Skip to main content

The Future for the Relationship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Role of Credit Rating Agencies in Responsible Finance

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance ((SIF))

  • 764 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the aim is to develop some potential hypotheses for how the relationship between the parties will develop. The first issue developed is that the Initiative must take great care in progressing with the relationship, and that to protect the ‘movement’, certain safeguards need to be established. One such proposed method is the re-imagining of a Dodd-Frank creation which would enable the smaller agencies to actively participate in the ‘responsible investment’ movement, whilst also creating a system of ‘checks and balances’ for on looking investors where the CRAs are concerned. The chapter concludes by airing some of the ‘concerns’ regarding the nature of the CRAs and their potential impact on the development of the ‘Responsible Investment’ movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Daniel Cash, ‘Credit Rating Agency Regulation: Has the “Rule 17g-5 Program” Worked?’ [2018] 29 International Company and Commercial Law Review 7 464–74.

  2. 2.

    The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 17 CFR 240 17g.

  3. 3.

    Securities and Exchange Commission, Report to Congress on Assigned Credit Ratings (2012) 54.

  4. 4.

    James Weston, ‘An Improved Regulatory Framework for Credit Rating Agencies?’ [2013] 2 Global Credit Review: Risk Management Institute 21.

  5. 5.

    Liangrong Zu, ‘Global Initiative for Sustainability Ratings’ in Samuel O. Idowu, Nicholas Capaldi, Matthias S. Fifka, Liangrong Zu, and René Schmidpeter (eds.), Dictionary of Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics and Governance (Springer 2015) 280.

  6. 6.

    Malcom Campbell-Verduyn, Professional Authority After the Global Financial Crisis: Defending Mammon in Anglo-America (Springer 2017) 59.

  7. 7.

    Kern Alexander, ‘The Risk of Ratings in Bank Capital Regulation’ [2014] 25 European Business Law Review 2 295–313.

  8. 8.

    Daniel Cash, ‘Sustainable Finance Ratings as the Latest Symptom of “Rating Addiction”’ [2018] 3 Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 254.

  9. 9.

    Herwig P. Langohr and Patricia T. Langhor, The Rating Agencies and Their Ratings: What They Are, How They Work, and Why They Are Relevant (Wiley 2010) 429.

  10. 10.

    Cash (n. 8) 243.

  11. 11.

    For a more detailed account of the three Basel Accords, see Michael B. Gordy, Erik A. Heitfield, and Jason J. Wu, ‘Risk-based Regulatory Capital and the Basel Accords’ in Allen N. Berger, Philip Molyneux, and John O. S. Wilson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Banking (Oxford University Press 2015).

  12. 12.

    Raquel G. Alcubilla and Javier R. del Pozo, Credit Rating Agencies on the Watch List: Analysis of European Regulation (Oxford University Press 2012) 86.

  13. 13.

    Ibid.

  14. 14.

    Luisa Izzi, Gianluca Oricchio, and Laura Vitale (eds), Basel III Credit Rating Systems: An Applied Guide to Quantitative and Qualitative Models (Palgrave Macmillan 2012).

  15. 15.

    Caroline Binham, ‘Banks Score Victory on Use of Ratings in Capital Calculations’ [2015] Financial Times (December 10).

  16. 16.

    Mohammed Hemraj, Credit Rating Agencies: Self-Regulation, Statutory Regulation and Case Law Regulation in the United States and European Union (Springer 2016) 21.

  17. 17.

    Jennifer Thompson, ‘Asset Managers Engage in ESG “War for Talent”’ [2018] Financial Times (June 16).

  18. 18.

    Lawrence J. White, ‘Markets: The Credit Rating Agencies’ [2010] 24 The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 211

  19. 19.

    Ibid.

  20. 20.

    Moody’s , Moody’s Completes Acquisition of Bureau van Dijk (2017).

Bibliography

  • Alcubilla, R. G., and del Pozo, J. R. Credit Rating Agencies on the Watch List: Analysis of European Regulation (Oxford University Press 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Binham, C. ‘Banks Score Victory on Use of Ratings in Capital Calculations’ [2015] Financial Times (December 10) https://www.ft.com/content/acb8f50a-9ea6-11e5-8ce1-f6219b685d74. Accessed 23 July 2018.

  • Campbell-Verduyn, M. Professional Authority After the Global Financial Crisis: Defending Mammon in Anglo-America (Springer 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. ‘Credit Rating Agency Regulation: Has the “Rule 17g-5 Program” Worked?’ [2018] 29 International Company and Commercial Law Review 7 464–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. ‘Sustainable Finance Ratings as the Latest Symptom of “Rating Addiction”’ [2018] 3 Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 242–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordy, M. B., Heitfield, E. A., and Wu, J. J. ‘Risk-Based Regulatory Capital and the Basel Accords’ in Berger, A. N., Molyneux, P., and Wilson, J. O. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Banking (Oxford University Press 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemraj, M. Credit Rating Agencies: Self-Regulation, Statutory Regulation and Case Law Regulation in the United States and European Union (Springer 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herwig P. Langohr and Patricia T. Langhor, The Rating Agencies and Their Ratings: What They Are, How They Work, and Why They Are Relevant (Wiley 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Izzi, L., Oricchio, G., and Vitale, L. (eds.), Basel III Credit Rating Systems: An Applied Guide to Quantitative and Qualitative Models (Palgrave Macmillan 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s, Moody’s Completes Acquisition of Bureau van Dijk (2017) http://ir.moodys.com/news-and-financials/press-releases/press-release-details/2017/Moodys-Completes-Acquisition-of-Bureau-van-Dijk/default.aspx. Accessed 25 July 2018.

  • Securities and Exchange Commission, Report to Congress on Assigned Credit Ratings (2012) https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2012/assigned-credit-ratings-study.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2018.

  • The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 17 CFR 240 17g.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. ‘Asset Managers Engage in ESG “War for Talent”’ [2018] Financial Times (June 16) https://www.ft.com/content/0695124e-6eec-11e8-852d-d8b934ff5ffa. Accessed 1 July 2018.

  • Weston, J. ‘An Improved Regulatory Framework for Credit Rating Agencies?’ [2013] 2 Global Credit Review: Risk Management Institute 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. J. ‘Markets: The Credit Rating Agencies’ [2010] 24 The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zu, L. ‘Global Initiative for Sustainability Ratings’ in Idowu, S. O., Capaldi, N., Fifka, M. S., Zu, L., and Schmidpeter, R. (eds.), Dictionary of Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics and Governance (Springer 2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Cash .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cash, D. (2018). The Future for the Relationship. In: The Role of Credit Rating Agencies in Responsible Finance. Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03709-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03709-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03708-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03709-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics