Abstract
Pioneers drive futures. The book chapter presents pioneer analysis as a useful approach for the analysis of transformations in the context of futures research and anticipation. The chapter begins with an introduction on how pioneers have typically been conceptualised in academic literature. We claim pioneering actions as analogous to weak signals of emerging futures, because they manifest possible futures that may be realised – or not. The chapter provides two methodological examples, which illustrate how pioneers can be identified, conceptualised and explored. Analysing pioneers creates critical understanding about the role of key actors who drive transformations and create the futures. Pioneers tackle uncertainty with problem-solving and by identifying systemic bottlenecks. Therefore, the actions of pioneers may have an emancipatory effect and provide leverage points for broader changes. In terms of policy relevance, we are interested in how policies can support those pioneers who aim to shape society in a positive way and enable desirable futures to be achieved. Pioneer analysis is also interested in the positive and negative outcomes, if such futures are realised. The chapter concludes by discussing areas for further methodological development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this particular case, the transformation envisioned was a societal one towards a future 100% renewable energy society, and understanding how it could be realized by different actors in different countries and regions.
- 2.
References
Abson, David J., Joern Fischer, Julia Leventon, Jens Newig, Thomas Schomerus, Ulli Vilsmaier, Henrik von Wehrden, Paivi Abernethy, Christopher D. Ives, Nicolas W. Jager, and Daniel J. Lang. 2016. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
Aggestam, M. 2008. The myth of entrepreneurship. In Organizational epics and sagas, ed. M. Kostera, 14–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583603_3.
Amara, R. 1981. The futures field: Searching for definitions and boundaries. The Futurist 15 (1): 25–29.
Beal, G.M., E.M. Rogers, and J.M. Bohlen. 1957. Validity of the concept of stages in the adoption process. Rural Sociology 22 (2): 166–168.
Bell, Martin, and Paulo N. Figueiredo. 2012. Building innovative capabilities in latecomer emerging market firms: Some key issues. In Innovative firms in emerging market countries, ed. Edmund Amann and John Cantwell, 24–110. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646005.003.0002.
Bell, Wendell. 1996. Foundations of futures studies: Human science for a new era: History, purposes, knowledge. 3rd Printing edition. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Boutellier, R., and M. Heinzen. 2014a. The myth of the Pioneer. In Growth through innovation. Management for professionals, 71–84. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04016-5_6.
———. 2014b. Pirates, pioneers, innovators and imitators. In Growth through innovation. Management for professionals, 85–96. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04016-5_7.
Bradfield, R., G. Wright, G. Burt, G. Cairns, and K.V.D. Heijden. 2005. The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures 37 (8): 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003.
Brush, Candida G. 2008. Pioneering strategies for entrepreneurial success. Business Horizons 51 (1): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.09.001.
Covin, Jeffrey G., Dennis P. Slevin, and Michael B. Heeley. 2000. Pioneers and followers. Journal of Business Venturing 15 (2): 175–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00015-9.
Dalling, J.W. 2008. In Pioneer Species, In Encyclopedia of Ecology, ed. Sven Erik Jørgensen and Brian D. Fath, 2779–2782. Oxford: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00534-6. isbn:9780080454054.
Dator, J. 2009. Alternative futures at the Manoa school. Journal of Futures Studies 14 (2): 1–18.
Day, George S., and Paul J.H. Schoemaker. 2006. Peripheral vision: Detecting the weak signals that will make or break your company. 1st ed. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Drucker, Peter F. 2014. Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Routledge.
Durepos G., Mills J.H., Mills A.J. 2008. The Pan American dream and the myth of the Pioneer. In: Kostera M. (eds) Organizational Epics and sagas. Palgrave Macmillan, London https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583603_14, pp. 156–168.
Elkington, John, Pamela Hartigan, and Alejandro Litovsky. 2010. From Enterprise to ecosystem: Rebooting the scale debate. In Scaling social impact, 83–102. Social Entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-11356-5_6.
Fuller, Ted, and Lorraine Warren. 2006. Entrepreneurship as foresight: A complex social network perspective on Organisational foresight. Futures 38 (8): 956–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.016.
Gladwell, M. 2000. The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.
Gordon, Adam. 2009. Future savvy. Identifying trends to make better decisions, manage uncertainty, and profit from change. New York: American Management Association.
Heinonen, Sirkka, and Juho Ruotsalainen. 2012. Toward the age of neo-entrepreneurs. World Future Review 4 (2): 123–133.
Heinonen, Sirkka. 2017. Chapter 8: Pioneer analysis and international cultural changes. Application of positrend and negatrend analysis in the identification of cultural change. In How do we explore our futures? Acta Futura Fennica, ed. Osmo Kuusi, Sirkka Heinonen, and Hazel Salminen, vol. 10, 241–251. Helsinki: Finnish Society for Futures Studies.
Hills, Jeremy M., and Evanthie Michalena. 2017. Renewable energy pioneers are threatened by EU policy reform. Renewable Energy 108 (August): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.042.
Hiltunen, Elina. 2008. The future sign and its three dimensions. Futures 40 (3): 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.08.021.
———. 2010. “Weak signals in organizational futures learning.” Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki: Aalto University School of Economics. http://epub.lib.aalto.fi/fi/diss/?cmd=show&dissid=400.
Hiltunen, E. 2013. Foresight and innovation – How companies are coping with the future? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Inayatullah, S. 2008. Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight 10: 1.
Jacob, Jeffrey. 1997. New pioneers. The back-to-land movement and the search for a sustainable future. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
de Jouvenel, Hugues. 2004. An invitation to foresight. Paris: Futuribles.
Karjalainen, Joni, Heinonen, Sirkka, Ruotsalainen, Juho, and Byrne, Rob. 2018. Radical solar startups in Kenya and Tanzania. Neo-Carbon Energy WP1 Working Paper 2/2018. Finland Futures Research Centre: University of Turku.
Lang, Merja, Joni Karjalainen, and Sirkka Heinonen. 2016. “Glocal Insights to Neo-Carbon Energy and Its Forerunners.” Neo-Carbon Energy WP1 Working Paper 4/2016. Turku: Finland Futures Research Centre and University of Turku.
Loorbach, Derk, and Jan Rotmans. 2010. The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures 42 (3): 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009.
Lustig, Patricia. 2015. Strategic foresight. Learning from the future. Axminster: Triarchy.
Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Mazzucato, Mariana. 2013. The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. 1st ed. Anthem Press, 266 p.
Meadows, Donella. 2008. Thinking in systems: A primer. London: Routledge/Earthscan.
Miller, R., Poli, R., & Rossel, P. 2014. The discipline of anticipation: Exploring key issues. UNESCO, The Rockefeller Foundation.
Nadin, M. 2012. Prolegomena: What speaks in favor of an inquiry into anticipatory processes. In Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations, ed. J. Rosen, xv–lx. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Nash, D., G. Kass-Simon, and P. Farnes. 1990. Women in science: Righting the record. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Nygrén, Nina A., Panu Kontio, Jari Lyytimäki, Vilja Varho, and Petri Tapio. 2015. Early adopters boosting the diffusion of sustainable small-scale energy solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 46 (June): 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.031.
O’Neill, K., and D. Gibbs. 2016. Rethinking green entrepreneurship - fluid narratives of the green economy. Environment and Planning A 48 (9): 1727–1749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16650453.
Poli, R. 2017. Introduction to anticipation studies. Anticipation science 1. Cham: Springer.
———. 2009. The complexity of anticipation. The Balkan Journal of Philosophy 1 (1): 19–29.
Poli, Roberto. 2017a. Pragmatic Utopias, Presentation, Anticipation Workshop: Trento 6–8 April 2017, 44 ppt.
———. 2017b. Introduction to anticipation. Anticipation Science 1. Springer.
Rosen, R. 1985. Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations. 1st ed. Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph 1934. Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle, Harvard Economic Studies 46.
Sperling, Karl. 2017. How does a Pioneer Community energy project succeed in practice? The case of the Samsø renewable Energy Island. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 71 (May): 884–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.116.
Stirling, Andrew. 2015. Emancipating transformation: From controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical Progress. In The politics of green transformations, ed. Ian Scoones, Melissa Leach, and Peter Newell, 54–67. London: Routledge http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/64945/.
Sovacool, B.K., and B. Brossmann. 2013. Fantastic futures and three American energy transitions. Science as Culture 22 (2): 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786999.
Spar, D. 2001. Pirates, prophets and pioneers: Business and politics along the technological frontier. Random House Business Books. isbn:9780712670944 352 p.
Tuomi, Ilkka. 2002. Networks of innovation. Change and meaning in the age of the internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UNGC. 2017. UN global compact seeks out 2017 SDG pioneers. United Nations Global Compact. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpiFP916hHQ&feature=youtu.be.
van der Heijden, Kees. 2005. Scenarios – The art of strategic conversation. 2nd ed. Wiley., ISBN: 978-0-470-02368-6 382 p.
van Notten, P.W.F., J. Rotmans, M.B.A. van Asselt, and D.S. Rothman. 2003. An updated scenario typology. Futures 35 (5): 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-3287(02)00090-3.
Wagner, Rodrigo, and Andrés Zahler. 2015. New exports from emerging markets: Do followers benefit from pioneers? Journal of Development Economics 114 (May): 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.12.002.
Walrave, Bob, Madis Talmar, Ksenia S. Podoynitsyna, A. Georges L. Romme, Geert P.J. Verbong. 2018. A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, ISSN 0040-1625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011.
Wangel, Josefin. 2011a. Exploring social structures and Agency in Backcasting Studies for sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (5): 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.007.
———. 2011b. Change by whom? Four ways of adding actors and governance in Backcasting studies. Futures 43 (8): 880–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.06.012.
Wiek, Arnim, and Daniel J. Lang. 2016. Transformational sustainability research methodology. In Sustainability science, ed. Harald Heinrichs, Pim Martens, Gerd Michelsen, and Arnim Wiek, 31–41. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heinonen, S., Karjalainen, J. (2019). Pioneer Analysis as a Futures Research Method for Analysing Transformations. In: Poli, R., Valerio, M. (eds) Anticipation, Agency and Complexity. Anticipation Science, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03623-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03623-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03622-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03623-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)