Skip to main content

Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Stoppard’s Guildenstern: Leap Between Un-Existentialist Anguish and Un-Absurdist Happiness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hamlet and Emotions

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

Abstract

Despite Tom Stoppard’s insistence that he did not know the term ‘existential’ when penning Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, critics have long branded his famous play a work of existentialist theatre. Unlike the bulk of existentialist literature and philosophy, however, Stoppard’s play does not deal with the anxiety that arises when one recognizes her absolute freedom to act in a meaningless and random world. Instead, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead explores the horror that arises from an opposite epiphany: that perhaps we are completely devoid of freedom, leading entirely pre-scripted lives in a drama of someone else’s composition. This chapter argues that both Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Hamlet can productively enrich the existentialist tradition by diagnosing a species of anxiety patently different from those theorized by existentialist philosophers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Beauvoir, Simone de. The Ethics of Ambiguity. Translated by Bernard Frechtman. New York: Philosophical Library, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boethius. The Consolation of Philosophy. Translated by Richard H. Green. Mineola: Dover, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, Albert. ‘The Myth of Sisyphus’. In The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. Translated by Justin O’Brien, 1–138. New York: Vintage International, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, Albert. Notebooks, 1951–1959. Translated by Ryan Bloom. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, Charles K. ‘“As in a Theatre”: Hamlet in the Light of Calvin’s Doctrine of Predestination’. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 11, no. 2 (Spring 1971): 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotkin, George. Existential America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, Oliver George. ‘To Be, Or Not to Be in Bad Faith: The Tragedy of Hamlet’s Superficial Reading of Sartre’s Waiter’. Philosophy and Literature 38 (2014): 254–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Joseph E. ‘Godot Comes: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead’. Ariel 12, no. 4 (1981): 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurnow, Michael. ‘“No Symbol Where None Intended”: A Study of Symbolism and Allusion in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot’. Apmonia (2001). https://archive.is/cwgws.

  • Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: HarperCollins, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, Karl. Tragedy Is Not Enough. Translated by Harald A. T. Reiche, Harry T. Moore, and Karl W. Deutsch. Boston: Archon Books, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Walter. ‘Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre’. In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, edited by Walter Kaufmann, 1–51. New York: Plume, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Walter. The Owl and the Nightingale: From Shakespeare to Existentialism. London: Faber and Faber, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, Richard. ‘Kierkegaard on Hamlet: Between Art and Religion’. In The New Kierkegaard, edited by Elsebet Jegstrup, 224–243. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, Charlotte. ‘Shakespeare’s Existentialism’. PhD dissertation, Royal Holloway, University of London, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. Journals and Papers. Vol. 2. Edited and Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. The Concept of Anxiety: A Simple Psychologically Orienting Deliberation on the Dogmatic Issue of Hereditary Sin. Edited and Translated by Reidar Thomte and Albert B. Anderson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. ‘Fear and Trembling’. In Fear and Trembling/Repetition, edited and translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong, 1–123. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. Stages on Life’s Way. Edited and Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, Paul S. ‘Eternal Recurrence’. In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, edited by Ken Gemes and John Richardson, 645–671. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdipour, Alireza. ‘The Existential Idea of Self in Shakespeare’s Hamlet: A Justification for the Renaissance Convention of Play-Within-the-Play’. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities 49, no. 200 (Spring 2008): 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. Existentialism and Humanism. Translated by Philip Mairet. London: Methuen, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. ‘The Dirty Hands’. In No Exit and Three Other Plays, translated by Lionel Abel. New York: Vintage Books, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Philosophical Library, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. Witness to My Life: The Letters of Jean-Paul Sartre to Simone de Beauvoir, 1926–1939. Edited by Simone de Beauvoir. Translated by Lee Fahnestock and Norman MacAfee. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. Saint Genet: Actor and Martyr. Translated by Bernard Frechtman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623. The Arden Shakespeare. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. London: Bloomsbury, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. The Arden Shakespeare. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. Revised ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. London: Faber and Faber, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom Stoppard in Conversation. Edited by Paul Delaney. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Sandra, and Thomas Williams. Anselm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, Walt. Song of Myself, and Other Poems. Berkeley: Counterpoint, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Zhihua. ‘“I Have Lost Me”: Zhuangzi’s Butterfly Dream’. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40, no. 3/4 (2013): 511–526.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Megna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Megna, P. (2019). Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Stoppard’s Guildenstern: Leap Between Un-Existentialist Anguish and Un-Absurdist Happiness. In: Megna, P., Phillips, B., White, R.S. (eds) Hamlet and Emotions. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03795-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics