Skip to main content

Time Series for Spatial Econometricians

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Spatial Panel Data

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 1024 Accesses

Abstract

Key developments in the econometric analysis of nonstationary time series are reviewed. We begin by defining nonstationarity, which arises when data generating processes (DGP) contain unit roots. The distinction is made between difference stationarity where time trends are stochastic, and trend stationarity where time trends are deterministic.

We recall that hypotheses involving levels of nonstationary time series cannot be tested by using their first differences or their deviations from deterministic time trends. We also recall that in structural vector autoregressions the structural parameters are under-identified. Consequently, SVAR models merely provide ex post narratives for the time series involved.

The concepts of “spurious” regression and “nonsense” regression, which arise when time series data are nonstationary, are introduced. The functional central limit theorem is presented, and its role in the asymptotic theory of nonstationary time series is described. Alternative statistical tests for unit roots are reviewed under the null hypotheses of nonstationarity and stationarity. Alternative statistical tests for spurious and nonsense regression (cointegration tests) are compared and contrasted.

Parameter estimates for variables that are cointegrated are “super-consistent”. Instead of root—T consistency, as in stationary time series, they may be T—consistent or T—consistent depending on whether the data have stochastic time trends. Super-consistency radically changes the properties of estimators and the conditions for identification. In particular, OLS parameter estimates for endogenous variables are super-consistent.

We also review panel unit root tests and cointegration tests for independent and strongly dependent panel data. Finally, we introduce ARCH models (autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity), and distinguish between unconditional and conditional heteroscedasticity

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baltagi BH (2013) Econometric analysis of panel data, 5th edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH, Bresson G, Pirotte A (2007) Panel unit root tests and spatial dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A, Carrion-I-Silvestre JL (2017) Testing for panel cointegration using common correlated effects estimators. J Time Ser Anal 38:610–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson JEH (1994) Stochastic limit theory: an introduction for econometricians. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson R, MacKinnon JG (2009) Econometric theory and methods. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey D, Fuller W (1981) Likelihood ratio tests for autoregressive processes with a unit root. Econometrica 49:1057–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot G, Rothenberg T, Stock J (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders W (2004) Applied time series analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle R (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity and with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflations. Econometrica 50:987–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle R, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 35:251–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Yoo BS (1991) Cointegrated economic time series: an overview with new results. In: Engle RF, Granger CWJ (eds) Long run economic relationships: readings in cointegration. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson NR, MacKinnon JG (2002) Distributions for error correction tests for cointegration. Econ J 5:285–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. J Econ 2:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groen J, Kleibergen F (2003) Likelihood-based cointegration analysis in panels of vector error-correction models. J Bus Econ Stat 21:295–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadri K (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econ J 3:148–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry DF (1995) Dynamic econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Im K, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root. J Econ 54:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson R, Lyhagen J, Löthgren M (2001) Likelihood-based cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels. Econ J 4:109–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Maddala GS (1997) Bootstrapping cointegrated regressions. J Econ 80:297–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 1:19–46

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon JG (1996) Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. J Appl Economet 11:601–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS, Kim I-M (1999) Unit roots, cointegration and structural change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwald-Lenum M (1992) A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 54:461–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economet Theor 20:597–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2015) Time series and panel data econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB (1986) Understanding spurious regressions in econometrics. J Econ 33(3):311–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Moon H (1999) Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica 67:1057–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin Y (1994) A residual-based test of the null of cointegration against the alternative of no cointegration. Economet Theor 10:91–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 58:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock J (1987) Asymptotic properties of least squares estimates of cointegrating vectors. Econometrica 55:1035–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61(4):783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel based data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule GU (1897) On the theory of correlation. J R Stat Soc 60:812–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule GU (1926) Why do we sometimes get nonsense-correlations between time series? A study in sampling and the nature of time series. J R Stat Soc 89:1–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beenstock, M., Felsenstein, D. (2019). Time Series for Spatial Econometricians. In: The Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Spatial Panel Data. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03614-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics