Advertisement

Adaptive Timber Towers. An Evolutionary Prototype for the 21st Century Skyscraper

  • Alessandro BuffiEmail author
  • Gian Maria Angelini
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 24)

Abstract

The biological metaphor introduced by computational design, as well as the increasing theoretical framework of parametric architecture, opens new perspectives for both wood and skyscraper design. At the intersection of architecture, biology, and computer science, avant-garde designers are reshaping the historical relationship between nature and architecture fostering a natural approach to design which results in: structural lightness, rational use of energy and elegance. Wood seems to be a perfect material to engage with this new period of design research, and while timber towers are getting higher, there is a strong interest in understanding to which extent wood can represent a valuable alternative to those materials that have characterized the recent architectural debate. Analyzing the emerging type of the wooden skyscraper within the context of globalization, technological advances, and ecology; the authors present their vision for the 21th-century skyscraper. Based on parametric design and evolutionary principles, the proposed model can adapt to different contexts and conditions, providing different solutions as the result of the interaction with the surrounding environment.

Keywords

Parametric design Form-finding Environmental design High-rise buildings Complex timber structures Evolutionary algorithms Wooden skyscraper 

References

  1. Abrahamsen RB, Malo KA (2014) Structural design and assembly of “Treet”—a 14-story timber residential building in NorwayGoogle Scholar
  2. Bader J, Zitzler E (2008) Hype: an algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimizationGoogle Scholar
  3. Benros D, Duarte JP (2009) An integrated system for providing mass customized housing. Autom Constr 18:310–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergs J (2002) Effect of healthy workplaces on well-being and productivity of office workers, B en R Adviseurs voor Duurzaamheid, AmersfoortGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianconi F, Filippucci M, Buffi A (2017) Drawing, model and nature: form-finding one hundred years after on growth and form. In: Empler T (2017) 3D modeling and BIM, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome. ISBN: 978-88-49645019Google Scholar
  6. Bianconi F, Filippucci M, Buffi A (2017) Optimization and evolution in architectural morphogenesis. In: D’uva D (ed) Analyzing form and morphogenesis in modern architectural contexts. IGI Global, New York. ISBN: 978-1-5225-3993-3Google Scholar
  7. Biraghi M (2008) Storia dell’architettura contemporanea 2, Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi, TurinGoogle Scholar
  8. Causarano RM (2014) Sviluppi del pensiero sistemico nell’architettura contemporanea. Il principio di organizzazione/autoorganizzazione nel progetto architettonico, Dottorato di ricerca XXV ciclo, Università La Sapienza di RomaGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceccotti A, Lauriola MP, Pinna M, Sandhaas C (2006) SOFIE project—cyclic tests on cross-laminated wooden panels. In: Proceedings WCTE, Portland, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. China Daily (2007) World’s tallest pagoda inaugurated, 30 Apr 2007. Chinadaily.com.cn. Retrieved on 22 May 2008
  11. Desideri P, Nervi PL, Positano G (1979) Pier Luigi Nervi. Zanichelli, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  12. Fasoulaki E (2007) Genetic algorithms in architecture: a necessity or a trend? Paper presented at 10TH generative art international conference Milan, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  13. Granadeiro V, Duarte JP, Correia JR, Leal VMS (2013) Building envelope shape design in early stages of the design process: integrating architectural design systems and energy simulation. Autom Constr 32:196–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green MC (2012) The case for tall wood building, how mass timber offers a safe, economical and environmentally friendly alternative for tall building structures, mgb ARCHITECTURE + DESIGNGoogle Scholar
  15. Hensel M, Menges A (2006) Morpho-ecologies. Architectural Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Howeler E (2005) Skyscraper design of the recent past and for the near future. Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
  17. IESNA Lighting Measurements Committee, IES LM-83-12 (2012) Approved method: IES spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Imam M, Kolarevic B (2016) Towards resource generative skyscrapers. Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat research paperGoogle Scholar
  19. Jahn H, Sobek W (1999) Archi-neering. Hatje Cantz Verlag, Leverkusen, pp 12, 92Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell M (1996) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Boston, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Naturally Wood (2017) Construction of a tall wood building Brock Commons Tallwood House: construction overview. University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Paoletti I (2018) Mass customization in the era of industry 4.0: towards immaterial building technology. In: Hemmerling M, Cocchiarella L (eds) Informed architecture. Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53135-9_8Google Scholar
  23. Pone S (2011) Le tecniche della leggerezza. In: Materia, 70Google Scholar
  24. Portoghesi P (2007) The envelope and the visage. Materia 55Google Scholar
  25. Preisinger C (2006) Karamba parametric structural modeling—user manualGoogle Scholar
  26. Rechenberg I (1973) Evolutionsstrategie. Stuttgart, Holzmann-Froboog, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  27. Roudsari MS, Pak M (2013) Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In: Proceedings of the 13th international IBPSA conference Held in Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  28. Saroglou T, Meir IA, Theodosiou T, Givoni B (2017) Towards energy efficient skyscrapers. Energy Build 149:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schumacher P (2007) Arguing for elegance. In: Architectural designGoogle Scholar
  30. Schumacher P (2010) The parametric city, London 2010. In: Zaha Hadid—recent projects, A.D.A. Edita, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  31. Schumacher P (2011) The autopoiesis of architecture, a new framework for architecture. Wiley, West SessexGoogle Scholar
  32. Sumitomo Forestry Report (2018) New development concept W350 plan for wooden high-rise building, Published Feb 2018Google Scholar
  33. Thompson H, Waugh A, Weiss K-H, Wells M (2009) A process revealed. Murray & Sorrell FUEL Design & Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. USGBC, LEED v4 (2013) Reference guide for building design and construction (v4). US Green Building Council, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Web Japan, sponsored by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan (2007) One hundred years older than supposed? World Heritage PagodaGoogle Scholar
  36. Willis C (2004) Empire state building, 21 mesi per costruire il crattacielo più alto del mondo, Electra, MilanGoogle Scholar
  37. Yeang K (1999) The green skyscraper, the basis for design sustainable intensive buildings. Prestel, MunichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations