Advertisement

Beyond Form Definition: Material Informed Digital Fabrication in Timber Construction

  • David CorreaEmail author
  • Oliver David Krieg
  • AnnaLisa Meyboom
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 24)

Abstract

This paper introduces a series of prototypes investigating a new architectural language in wood that is driven by a critical approach to recent technical developments in design, fabrication and material. Although wood is slowly being recognized as an advanced material for future construction due to its high performance and sustainable nature, its differentiated and unpredictable material characteristics have not only been progressively overlooked, but even been viewed as a negative attribute. Wood’s varied dimensional range has been addressed through standardization, its heterogeneous fiber structure ground and reconstituted into homogeneous composites, and finally its complex aesthetic quality has even been caricaturized into a skin-deep plastic-wood veneer texture. This paper seeks to extend research on the implications of advanced robotic fabrication and its integration into design processes that also integrate cross-disciplinary knowledge into architectural software. As innovation in technology enables architects and engineers to engage with the complexities of the material, the potential of wood is becoming accessible, leading to a new material language. Through a series of full scale, robotically fabricated design prototypes, the material performance of wood is investigated as a driver for form; its fabrication and hygroscopic performance as a driver for assembly, and more importantly, the entire design-to-fabrication-process as a method for investigation into innovation and the structural and architectural potential of future wood.

Keywords

Robotic fabrication Computational design Material computation Elastic bending Timber structures Complex surfaces Wood joints 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The workshops presented in this paper were organized and supported by the Centre for Advanced Wood Processing, as well as the School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture at the University of British Columbia. Funding was provided by the Forestry Innovation Investment, Perkins+Will Vancouver, Perkins+Will Building Technology Lab, and the UBC SEEDS Sustainability Program.

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Iain MacDonald, Jason Chiu and Jörn Dettmer from the Centre for Advanced Wood Processing, as well as Dean Gregory from the UBC Campus and Community Planning, and David Gill from the SEEDS Sustainability Program. Further, the authors would like to thank all the participants of both workshops without whom the results would not have been that successful.

