Abstract
A major paradigm shift from standardization to the customization era has posed a whole range of challenges in terms of relevance of higher-education (HE) in general and that of quality assurance, in particular. With everlasting changes, the role of quality assurance (QA) in HE is rapidly expanding to move from its initial purpose of ensuring credibility and trust to also ensure relevance of HE provisions and, most recently, the issues of recognition of the HE outcomes and outputs. On top of considering the diversity of needs resulting from globalization and the ICT revolution, to be a success, the needs of a specific system should be considered at a diversity of levels, including but not limited to subject-specific, institutional, system-wide, national and regional levels to name but a few. To ensure the HE systems are relevant and cover the diversity of provisions in the increasingly customized environment, multiple and diverse measurement tools need to link and lead to the solution of a range of system needs.
The article takes a stock of the last decades of developments in the HE and QA provisions in the Arab region through a critical reflection on the relevance of those provisions to the diverse socio-economic needs. It also endeavors to critically analyze the existing QA systems in the Arab region in terms of international comparability and national suitability. Overall, the HE system in the region is characterized as booming in terms of diversification, including transnational provisions as the major trend. On the other hand, the QA systems seem to be successfully completing their establishment phase and are currently in a transition to revise and introduce a more customized system to coherently link the QA mechanisms with the set priorities at a diversity of levels. One of the major findings in terms of relevance is the further need to link the national qualifications frameworks in the region with respective QA tools to promote relevance and ultimate recognition of the qualifications offered nationally, regionally, and internationally. To promote relevance and recognition, a need to move from input- and process-based mechanisms to more outcome-based approaches seems to be tangible. Recognition of external QA systems against robust international criteria needs to lead the priority list on the agenda of governments if outcomes of the QA are to lead to international recognition of the HE systems and awarded qualifications, in particular.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
UNESCO Global Convention on the Recognition of Higher Education Qualifications Project (to be published in 2019), https://en.unesco.org/themes/higher-education/recognition-qualifications/global-convention
- 2.
- 3.
The Global Study was initiated by the INQAAHE in 2017 to look at the overall developments and relevance of the QA mechanisms worldwide and the study is in the process of finalization and publication. The Scoping Study in the Arab Region was made in close cooperation with the ANQAHE.
- 4.
- 5.
References
Sarvi, J., & Pillay, H. (2015). Innovations in knowledge and learning for competitive higher education in Asia and the Pacific region. Manila: Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/177737/innovations-knowledge-learning.pdf
British Council. (2017). 10 trends – transformative changes in higher education. British Council/Education Intelligence. https://ei.britishcouncil.org/educationintelligence/10-trends-transformative-changes-higher-education
Carey, K. (2015). The end of college: Creating the future of learing and the university of everywhere. New York: Penguin.
Katsigiannis, T. M. -W. (2014). Shaping the future through co-creation. Institute of Public Administration Australia. http://www.ipaa.org.au/documents/2014/05/innovation-report.pdf/
QS Best Student Cities. https://www.topuniversities.com/city-rankings/2018
Pevec, S. (2017). Global inventory of regional and national qualifications frameworks 2017: Volume 1: Thematic chapters. Cedefop, UNESCO, ETF, UIL https://unevoc.unesco.org/up/NQF_Global_Inventory_volume_I.pdf
European Qualifications Framework. https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/en/content/descriptors-page
INQAAHE. (2003, 2016 revision). INQAAHE guidelines of good practice. INQAAHE. http://www.inqaahe.org/sites/default/files/INQAAHE_GGP2016.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karakhanyan, S. (2019). Quality Assurance in the Arab Region in the Era of Customization: Where Do We Stand in Terms of Relevance?. In: Badran, A., Baydoun, E., Hillman, J.R. (eds) Major Challenges Facing Higher Education in the Arab World: Quality Assurance and Relevance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03774-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03774-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03773-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03774-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)