Advertisement

Strategic Behavior in Mobile Behavioral Intervention Platforms: Evidence from a Field Quasi-experiment on a Health Management App

  • Chunxiao LiEmail author
  • Bin Gu
  • Chenhui Guo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10983)

Abstract

In recent years, people have witnessed the growing popularity of mobile health applications, which represents a promising solution for health management. Developers of such mobile apps routinely deploy incentive programs, in which users receive financial rewards after achieving certain performance goals. In this paper, we seek to identify the effects of financial incentives, and to take a close examination at strategic behavior of users who self-report their performance. Drawing on the behavioral economics literature on incentives, we leverage a field quasi-experiment on a mobile health application to identify the effect of financial incentives. Using a difference-in-differences framework, we find that financial rewards lead to improvements in weight loss performance during the intervention period compared to the control group without financial rewards, but the performance difference does not persist after the removal of financial rewards at the end of the intervention period (i.e. no post-intervention effect). More importantly, we find evidence of strategic behavior: participants tend to over-report their initial body weight so as to increase the likelihood to reach performance goals and obtain the rewards. Further, we find that certain social networking features could possibly mitigate strategic behavior. In particular, participants who have more social connections and social activities are less likely to behave strategically. Our study contributes to the IS literature on leveraging economic incentives for online behavioral interventions and provides insights for the implementation of such incentives on digital health management platforms.

Keywords

Mobile health apps Digital behavioral interventions Financial incentives Strategic behavior Quasi-experiment Difference-in-differences 

References

  1. 1.
    Fox, S., Duggan, M.: Mobile health 2010. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Charness, G., Gneezy, U.: Incentives to exercise. Econometrica 77(3), 909–931 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park, A.: The New Science of How to Quit Smoking. TIME Health (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kwon, H.E., So, H., Han, S.P., Oh, W.: Excessive dependence on mobile social apps: a rational addiction perspective. Inf. Syst. Res. 27(4), 919–939 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghose, A., Han, S.P.: An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile internet. Manag. Sci. 57(9), 1671–1691 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yan, L., Tan, Y.: Feeling blue? Go online: an empirical study of social support among patients. Inf. Syst. Res. 25(4), 690–709 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghose, A., Goldfarb, A., Han, S.P.: How is the mobile internet different? Search costs and local activities. Information Systems Research 24(3), 613–631 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mayer, C., Morrison, E., Piskorski, T., Gupta, A.: Mortgage modification and strategic behavior: evidence from a legal settlement with Countrywide. Am. Econ. Rev. 104(9), 2830–2857 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gneezy, U., Meier, S., Rey-Biel, P.: When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econ. Perspect. 25(4), 191–209 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations