Skip to main content

Free Market in a Small Republic—Economic Doctrines of Jeffersonians and Jacksonians

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The American Counter-Revolution in Favor of Liberty
  • 174 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Jeffersonian and Jacksonian traditions in economic theory were reviewed. We found the basic continuity with the essential libertarian motiffs of the revolutionary thought (free trade, low taxes) but with an increasing level of theoretical sophistication: drawing inspiration from Adam Smith and French liberals, Jefferson, John Taylor and their followers, as well as Jacksonian economists like Leggett, Ragouet, or Gouge forged a powerful theoretical models explaining monetary and banking theory, free trade, nexus between the government and the economy, in a libertarian manner, anticipating some of the motives and arguments of the free market economic thought of the twentieth century. Also, we find further evidence of a deep affinity between political decentralization and economic liberty. These findings cast a strong doubt on the conventional treatments of Jeffersonian and Jacksonian economics as being variously “agrarian” or egalitarian or proto-socialist. It is shown that this is incorrect and that the main reason for these misguided interpretations is a conceptual confusion about what capitalism means—historians very often treat mercantilist and protectionist policies as synonymous with “commercial liberalism” because it is enacted for the benefit of some business interests, and free market thought as agrarian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The literature on this is virtually boundless, but Charles Beard and various Beardean followers or iconoclasts are at the forefront, see Beard (1986), McDonald (1976), Maine (1961), Pocock (1975), Banning (1986), Jensen (1968).

  2. 2.

    In his “Report on the National Bank” Hamilton writes: “[paper money causes] augmentation of the active or productive capital of a country, gold and silver, when they are employed merely as the instruments of exchange and alienation, have not been improperly denominated as dead stock; but when deposited in banks to become a basis of a paper circulation, which takes their character and place…they then acquire life, or, in other words, an active and productive quality” (Hamilton 1957: 54–55).

  3. 3.

    “Cantillon effect” is often used to refer to a phenomenon that the credit expansion by private banks does not affect all prices equally, but rather disproportionately increases the prices of financial assets and producers good, whereas the agricultural and consumers’ goods are increased latest. This change in relative prices leads to a redistribution of income from people on fixed incomes toward speculators and investors in the long-term projects, see Hayek ([1933] 2009).

  4. 4.

    See Taylor (1822).

  5. 5.

    Adam Smith (1907: 457). The quoted passage referred to the trade restrictions but is equally applicable to all other aspects of economic policy.

  6. 6.

    “Letter to James Monroe, April 17, 1791” in Jefferson, Collected Works, Federal edition, Vol. VI, p. 243.

  7. 7.

    Compare this with Hamilton’s view, Footnote 2 above.

  8. 8.

    For a more developed version of this theory, written a half a century later, see Mises (1912), Fetter (1915), Hayek (1933).

  9. 9.

    This is the celebrated principle of positive rate of time preference, discovered by Bohm-Bawerk [1889] 1930 and today universally accepted in economics.

  10. 10.

    Philp Barbour was old school Jeffersonian, but he lived through the Jacksonian era and participated in that movement too, so could be classified either way.

  11. 11.

    For the classical formulation of this problem, see Hayek (1945).

  12. 12.

    This (the application of Hayekian knowledge argument to any kind of government intervention) is an argument that, to best of my knowledge, is yet to be made by modern economics. This author has a work-in-progress manuscript making similar kind of argument, but it is still unfinished and unpublished.

  13. 13.

    Compare this with Hayek (1945: 2): “The peculiar character of the problem of a rational economic order is determined precisely by the fact that the knowledge of the circumstances of which we must make use never exists in concentrated or integrated form but solely as the dispersed bits of incomplete and frequently contradictory knowledge which all the separate individuals possess. The economic problem of society is thus not merely a problem of how to allocate “given” resources—if “given” is taken to mean given to a single mind which deliberately solves the problem set by these “data.” It is rather a problem of how to secure the best use of resources known to any of the members of society, for ends whose relative importance only these individuals know. Or, to put it briefly, it is a problem of the utilization of knowledge which is not given to anyone in its totality.”

References

  • Banning, L. (1986). Jeffersonian Ideology Revisited: Liberal and Classical Ideas in the New American Republic. William and Mary Quarterly, 40, 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, P. (1824). Speech of Mr. P.P. Barbour, of Virginia, on the Tariff Bill [Electronic Resource]: Delivered in the House of Representatives, U.S., March 26, 1824. Washington, DC: Gales & Seaton (accessed via SFU library).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C. (1986). An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm-Bawerk von, E. ([1889] 1930). The Positive Theory of Capital. New York: G.E. Stechert and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinard, G. (1979). The Letters of Lafayette and Jefferson. New York: Arno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbourn, T. H. (1965). The Lamp of Experience: Whig History and the Intellectual Origins of the American Revolution. Chappell Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degler, C. (1956). The Locofocos: Urban ‘Agrarians’. The Journal of Economic History, 16(3), 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, J. H. (2006). Money, Bank Credit and the Economic Cycles (3rd ed.). Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devanny, J., Jr. (2001). ‘A Loathing of Public Debt, Taxes and Excises’: The Political Economy of John Randolph of Roanoke. The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, 109(4), 387–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, F. (1915). Economic Principles. New York: The Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouge, W. (1833). The Curse of Paper Money and Banking. London: Mills, Jovet and Mills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A. (1957). On Public Credit, Commerce and Finance. New York: Liberal Arts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammmond, B. (1957). Banks and Politics in America, from the Revolution to the Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. ([1933] 2009). Prices and Production and Other Works. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankovic, I. (2016). Men of Little Faith: The Country Party Ideology in England and America. American Political Thought, 5(2), 183–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. (1967 [1943]). Complete Jefferson (S. K. Padover, Ed.). New York: Books for Libraries Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1968). The Founding of a Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, W. (1984). Democratick Editorials: Essays in Jacksonian Democracy, Collected by Lawrence White. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, J. T. (1961). The Antifederalists; Critics of the Constitution 1781–1788. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, F. (1976). The Presidency of Thomas Jefferson. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, M. (1960). The Jacksonian Persuasion: Politics and Belief. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raguet, C. (1967 [1840]). A Treatise on Currency and Banking. New York: August M. Kelly Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, T. (1820). Speech in the Virginia Assembly 1820. Journal of the House of Delegates, December 4th 1820. Richmond, VA: Thomas Ritchie Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M. (1995). Classical Economics: An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A., Jr. (1953). The Age of Jackson. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. ([1776] 1907). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J. R. (1982). Country Ideology, Republicanism, and Libertarianism: The Thought of John Taylor of Caroline. Journal of Libertarian Studies, VI(1), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1814). An Inquiry into the Principles and Policy of the Government of the United States. Fredericksburg, VA: Green and Cady.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1820). Construction Construed and Constitutions Vindicated. Richmond: Shepherd and Pollard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1822). Tyranny Unmasked. Washington: Davis and Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, L. ([1912] 1953). The Theory of Money and Credit. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, L. ([1921] 1990). Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Jankovic .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jankovic, I. (2019). Free Market in a Small Republic—Economic Doctrines of Jeffersonians and Jacksonians. In: The American Counter-Revolution in Favor of Liberty. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03733-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics