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379.
Stacey, J. (2004). Cruising to familyland: Gay hypergamy and rainbow kinship. Current Sociology, 52, 181–197.
Stacey, J. (2005). The families of man: Gay male intimacy and kinship in a global metropolis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1911–1935.
Stacey, J. (2006). Gay parenthood and the decline of paternity as we knew it. Sexualities, 9, 27–55.
Stephure, R. J., Boon, S. D., MacKinnon, S. L., & Deveau, V. L. (2009). Internet initiated relationships: Associations between age and involvement in online dating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 658–681.
Tasker, F. (2002). Lesbian and gay parenting. In A. Coyle & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: New perspectives. London: Blackwell.
Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037.
Veniegas, R. C., & Peplau, L. A. (1997). Power and the quality of same-sex friendships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 279–296.
Walker, A. J. (1996). Couples watching television: Gender, power, and the remote control. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 813–823.
Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473–501.
Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 227–252.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society, 23, 112–122.
Williams, M. (1996). Intimacy and the Internet. Contemporary Sexuality, 30, 1–11.
Wong, D. (2012). Doing gender, doing culture: Division of domestic labour among lesbians in Hong Kong. Women’s Studies International Forum, 35, 266–275. Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adeagbo, O. (2019). Relationship Formation, Division of Housework and Power Negotiation. In: The Dynamics and Complexities of Interracial Gay Families in South Africa: A New Frontier. SpringerBriefs in Sociology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03922-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03922-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03921-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03922-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)