References

  1. Alcorn A (1996) Embodied energy coefficients of building materials. Centre for Building Performance Research, Victoria University of WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Antemann M (2013) Complex structures solutions in wood. Vancouver, BC, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechert S, Knippers J, Krieg O, Menges A, Schwinn T, Sonntag D (2016) Textile fabrication techniques for timber shells: elastic bending of custom-laminated veneer for segmented shell construction systems. In: Adriaenssens S, Gramazio F, Kohler M, Menges A, Pauly M (eds) Advances in architectural geometry 2016, vdf Hochschulverlag AG ETH Zurich, Zurich, pp 154–169. ISBN 978-3-7281-3778-4Google Scholar
  4. Boake TM (2012) Understanding steel design: an architectural design manual. Basel, Birkhäuser Google Scholar
  5. Burkhardt B (1978) IL 13: Multihalle Mannheim. Karl Krämer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng A, Gaudin T, Meyboom A, Neumann O, Tannert T (2015) Large scale wood surface structures. In: 3rd annual international conference on architecture and civil engineering (ACE 2015). Singapore, pp 13–14Google Scholar
  7. Collins P (1959) Concrete: the vision of a new architecture. Second Edition, 2004. McGill Queens University Press, Montreal & KingstonGoogle Scholar
  8. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Resource Efficiency Opportunities in the Building Sector (2014). COM, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  9. Correa D, Papadopoulou A, Guberan C, Jhaveri N, Reichert S, Menges A, Tibbits S (2015) 3D printed wood: programming hygroscopic material transformation. 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Mary Ann Liebert 2(3):106–116.  https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dinwoodie JM (2000) Timber: its nature and behaviour. E&FN Spon, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckelman CA (1998) The shrinking and swelling of wood and its effect on furniture. Forestry and natural resource 163. Purdue University, West Lafayette, I.N.Google Scholar
  12. Elliott CD (1992) Technics and architecture: the development of materials and systems for building. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  13. Gann DM (2000) Building innovation. Thomas Telford, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gengnagel C, Alpermann H, Knippers J, Lienhard J (2012) Active bending, a review on structures where bending is used as a self formation process. In: Proceedings of the international IASS symposium, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon JE (2003) Structures: or why things don’t fall down. Da Capo Press, BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Holstov A, Bridgens B, Farmer G (2015) Hygromorphic materials for sustainable responsive architecture. Constr Build Mater 98:570–582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kieran S, Timberlake J (2004) Refabricating architecture. How manufacturing methodologies are poised to transform building construction. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolb J (2008) Systems in timber engineering: loadbearing structures and component layers. Birkhäuser, BaselCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krieg O, Menges A (2013) Prototyping robotic production: development of elastically bent wood plate morphologies with curved finger joint seams. In: Gengnagel C, Kilian A, Nembrini J, Scheurer F (eds) Rethinking prototyping, proceedings of the design modelling symposium Berlin 2013, Verlag der Universität der Künste Berlin, pp 479–490. ISBN 978-3-89462-243-5Google Scholar
  20. Krieg O, Schwinn T, Menges A (2015) Integrative design computation for local resource effectiveness in architecture. In: Wang F, Prominski M (eds) Urbanization and locality: strengthening identity and sustainability by site-specific planning and design. Springer Science and Business Media, pp 123–143. ISBN 978-3-662-48492-0Google Scholar
  21. Lienhard J, Fleischmann M, Menges A (2011) Computational design synthesis: embedding material behaviour in generative computational processes. In: Proceedings of the 29th eCAADE conference, Ljubljana (Slovenia) 21–24 Sept 2011, pp 759-767. ISBN 978-9491207013Google Scholar
  22. Lienhard J, Schleicher S, Knippers J (2011) Bending-active structures. In: Research Pavilion ICD/ITKE, in symposium of the international association for shell and spatial structures 2011, London, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  23. Menges A (2011) Integrative design computation: integrating material behaviour and robotic manufacturing processes in computational design for performative wood constructions. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the ACADIA, pp 72–81Google Scholar
  24. Peters TF (1996) Building the 19th century. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  25. Picon A (2010) The first steps of construction in iron: problems posed by the introduction of a new construction material. In: Before steel. Niggli, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  26. Reichert S, Menges A, Correa D (2015) Meteorosensitive architecture: biomimetic building skins based on materially embedded and hygroscopically enabled responsiveness. Comput Aided Des 60:50–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rinke M, Schwartz J (2010) (a). The ambivalence of the revolution: an introduction. In: Before steel. Niggli, Zürich. In: Before steel: the introduction of structural iron and its consequences. Verlag Niggli, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  28. Rinke M, Schwartz J (2010) (b) The ambivalence of the revolution: an introduction. In: Before steel. Niggli, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  29. Robeller C, Weinand Y, Helm V, Thoma A, Gramazio F, Kohler M (2017) Robotic integral attachment. In: Menges A, Sheil B, Glynn R, Skavara M (eds) Fabricate 2017 conference proceedings. UCL Press, London, pp 92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowell RM (1995) One way to keep wood from going this way and that. Am Rec XXXVI:12–16Google Scholar
  31. Rüggeberg M, Burgert I (2015) Bio-inspired wooden actuators for large scale applications. Plos One 10(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Self M, Vercruysse E (2017) Infinite variations, radical strategies. In: Menges A, Sheil B, Glynn R, Skavara M (eds) Fabricate 2017 conference proceedings. UCL Press, London, pp 30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simonson C, Salonvaara M, Ojanen T (2001) Improving indoor climate and comfort with wooden structures. VTT PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  34. Slaughter ES (1998) Models of construction innovation. J Constr Eng Manag 124(3):226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stamm AJ (1964) Wood and cellulose science. Ronald Press Co., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  36. Tarkow H, Turner HD (1958) The swelling pressure of wood. For Prod J 8(7):193–197Google Scholar
  37. Taylor JE (2006) Three perspectives on innovation in interorganizational networks: systemic innovation, boundary object change, and the alignment of innovations and networks. Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor JE, Levitt RE (2005) Inter-organizational knowledge flow and innovation diffusion in project-based industries. In: System sciences HICSS’05 proceedings of the 38th annual hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  39. Wagenführ R (1999) Anatomie des Holzes. DRW Verlag, Leinfelden-EchterdingenGoogle Scholar
  40. Winch G (1998) Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Build Res Inf 26(5):268–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Correa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Oliver David Krieg
    • 2
  • AnnaLisa Meyboom
    • 3
  1. 1.School of ArchitectureUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Institute for Computational Design and ConstructionUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  3. 3.School of Architecture and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations