Advertisement

Non-orthogonal Light Timber Frame Design: Using Digital Manufacturing Technologies to Facilitate Circular Economy Architecture

  • Gerard FinchEmail author
  • Guy Marriage
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 24)

Abstract

Orthogonal structural timber framing is the predominant method for building low density residential buildings in a large proportion of developed countries. Today this framing system is highly refined to be economically advantageous—making use of low-value and widely available materials. However, this construction product largely ignores the emerging ‘Circular Economy’ (CE) sustainability agenda. At the end of a buildings life, and when deconstruction is attempted, most materials integrated into an orthogonal frame are irreversibly damaged. Furthermore, deconstruction is time consuming and yields very few valuable materials. Thus, this research questions the suitability of conventional framing methods to achieve true life-cycle sustainability and suggests a series of radical non-orthogonal solutions in response. These solutions are centered around maximizing the recovery of all materials attached to (and located in) the structural frame at the end of a buildings life. Non-orthogonal frames are the superior solution as they are generally inherently resistant to lateral loads and can be dynamically modulated to fit within many different building conditions. The research uses computer-aided fabrication technology to integrate jointing and assembly conditions in the non-orthogonal timber frame geometry that substantially speeds up end-of-life deconstruction.

Keywords

Sustainable design Non-orthogonal structure Circular economy construction Timber frame 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the generous support of the New Zealand Institute of Building’s Charitable Trust, Carter Holt Harvey Limited, Makers of Architecture and Victoria University of Wellington in facilitating the fabrication and testing of non-orthogonal structural solutions. This work was funded in part by the Building Research Levy.

References

  1. Alderman D (2013) Housing and construction markets. UNECE/FAO Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2012–2013, 118Google Scholar
  2. Chen P (2014) Innovation of 1.5 layer space frames. J Struct Eng 60(B):153–158Google Scholar
  3. Curtis M (2015) Physical characteristics of new houses in 2014. Building Research New Zealand (BRANZ) Study Report 330, 5Google Scholar
  4. DoBH (2012) Dealing with timber in leaky buildings. A Guide for Builders and Building Professionals, Department of Building and Housing, New Zealand Government, 5Google Scholar
  5. EPA (2014) Advancing sustainable materials management: 2014 fact sheet assessing trends in material generation, recycling, composting, combustion with energy recovery and landfilling in the United States. Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America, 16Google Scholar
  6. Finch G (2018) Defab: prefabricated architecture for a circular economy. Unpublished thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, 1Google Scholar
  7. Forbes N (2018) Reusing Pinus radiata structurally in New Zealand. Unpublished thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, 12Google Scholar
  8. Heymann D (2017) The ugly pet. Places J, September 2017. Accessed 30 May 2018.  https://doi.org/10.22269/170917
  9. Inglis M (2009) Construction and demolition waste—best practice and cost saving. Ministry for the Environment, 1–12Google Scholar
  10. Marriage G (2016) Experimental construction in a timber house. In: Aurel M (ed) Proceedings of the 50th international conference of the architectural science association 2016, pp 685–694Google Scholar
  11. McDonough W (2016) ICEhouse™ Davos, Switzerland, William McDonough + Partners, Architecture and Community Design. Available from: mcdonoughpartners.com/projects/icehouse/. Accessed 1st May 2018Google Scholar
  12. McKeever D, Phelps B (1994) Wood products used in new single-family house construction: 1950 to 1992. For Prod J 44(11/12):66–74Google Scholar
  13. ModCell (2017) ModCell Systems; About Us. ModCell Straw Technology. Available from: modcell.com/about-us/. Accessed 5 June 2017Google Scholar
  14. Moller C (2016) CMA + U. Available from: cma+u.com. Accessed 21 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  15. Moon K, Connor J, Fernandez J (2007) Diagrid structural systems for tall buildings: characteristics and methodology for preliminary design. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 16(2):205–230.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parisio S (2006) Arsenic & old landfills: what we have learned from post-closure groundwater monitoring at inactive landfills in NY State. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 2006 SBRP Workshop on Arsenic and Landfills: Protecting Water Quality, 18Google Scholar
  17. Ramage M, Burridge H, Busse-Wicher M, Fereday G, Reynolds T, Shah D, Wu G, Li Yu, Fleming P, Densley-Tingley D, Allwood J, Dupree P, Linden, P, Scherman O (2017) The wood from the trees: the use of timber in construction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68, Part 1,2:333–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Webster M, Costello D (2005) Designing structural systems for deconstruction: how to extend a new building’s useful life and prevent it from going to waste when the end finally comes. In: Greenbuild conference, 9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations