Advertisement

Toward Mass Customized Architecture. Applying Principles of Mass Customization While Designing Site-Specific, Customer-Inclusive and Bespoke Timber Structures

  • John Haddal MorkEmail author
  • Marcin Luczkowski
  • Bendik Manum
  • Anders Rønnquist
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 24)

Abstract

Mass customization is established in many industries, but are not yet integrated in architecture and the building industry. This article presents a parametric timber toolkit under development. A flexible toolkit for parametrically designed timber structures, a toolkit that simplifies and substantiates a continuous digital workflow from global shape to digital fabrication and assembly—a toolkit that requires parametric thinking, not only parametric modelling skills. The toolkit proposes solutions to four recurrent workflow-related challenges that limit efficiency and quality while designing timber structures. A series of built case projects are used to exemplify and explain the toolkit. An important finding discussed in the end of the article is that parametric modelling, and partly the toolkit, changes our conception of what is considered a similar structure.

Keywords

Parametric design and fabrication strategies CNC and woodworking technology Parametric timber engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by Innovation Norway. We thank our collaborators from Nikken Sekkei Digital Design Lab who provided insights and expertise of developing the toolkit’s concept and technical solutions. Further, we thank Moelven Limtre who provided important manufacturing knowledge.

References

  1. Aish R (2013) First build your tools. Inside smart geometry: expanding the architectural possibilities of computational design. pp 36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks J (2016) Why BIM is still bankrupting your firm. Shoegnome 9:12Google Scholar
  3. Burns WE (1986) Computer-Aided Design (CAD). Ind Educ 75(6):10–11Google Scholar
  4. Daaboul J, Cunha CD, Bernard A, Laroche F (2011) Design for mass customization: product variety versus process variety. CIRP Ann 60(1):169–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis SM (1997) Future perfect. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldberg A, Robson D (1983) Smalltalk- 80: the language and its implementation. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Hundegger H (2001) Woodworking machineGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2006) Toward a parsimonious definition of traditional and electronic mass customization. J Prod Innov Manag 23(2):168–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krymsky, Y. (2015, December 11) The Architecture Software Revolution: From One Size Fits All to DIY. Retrieved January 18, 2017, from http://www.archdaily.com/778619/the-architecture-software-revolution-from-one-size-fits-all-to-diy
  10. Kymmell W (2007) Building information modeling: planning and managing construction projects with 4D CAD and simulations (McGraw-Hill Construction Series): planning and managing construction projects with 4D CAD and simulations. McGraw Hill Professional, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. McNeel R (2009) Rhinoceros 3D. Retrieved January 15Google Scholar
  12. McNeel R (2015) Grasshopper 3DGoogle Scholar
  13. Mork JH, Luczkowski M (2017) One algorithm, two timber bridges built in Orkdal, Norway. In Forum Wood Building/Nordic Trondheim 17. Faculty of Architecture and Design, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  14. Preisinger C, Heimrath M (2014) Karamba—A Toolkit for Parametric Structural Design. Structural Engineering International 24(2):217–221.  https://doi.org/10.2749/101686614X13830790993483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rapp EJ, Johnson GA (1980) Computer numerical control machine tool. Google Patents. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/patents/US4199814
  16. Scheurer F (2013) Digital craftsmanship: from thinking to modeling to building. Digital Workflows in Architecture. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 110–129Google Scholar
  17. Schumacher P (2008) Parametricism as style-Parametricist manifesto. 11th Architecture Biennale, Venice. pp 17–20Google Scholar
  18. Schumacher P, (2016) Parametricism 2.0: gearing up to impact the global built environment. Architectural Des 86(2):10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stehling H, Scheurer F, Roulier J (2017) Bridging the gap from cad to cam: concepts, caveats and a new grasshopper plug-in. In: Fabricate 2014: negotiating design & making (DGO-Digital original, pp 52–59). UCL Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1tp3c5w.10

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Haddal Mork
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcin Luczkowski
    • 1
  • Bendik Manum
    • 1
  • Anders Rønnquist
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations