Skip to main content

The Delphi Research Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Maritime Container Port Security
  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

The Delphi technique is clearly a suitable methodology for primary data collection in the analysis of the impacts of the CSI on EU container seaport competition. Various sources have claimed that the US maritime security initiatives have either positive or negative effects on EU container port competitiveness. Based on that, the conceptual model and related assumptions were developed to achieve the research aim and objectives. The conceptual model structured five assumptions that derived a list of statements, which in turn were used to formulate Delphi round one. This chapter presents the process used to analyse the results from the Delphi survey. It starts with the presentation of the pilot study and then outlines the process of each round of Delphi. The results of the three rounds are presented, including the response rate, the consensus level and formulation of next round statement if one does not reach consensus. For statements that reach consensus level, comments and discussions will be presented in Chapter 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel-Fattah, N. (1997). Privatisation of the Road Freight Industry in Egypt and Hungary (PhD thesis). University of Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing Social Research (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, H. (2012). An Analysis of Eastern European Liner Shipping During the Period of Transition (PhD thesis). University of Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, H., Roe, M., & Challacombe, J. (2004). Outsourcing of trucking activities by relief organisations. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance, 1(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goluchowicz, K., & Blind, K. (2011). Identification of future fields of standardisation: An explorative application of the Delphi methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1526–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, C. M. (1987). The Delphi technique: A critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12, 729–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grix, J. (2004). The Foundations of Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat, J., Mellis, C., Williams, K., & Xuan, W. (2002). Health Science Research: A Handbook of Quantitative Methods. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von der Gracht, H. A. (2008). The Future of Logistics: Scenarios for 2025. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xufan Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, X., Roe, M. (2019). The Delphi Research Process. In: Maritime Container Port Security. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03825-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics