Skip to main content

Investigating the Validity of Using Automated Writing Evaluation in EFL Writing Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Technologies for Education (SETE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11284))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1191 Accesses

Abstract

This study aims to follow an argument-based approach to validation of using automated essay evaluation (AWE) system with the example of Pigai, a Chinese AWE program, in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing assessment in China. First, an interpretive argument was developed for its use in the course of College English. Second, three sub-studies were conducted to seek evidence of claims related to score evaluation, score generalization, score explanation, score extrapolation and feedback utilization. Major findings are: (1) Pigai yields scores that are accurate indicators of the quality of a test performance sample; (2) its scores are consistent across tasks in the same form; (3) its scoring features represent the construct of interest to some extent, yet problems of construct under-representation and construct-irrelevant features still exist; (4) its scores are consistent with teachers’ judgments of students’ writing ability; (5) its feedback has a positive impact on students’ development of writing ability, but to some extent. These results reveal that AWE can only be used as a supplement to human evaluation, but can never replace the latter.

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, P. R. China (Number 17YJC740102) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Number 2018PY22).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Warschauer, M.: Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda. Lang. Teach. Res. 10, 1–24 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Valenti, S., Neri, F., Cucchiarelli, A.: An overview of current research on automated essay grading. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 2, 319–330 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xi, X.: Automated scoring and feedback systems: where are we and where are we heading? Lang. Test. 27, 291–300 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Williamson, D.M., Xi, X., Breyer, F.J.: A framework for evaluation and use of automated scoring. Educ. Meas.: Issues Pract. 31, 2–13 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Z.: Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: a case study. ELT J. 70, 1–12 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bai, L., Hu, G.: In the face of fallible AWE feedback: how do students respond? Educ. Psychol. 37, 67–81 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, J.: Same text different processing? Exploring how raters’ cognitive and meta-cognitive strategies influence rating accuracy in essay scoring. Assessing Writ. 27, 37–53 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Linacre, J.M.: A User’s Guide to FACETS: Rasch-Model Computer Programs. MESA Press, Chicago (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Green, A.: Verbal Protocol Analysis in Language Testing Research: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McNamara, T.F.: Measuring Second Language Performance. Longman, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Task 1 (A Technological Invention)

Write an essay of no less than 150 words about a technological invention. Your writing should include four points: 1. An introduction of the invention. 2. Its positive impact on peoples’ life. 3. Its negative impact on people’s life. 4. Your opinion.

Appendix 2: Task 2 (Fame – Good or Evil?)

Write an essay of no less than 150 words on the topic “Fame-Good or Evil?” Your paper should cover the following points: 1. The advantages of being famous. 2. The disadvantages of being famous. 3. Your attitude towards fame.

Appendix 3: The Internet and Our Daily Lives

Write an essay of no less than 150 words on the topic “The Internet and Our Daily Lives”. Your paper should include: 1. Internet is important in our daily lives. 2. Internet has also disadvantages. 3. What shall we do to make better use of Internet?

Appendix 4: A Questionnaire of Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Pigai

  1. 1.

    Is Pigai score consistent with your observation of students’ writing ability?

    A. Consistent B. Largely consistent C. Largely inconsistent D. Inconsistent

  2. 2.

    Is Pigai’s feedback beneficial to improve students’ writing ability? Why?

  3. 3.

    Would you like to let students receive Pigai’s feedback in the future? (Yes/No).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xu, Y. (2018). Investigating the Validity of Using Automated Writing Evaluation in EFL Writing Assessment. In: Hao, T., Chen, W., Xie, H., Nadee, W., Lau, R. (eds) Emerging Technologies for Education. SETE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11284. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03580-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03580-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03579-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03580-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics