Skip to main content

Advancing Age-Friendly Workplaces Through the NIOSH National Center for Productive Aging and Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Rehabilitation in Older Adults

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability ((SHHDW))

Abstract

The workforce in the USA and other industrialized countries is aging, mainly because of increased life expectancy, the presence of the “baby boom” generation, and declining fertility rates. Moreover, emerging trends, such as the shift toward nonstandard or contingent work arrangements and the erosion of defined-benefit plans, will require workers to prolong their stay in the workforce. Hence, understanding the safety and health needs of aging workers is a necessity, not only to better protect and advance the safety, health, and well-being of those who work into later life but also to take advantage of the important contributions that older individuals can make to their employers and society as a whole. The National Institute for Occupational Safety (NIOSH) has long recognized the growing need to examine the impact of age-related changes on the occupational safety and health (OSH) outcomes and well-being of aging workers. In 2015, NIOSH launched the National Center for Productive Aging and Work (NCPAW). Drawing from the concept of productive aging and adapting it to OSH, NCPAW seeks to advance the safety, health, and lifelong well-being of workers of all ages. This mission can be accomplished through the support of safe and healthy work environments for everyone through comprehensive strategies that allow workers to be safe, healthy, and productive at all ages. The purpose of this chapter is to explore the productive aging concept as it applies to workers of all ages. This chapter also applies this concept to workers’ personal and professional development and their contributions to their organizations as they transition throughout the life cycle. Then the chapter discusses productive aging as a guiding framework for “age-friendly” workplaces. Finally, the chapter provides an overview of NCPAW’s approach to productive aging in the context of occupational safety and health (OSH) and its research and practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors acknowledge that life-span and life course are sometimes used interchangeably, but that the two terms originate from different disciplines. Life-span, a term from psychology, emphasizes heterogeneity across older individuals and the importance of plasticity and within-individual change. Life course, a sociological term, focuses on events at the macro level, studying the effect of groups, organizations, and institutions on the lives of individuals; principal considerations include social factors such as economic conditions and social networks. In this chapter, productive aging is discussed in relation to the adaptability, plasticity, and change that are inherent to the aging process, which is why this term is used instead of life course.

References

  • Anderson, L. B., & Morgan, M. (2017). Embracing the opportunities of an older workforce: Identifying the age-based strategies for coping with emotional labor. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/worker/waw039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569–664). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, S. A. (2002). Productive aging. Encyclopedia of Aging. Retrieved February 23, 2015 from http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3402200331.html

  • Bass, S. A., & Caro, F. G. (2001). Productive aging: A conceptual framework. In N. Morrow-Howell, J. E. Hinterlong, & M. W. Sherraden (Eds.), Productive aging: Concepts, and challenges. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier, M. E. (2015). The aging workforce and the demands of work in the 21st century. In L. M. Finkelstein, D. M. Truxillo, F. Fraccaroli, & R. Kanfer (Eds.), Facing the challenges of a multi-age workforce: A use-inspired approach (pp. 108–133). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengston, V. L., Elder, G. H., & Putney, N. M. (2005). The lifecourse perspective on aging: Linked lives, timing, and history. In M. L. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of age and aging (pp. 493–509). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden-Barrett, V. (2017, October 3). Older workers – not millennials – are driving the gig economy. HR Dive. Retrieved from https://www.hrdive.com/news/older-workers-not-millennials-are-driving-the-gig-economy/506349/

  • Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2012). The Oxford handbook of work and aging. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. M., Oberlink, M. R., & Schechter, M. (1990). The promise of productive aging: From biology to social policy. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. N. (1985). Productive aging: Enhancing vitality in later life. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. N. (2002). The study of productive aging. Journal of Gerontology, 57, S323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. N., & Schechter, M. (1995). Productive aging. In G. Maddox (Ed.), The encyclopedia of aging (3rd ed., pp. 824–825). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., Clark, F., & Young, R. (1998). Practical contributions of occupational science to the art of successful aging: How to sculpt a meaningful life in older adulthood. Journal of Occupational Science, 5, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, F. G., & Bass, S. A. (1995). Patterns of productive activity among older Americans. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E. J., & Spletzer, J. R. (2012). The declining average size of establishments: Evidence and explanations. Monthly Labor Review, 135(3), 50–65. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2012/03/art4full.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, J. N., & Hanscom, M. (2017). What is old at work? Moving past chronological age. In E. Parry & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of age diversity and work (pp. 17–46). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46781-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. B., & Macdonald, K. D. (2015). Productive aging: An occupational perspective. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (2015). Unfinished work: The struggle to build an aging American workforce. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J., Graveling, R., Cowie, H., & Dixon, K. (2010). The health safety and health promotion needs of older workers. Occupational Medicine, 3(60), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, K. J., & Kreiss, K. (2008). Contingent workers and contingent health: Risks of a modern economy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(4), 448–450. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.4.448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, T. R., & Sinclair, R. (2015). Application of a model for delivering occupational safety and health to smaller businesses: Case studies from the US. Safety Science, 71, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, T. R., Sinclair, R., & Schulte, P. (2014). Better understanding the small business construct to advance research on delivering workplace safety and health. Small Enterprise Research, 2(21), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2014.11082084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Guzman, A. B., Amrad, H. N., Araullo, R. C. G., & Cheung, H. B. O. (2014). A structural equation modeling of the factors affecting an age-friendly workplace. Educational Gerontology, 40(6), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.802194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Zwart, B. C. H., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & van Duivenbooden, J. C. (2002). Test-retest reliability of the work ability index questionnaire. Occupational Medicine, 52(4), 177–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deal, J. J. (2007). Retiring the generation gap: How employees young and old can find common ground. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diuguid, L. (2014). Latino family wealth projected to rise with the Hispanic population growth in U.S. Kansas City Star. Retrieved October 21, 2014 from http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/lewis-diuguid/article2357663.html

  • Estes, C. L. (1999). Critical gerontology and the new political economy of aging. In M. Minkler & C. L. Estes (Eds.), Critical gerontology: Perspectives from political and moral economy (pp. 17–35). Amityville, NY: Baywood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, C. L., & Mahakian, J. L. (2001). The political economy of productive aging. In N. Morow-Howell, J. Hinterlong, & M. Sherraden (Eds.), Productive aging: Concepts and challenges (pp. 197–213). Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrizio, M., & Franco, P. (2017). Unhealthy retirement? Journal of Human Resources, 52(1), 128–151. University of Wisconsin Press. Retrieved July 14, 2017, from Project MUSE database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. G., Ryan, L. H., & Sonnega, A. (2015). Prolonged working years: Consequences and directions of interventions. In J. Vuori, R. Blonk, & R. H. Price (Eds.), Sustainable working lives. Dodrecht, Netherland: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. G., Stachowski, A., Infurna, F. J., Faul, J. D., Grosch, J., & Tetrick, L. E. (2014). Mental work demands, retirement, and longitudinal trajectories of cognitive functioning. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035724

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, R. (2016, April 25). Millenials overake baby Boomers as America’s largest generation. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/25/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers/

  • Giancola, F. (2006). The generation gap: More myth than reality. Human Resource Planning, 29(4), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosch, J. W., & Pransky, G. S. (2010). Safety and health issues for an aging workforce. In Aging and work: Issues and implications in a changing landscape. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Truxillo, D. M., Bodner, T., Rineer, J., Pytlovany, A. C., & Richman, A. (2015). Effects of a workplace intervention targeting psychological risk factors on safety and health outcomes. BioMed Research International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/836967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, G. (2013, April). Mixing and managing four generations of employees. Farleigh Dickinson University (FDU) Magazine Online. Retrieved August 12, 2016 from http://www.fdu.edu/newspubs/magazine/05ws/generations.htm. Published 2005.

  • Harris, B. (2017, November 27). Older workers are an untapped solution to the ageing population. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/this-is-why-the-job-market-is-booming-for-older-workers/

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 205–224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • He, W., Goodkind, D., & Kowal, P. (2016). U.S. Census Bureau, International Population Reports, P95/16–1, An Aging World: 2015, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, A. R., Kahn, R. L., Morgan, J. N., Jackson, J. S., & Antonucci, T. C. (1989). Age difference in productive activities. Journal of Gerontology, 44(4), S129–S138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterlong, J. E. (2008). Productive engagement among older Americans: Prevalence, patterns, and implications for public policy. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 20(2), 141–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hipple, S. F., & Hammond, L. A. (2016). Self-employment in the United States. Spotlight on statistics. Bureau of labor statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2016/self-employment-in-the-united-states/home.htm

  • Horovitz, B. (2012, May 4). After Gen X, Millennials, what should next generation be? USA Today. Retrieved October 13, 2017 from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/advertising/story/2012-05-03/naming-the-next-generation/54737518/1

  • Howard, J. (2017). Nonstandard work arrangements and worker health and safety. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 60, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, NY: Williams Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, J. (1999). Aging workers in the European Union: Status and promotion of work ability, employability and employment (274 pages). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health and Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, J., Gould, R., Järvikoski, A., & Järvisalo, J. (2008). Diversity of work ability. In R. Gould, J. Ilmarinen, J. Järvisalo, & S. Koskinen (Eds.), Dimensions of work ability: Results of the health 2000 survey (pp. 13–24). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, J., & Tuomi, K. (2004). Past, present, and future of work ability. People and work research reports 65 (pp. 1–25). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, J., Tuomi, K., Eskelinen, L., Nygård, C. H., Huuhtanen, P., & Klockars, M. (1991a). Background and objectives of the Finnish research project on aging workers in municipal occupations. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 17(Suppl. 1), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, J., Tuomi, K., Eskelinen, L., Nygård, C. H., Huuhtanen, P., & Klockars, M. (1991b). Summary and recommendations of a project involving cross-sectional and follow-up studies on the aging worker in Finnish municipal occupations (1981–1985). Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 17(Suppl. 1), 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jex, S., Wang, M., & Zarubin, A. (2007). Aging and occupational health. In K. S. Schultz & G. A. Adams (Eds.), Aging and work in the 21st century (pp. 199–223). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, D. O., & Weissman, D. N. (2015). Occupational health and safety risks for the aging worker. In A. M. Fan, G. Alexeeff, & E. Khan (Eds.), Toxicology and risk assessment. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. J., & Mutchler, J. E. (2014). The emergence of a positive gerontology: From disengagement to social involvement. Gerontologist, 54(1), 93–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. W., & Steuerle, C. E. (2003, December 31). Promoting work at older ages: The role of hybrid pension plans in an aging population (Urban Institute Pension Research Council Working Paper PRC WP 2003-26). Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/410932-Promoting-Work-at-Older-Ages.PDF

  • Joyner, T. (2000). Gen X-ers focus on life outside the job fulfillment. The Secured Lender May/Jun. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5352/is_200005/ai_n1455443.

  • Jurkiewicz, C. E., & Brown, R. G. (1998). GenXers vs. boomers vs. matures: Generational comparisons of public employee motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18, 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 440–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R., Beier, M., & Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Goals and motivation related to work in later adulthood: An organizing framework. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. (2014, September 25). Managing people from 5 generations. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2014/09/managing-people-from-5-generations

  • Kooij, D., Van Woerkom, M., Wilkenloh, J., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2017). Job crafting toward strengths and interests: The effects of a job crafting intervention on person-job fit and the role of age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 971–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, F., & Boehm, S. A. (2015). Age diversity and global teamwork: A future agenda for researchers and practitioners. In L. M. Finkelstein, D. M. Truxillo, F. Fraccaroli, & R. Kanfer (Eds.), Facing the challenges of a multi-age workforce: A use-inspired approach (pp. 27–49). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, N., Elliott, S., & Johnson, K. (2012). Occupational therapy practice guidelines for productive aging for community-dwelling older adults. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoppke, R. R., Schill, A. L., Chosewood, L. C., Grosch, J. W., Allweiss, P., Burton, W. N., … Larson, P. W. (2013). Advancing workplace health protection and promotion for an aging workforce. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55, 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31829613a4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maertens, J. A., Putter, S. E., Chen, P. Y., Diehl, M., & Huang, Y.-H. (2012). Physical capabilities and occupational health of older workers. In J. W. Hedge & W. C. Borman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 215–235). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonagle, A. K., Fisher, G. G., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Grosch, J. W. (2015). Individual and work factors related to perceived work ability and labor force outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montepare, J. M. (2009). Subjective age: Toward a guiding lifespan framework. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(1), 42–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, H. R., & Sasser, J. R. (2015). Aging: Concepts and controversies (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. N. (1986). Unpaid productive activity over the life course. In America’s aging – Productive roles in an older society (pp. 73–109). Washington, DC: National Research Council and Institute of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., Medsker, G. J., & Campion, M. A. (2008). Job and team design. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (3rd ed., pp. 428–457). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine. (2004). Health and safety needs of older workers. Committee on the Health and Safety Needs of Older Workers. In D. H. Wegman & J. P. McGee (Eds.), Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63, 677–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (2015a, September 11). Productive aging and work: Current research. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/productiveaging/currentresearch.html

  • NIOSH (2015b, September 11). Productive aging and work: Research goals. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/productiveaging/researchgoals.html

  • NIOSH (2015c, September 11). Productive aging and work: Safety and health outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/productiveaging/safetyandhealth.html

  • NIOSH (2015d, September 15). Productive aging and work: Organizations that recognize the priorities of both workers and organizations. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/productiveaging/outcomes.html

  • NIOSH (2016a, February 3). Total Worker Health: Simple steps to get started. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/twh/steps.html

  • NIOSH (2016b, March). Older drivers in the workplace: How employers and workers can prevent crashes. Publication No. 2016-116. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-116/pdfs/2016-116.pdf

  • NIOSH (2016c, August 16). What is Total Worker Health®? Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/NIOSH/twh/

  • NIOSH, ASSE. (2015). Overlapping vulnerabilities: The occupational safety and health of young workers in small construction firms. By MA. Flynn, T. R. Cunningham, R. J. Guerin, B. Keller, L. J. Chapman, D. Hudson, C. Salgado, & OH. Cincinnati. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2015-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A., Lentz, T. J., Schulte, P., & Stayner, L. (2001). Identifying high-risk small business industries for occupational safety and health interventions. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 39(3), 301–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, P., & Caro, F. G. (1994). Productive aging: An overview of the literature. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 3(6), 39–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, K. (2009). Blood on the coal: The effect of organizational size and differentiation on coal mine accidents. Journal of Safety Research, 40(2), 85–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. C. (2000). The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In D. C. Park & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzuto, T. E., Cherry, K. E., & LeDoux, J. A. (2012). The aging process and cognitive capabilities. In W. C. Borman & J. W. Hedge (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 236–255). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195385052.013.0092

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J., & Kahn, R. (1998). Successful aging. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schill, A. L., & Chosewood, L. C. (2013). The NIOSH total worker health™ program: An overview. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(12 Supplement), S8-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, J. C., Van Bogaert, D., Forrester, C. L., & Cunningham, T. R. (in press). Risk communication in occupational safety and health: Reaching diverse audiences in an evolving communication environment. In H. D. O’Hair (Ed.), Risk and health communication in an evolving media environment. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, P. A., Grosch, J., Scholl, J. C., & Tamers, S. L. (2017). Framework for considering productive aging at work. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, P. A., Pana-Cryan, R., Schnorr, T., Schill, A. L., Guerin, R., Felknor, S., & Wagner, G. R. (2017). An approach to assess the burden of work-related injury, disease, and distress. American Journal of Public Health, 107(7), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303765

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwall, A. R. (2012). Defining age and using age-relevant constructs. In J. W. Hedge & W. C. Borman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 169–186). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, C. K., & Rider, E. A. (2015). Life-span human development (8th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. (2008). Meeting the challenges of an aging workforce. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 51, 269–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, R. C., Cunningham, T. R., & Schulte, P. A. (2013). A model for occupational safety and health intervention diffusion to small business. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 56, 1442–1451. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22263

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, S. E., Graham, I. D., & Mazmanian, P. E. (2006). Knowledge translation: Resolving the confusion. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toossi, M. (2012). Employment outlook: 2010–2020. Labor force projections to 2020: A more slowly growing workforce. Monthly Labor Review, 135(1):43–64. Retrieved November 3, 2014 from http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2012/01/art3full.pdf

  • Toossi, M. (2015, December). Labor force projections to 2024: The labor force is growing, but slowly. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topf, M. D. (2000). General next? Occupational Hazards, 62, 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towers Perrin (2006, March). Study highlights business case for attracting and retaining workers age 50+. Monitor (pp. 1–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Truxillo, D. M., Cadiz, D. M., Rineer, J. R., Zaniboni, S., & Fraccaroli, F. (2012). A lifespan perspective on job design: Fitting the job and the worker to promote job satisfaction, engagement, and performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386612454043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toossi, M., & Torpey, E. (2017). “Older workers: Labor force trends and career options,” Career Outlook, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved Nov. 23, 2018: https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2017/article/older-workers.htm.

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008, July). Older workers: Are there more older people in the workplace? Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2008/older_workers/

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2015). World population ageing 2015 (ST/ESA/SER.A/390). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf

  • United Nations Population Fund, HelpAge International. (2012). Aging in the twenty-first century: A celebration and a challenge. Retrieved from https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Ageing%20report.pdf

  • University of Washington. (2009). Designing the age-friendly workplace. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Retrieved from http://www.agefriendlyworkplace.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. P., & Giunta, N. (2009). Promoting productive aging. Health and Social Work, 34(3), 237–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. G., Dejoy, D. M., Vanderbeg, R. J., et al. (2004). Work characteristics and employee health and well-being: Test of a model of a healthy work organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 565–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliann C. Scholl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scholl, J.C., Ortiz, B., Grosch, J.W., Kaur, H. (2018). Advancing Age-Friendly Workplaces Through the NIOSH National Center for Productive Aging and Work. In: Gatchel, R., Schultz, I., Ray, C. (eds) Handbook of Rehabilitation in Older Adults. Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03916-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics