Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Temporary Camps, Enduring Segregation pp 1–40Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

Abstract

The introduction opens with the stories of three camp dwellers and presents the research question, which is: Why do different camps persist in different ways? It then clarifies the focus of the research: institutional camps, i.e. created and run by state agencies. Despite often emerging as temporary solutions in situations of emergency, these camps, however, often persist. I thus unpack the concept of ‘persistent temporariness’, which I argue has been under-theorised. The book aims to fill this gap in the literature by construing persistence through theories on ‘incremental institutional change’ and by looking at different regimes of enduring temporariness in order to understand the factors that determine it. To do so, I combine theoretical approaches in camp and ghetto studies and advance a conceptualisation of the camp as a space of ‘contentious politics’. This underscores the plurality of state and non-state actors governing it and their ever-evolving frames, resources, opportunities and repertoires of action. Finally, the introduction presents the comparative method employed, which I call ‘asymmetrical comparison’, i.e. a combination of the in-depth analysis of one case (i.e. the Italian Roma camps) and a small-n comparison (with the French integration villages and past transit estates).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agier, Michel. 2011a. “From Refuge the Ghetto Is Born: Contemporary Figures of Heterotopias.” In The Ghetto: Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies, edited by Ray Hutchison and Bruce D. Haynes, 265–92. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Managing the Undesirables: Refugee Camps and Humanitarian Government. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, Louise. 2013. The Politics of Possibility: Risk and Security Beyond Probability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldi, Andrea, and Carlo Stasolla. 2010. Esclusi e Ammassati. Rapporto di ricerca sulla condizione dei minori rom nel villaggio attrezzato di via di Salone a Roma. Roma: Associazione 21 Luglio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbaci, Sonia. 2012. Paradoxes of Segregation: Urban Migration in Europe: Studies in Urban and Social Change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Associazione 21 Luglio. 2014. “Senza Luce. Le politiche della Giunta Marino, le comunità rom e sinte nella città di Roma e il ‘Best House Rom’.” http://www.21luglio.org/senza-luce-rapporto-sulle-politiche-della-giunta-marino-le-comunita-rom-sinte-nella-citta-roma-il-best-house-rom-marzo-2014/.

  • Bancroft, Angus. 2001. “Closed Spaces, Restricted Places: Marginalisation of Roma in Europe.” Space and Polity 5 (2): 145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Stephen. 2002. “Institutionalism: Old and New.” In Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia, edited by John Summers. Sydney, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermann, Karen, and Isabella Clough Marinaro. 2014. “‘We Work It Out’: Roma Settlements in Rome and the Limits of Do-It-Yourself.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 7 (4): 399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardot, Marc. 2005. “Déplacer et loger les indésirables, sociologie du logement contraint.” Recueil Alexandries, Collections Esquisses, septembre. http://www.reseau-terra.eu/article337.html.

  • Brown, Gavin, Anna Feigenbaum, Fabian Frenzel, and Patrick McCurdy, eds. 2017. Protest Camps in International Context: Spaces, Infrastructures and Media of Resistance. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2010. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun, Cathrine, and Anita Fábos. 2015. “Making Homes in Limbo? A Conceptual Framework.” Refuge 31 (1): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough Marinaro, Isabella. 2017. “The Informal Faces of the (Neo-)Ghetto: State Confinement, Formalization and Multidimensional Informalities in Italy’s Roma Camps.” International Sociology 32 (4): 545–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, Allan. 1994. “Restructuring the Local Welfare State.” In Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?, edited by Roger Burrows and Brian D. Loader, 117–35. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Muriel. 2013. Des familles invisibles. Politiques publiques et trajectoires résidentielles de l’immigration algérienne (1945–1985). Paris: Université de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” Political Sciences and Politics 44 (4): 823–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, Deirdre. 2011. “Waiting: Feminist Perspectives on the Spacings/Timings of Migrant (Im)Mobility.” Gender, Place and Culture 18 (3): 353–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czajka, Agnes. 2012. “The Potential of Sanctuary: Acts of Sanctuary Through the Lens of the Camp.” In Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives, edited by Randy Lippert and Sean Rehaag, 43–56. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lovinfosse, Isabelle. 2008. How and Why Do Policies Change? A Comparison of Renewable Electricity Policies in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK. Brussels: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikeç, Mustafa, and Eric Swyngedouw. 2017. “Theorizing the Politicizing City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diken, Bülent. 2004. “From Refugee Camps to Gated Communities: Biopolitics and the End of the City.” Citizenship Studies 8 (1): 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diken, Bülent, and Carsten Bagge Laustsen. 2005. The Culture of Exception: Sociology Facing the Camp. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, St. Clair, and Horace R. Cayton. 1945. Black Metropolis: Study of Negro Life in a Northern City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Bob, and John D. McCarthy. 2004. “Resources and Social Movement Mobilization.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 116–52. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1996. “Welfare States Without Work: The Impasse of Labour Shedding and Familialism in Continental European Social Policy.” In Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations, edited by Gøsta Esping-Andersen, 66–87. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Roma Rights Center. 2000. “Campland: Racial Segregation of Roma in Italy.” Country Report Series No. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, Adalbert, and Jean-Louis Laville, eds. 2004. The Third Sector in Europe. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falletti, Tulia G., and Julia Lynch. 2009. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (9): 1143–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Eric. 2010. “Pourquoi les Roms?” Mediapart (blog), septembre 12. http://blogs.mediapart.fr/blog/eric-fassin/120910/pourquoi-les-roms.

  • Fekete, Liz. 2014. “Europe Against the Roma.” Race & Class: A Journal on Racism, Empire and Globalization 55 (3): 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontanari, Elena. 2015. “Confined to the Threshold: The Experiences of Asylum Seekers in Germany.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 19 (5): 714–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–102. Toronto: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fregonese, Sara. 2012. “Beyond the ‘Weak State’: Hybrid Sovereignties in Beirut.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (4): 655–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyall, Rachel. 2017. “Nonprofits as Advocates and Providers: A Conceptual Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 45 (1): 121–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis 2: 131–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack A. 1997. “Methodological Issues in Comparative Macrosociology.” Comparative Social Research 16: 107–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Derek. 2006. “The Black Flag: Guantánamo Bay and the Space of Exception.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88 (4): 405–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grill, Jan. 2012. “‘Going Up to England’: Exploring Mobilities Among Roma from Eastern Slovakia.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (8): 1269–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailey, Charlie. 2009. Camps: A Guide to 21st-Century Space. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 373–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter, and David Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter, and Rosemary Taylor. 2001. “Political Science and the Three Institutionalisms.” In Institutions and Social Order, edited by Karol Soltan, Virginia Haufler, and Eric M. Uslaner, 15–44. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafi, Sari, and Taylor Long. 2010. “Governance, Governmentalities, and the State of Exception in the Palestinian Refugee Camps of Lebanon.” Journal of Refugee Studies 23 (2): 134–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, Chris, and Manuel Lutz. 2015. “The Roots and Implications of the USA’s Homeless Tent Cities.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 19 (5): 689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Ray, and Bruce D. Haynes, eds. 2011. The Ghetto: Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, Jennifer. 2000. Managing Displacement: Refugees and the Politics of Humanitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E. M. 1998. “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism.” Politics & Society 26 (1): 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, Engin, and Kim Rygiel. 2007. “Abject Spaces: Frontiers, Zones, Camps.” In The Logics of Biopower and the War on Terror: Living, Dying, Surviving, edited by Elizabeth Dauphinee and Christina Masters, 181–203. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, James M. 1998. “The Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions in and Around Social Movements.” Sociological Forum 13 (3): 397–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Irit. 2015. “From Spaces of Thanatopolitics to Spaces of Natality—A Commentary on ‘Geographies of the Camp’.” Political Geography 49: 84–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazepov, Yuri. 2008. “The Subsidiarization of Social Policies: Actors, Processes and Impacts: Some Reflections on the Italian Case from a European Perspective.” European Societies 10 (2): 247–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lallement, Michel, and Jean-Louis Laville. 2000. “Introduction. Tiers secteur.” Sociologie du travail 42: 523–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Todd. 2003. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lippert, Randy. 1999. “Governing Refugees: The Relevance of Governmentality to Understanding the International Refugee Regime.” Alternatives 24: 295–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestri, Gaja. 2016. “From Nomads to Squatters: Towards a Deterritorialisation of Roma Exceptionalism Through Assemblage Thinking.” In Re-thinking Life at the Margins: Assemblage, Subjects and Spaces, edited by Michele Lancione, 122–35. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. “The Contentious Sovereignties of the Camp: Political Contention Among State and Non-state Actors in Italian Roma Camps.” Political Geography 60: 213–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestri, Gaja, and Tommaso Vitale. 2017. “A Sociology of the Camps’ Persisting Architecture: Why Did ROME Not Put an End to Expensive Ethnic Housing Policies?” In Architecture and the Social Sciences. Inter- and Multidisciplinary Approaches Between Society and Space, edited by Manuela Mendes, Teresa Sà, and João Cabral, 197–218. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James, and Gary Goertz. 2004. “The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 653–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Peter. 2011. “De-spatialization and De-ghettoization: The Future of the U.S. Ghetto.” In The Ghetto: Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies, edited by Ray Hutchison and Bruce D. Haynes, 33–66. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Diana. 2015. “From Spaces of Exception to ‘Campscapes’: Palestinian Refugee Camps and Informal Settlements in Beirut.” Political Geography 44: 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy Denton. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Zald N., and John D. McCarthy. 1977. “Resource Mobilisation and Social Movements.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Dough, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, Colin. 2010. “The Comparative City: Knowledge, Learning, Urbanism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (4): 725–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David S., Valerie Jenness, and Helen Ingram, eds. 2005. Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minca, Claudio. 2015a. “Counter-Camps and Other Spatialities.” Political Geography 49: 90–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. “Geographies of the Camp.” Political Geography 49: 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Dominique, NIck Gill, and Deirdre Conlon, eds. 2013. Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention. Avebury: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, Carl H. 2012. Segregation: A Global History of Divided Cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patané, Simonetta. 2003. “The Third Sector in Italy.” EuroSET Report. Rome: European Social Enterprise Training, Centro Italiano di Solidarietà di Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. Guy, Jon Pierre, and Desmond S. King. 2005. “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.” The Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picker, Giovanni, and Gabriele Roccheggiani. 2013. “Abnormalising Minorities: The State and Expert Knowledge Addressing the Roma in Italy.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 21 (2): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picker, Giovanni, and Silvia Pasquetti. 2015. “Durable Camps: The State, the Urban, the Everyday.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 19 (5): 681–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picker, Giovanni, Margaret Greenfields, and David Smith. 2015. “Colonial Refractions: The ‘Gypsy Camp’ as a Spatio-Racial Political Technology.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 19 (5): 741–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” The American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan, Adam. 2010. “In the Ruins of Nahr Al-Barid: Understanding the Meaning of the Camp.” Journal of Palestine Studies 40 (1): 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. “Spatialising the Refugee Camp.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (1): 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan, Adam, and Sara Fregonese. 2017. “Hybrid Sovereignty and the State of Exception in the Palestinian Refugee Camps in Lebanon.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 107 (4): 949–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, Victoria. 2013. Statelessness and Citizenship: Camps and the Creation of Political Space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Jennifer. 2006. Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rygiel, Kim. 2011. “Bordering Solidarities: Migrant Activism and the Politics of Movement and Camps at Calais.” Citizenship Studies 15 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, Liza. 2011. “Dublin II and Eurodac: Examining the (Un)Intended(?) Consequences.” Gender, Place and Culture 18 (3): 401–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigona, Nando. 2015. “Campzenship: Reimagining the Camp as a Social and Political Space.” Citizenship Studies 19 (1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigona, Nando, and Nidhi Trehan, eds. 2009. Romani Politics in Contemporary Europe: Poverty, Ethnic Mobilization, and the Neoliberal Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back in, edited by P. Evans, Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sordé Martì, Teresa, Ariadna Munté, Ana Contreras, and Oscar Prieto-Flores. 2012. “Immigrant and Native Romani Women in Spain: Building Alliances and Developing Shared Strategies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (8): 1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1986. The contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremlett, Annabel. 2009. “Bringing Hybridity to Heterogeneity in Romani Studies.” Romani Studies 19 (2): 147–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Simon. 2005. “Suspended Spaces: Contesting Sovereignties in a Refugee Camp.” In Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the postcolonial world, edited by Thomas B. Hansen and Finn Stepputat, 312–32. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Simon. 2015. “What Is a Refugee Camp? Explorations of the Limits and Effects of the Camp.” Journal of Refugee Studies 29 (2): 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viterna, Jocelyn, Emily Clough, and Killian Clarke. 2015. “Reclaiming the ‘Third Sector’ from ‘Civil Society’: A New Agenda for Development Studies.” Sociology of Development 1 (1): 173–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loïc. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. “A Janus-Faced Institution of Ethnoracial Closure: A Sociological Specification of the Ghetto.” In The Ghetto: Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies, edited by Ray Hutchison and Bruce D. Haynes, 1–31. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, William. 2015. “Reflections on Migration and Governmentality.” Journal Für Kritische Migrations Und Grenzregimeforschung 1 (1): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, Robert Clifton. 1948. The Negro Ghetto. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, Patrick. 2005. La France et ses étrangers. L’aventure d’une politique de l’immigration de 1938 à nos jours. Folio Histoire. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, Wim. 1998. “Ethnicity as a Death-Trap: The History of Gypsy Studies.” In Gypsies and Other Itinerant Groups, edited by Leo Lucassen, Wim Willems, and Annemarie Cottaar. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Louis. 1928. The Ghetto, 10e ed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel, Oren. 2009. “Critical Theory and ‘Gray Space’: Mobilization of the Colonized.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 13 (2–3): 246–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Media, Communication and Sociology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    Gaja Maestri

Authors
  1. Gaja Maestri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaja Maestri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maestri, G. (2019). Introduction. In: Temporary Camps, Enduring Segregation . Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03736-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03736-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03735-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03736-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation