Introducing Mobile Technology for Enhancing Teaching and Learning at the College of Business Education in Tanzania: Teachers and Students’ Perspectives

  • Godfrey MwandosyaEmail author
  • Calkin Suero Montero
  • Esther Rosinner Mbise
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 111)


Teachers and students in higher education institutions use mobile technologies in teaching and learning. However, in Tanzanian higher education institutions (HEIs), there is little known regarding to perspectives of teachers and students on the usefulness of mobile technologies on teaching and learning. A modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was applied to obtain teachers and students’ views on how mobile technologies enhance teaching and learning. A sample of 80 teachers and 100 students from the College of Business Education (CBE) was used. A survey questionnaire seeking views of teachers and students was used. Qualitative data were analyzed through the thematic content analysis while quantitative data was analyzed by IBM SPSS (Version 23) descriptive statistics. The results indicates that both teachers and students view mobile technologies as an important program in enhancing teaching and learning. Furthermore, awareness, training, and involvement in the mobile technology requirements’ design are crucial for technology intake.


Mobile technology Teachers and student’s technology use perspectives Teaching and learning enhancement Higher education institutions Tanzania TAM 


  1. 1.
    Lwoga, E.T.: Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning management systems in Tanzania. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol. 10(1), 4–21 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mtebe, J.S., Raisamo, R.: Investigating students’ behavioural intention to adopt and use mobile learning in higher education in East Africa. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol. 10(3), 4–20 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mwandosya, G.I., Suero Montero, C.: Towards a mobile education tool for higher education teachers: a user requirements definition. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Science Technology and Innovation Africa Conference, Cape Town (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mtebe, J.S, Kondoro, A.W.: Using mobile Moodle to enhance Moodle LMS accessibility and usage at the University of Dar es Salaam. In: IST-Africa 2016 Conference Proceedings, Dar es Salaam (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mtega, W.P., Bernard, R., Sanare, R.: Using mobile phones for teaching and learning purposes in higher learning institutions: the case of Sokoine University of Agriculture in Tanzania. In: 5th UbuntuNet Alliance Annual Conference, Dar es Salaam (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ministry of Education and Vocational Training: Education and Training Policy. United Republic of Tanzania - Ministry of Education and Vocational Training, Dar es Salaam (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ndibalema, P.: Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of Information Communication Technology (ICT) as a pedagogical tool in secondary schools in Tanzania: the case of Kondoa District. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2(2), 1–16 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., Sendurur, P.: Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: a critical relationship. Comput. Educ. 59, 423–435 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oparaocha, G.O., Pokidko, D.H.: Educating the 21st century learners: are educators using appropriate learning models for honing skills in the mobile age? J. Entrep. Educ. 20(2), 1–15 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tedre, M., Ngumbuke, F., Kemppainen, J.: Infrastructure, human capacity, and high hopes: a decade of development of e-learning in a Tanzanian HEI. Redefining Digit. Divid. High. Educ. 7(1), 1–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Virvou, M., Alepis, E.: Mobile education features in authoring tools for personalized tutoring. Comput. Educ. 44(1), 53–68 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fathema, N., Shannon, D., Ross, M.: Expanding the technology acceptance (TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. J. Online Learn. Teach. 11(2), 210–232 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park, S.Y., Nam, M.-W., Cha, S.: University students’ behavioural intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43(4), 592–605 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oye, N.D., Iahad, N.A., Rabin, Z.: A model of ICT acceptance and use for teachers in higher education institutions. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Commun. Netw. 1(1), 22–40 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park, Y.: A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile learning into four types. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 12(2), 78–102 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng, Y.Y.: Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Res. 22(3), 361–390 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, M.: Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention towards e-learning: an extension of the expectation - confirmation model. Comput. Educ. 54(2), 506–516 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin, W.-S., Wang, C.-H.: Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: a contigency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 90–107 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Venter, P., Van Rensburg, M.J., Davis, A.: Drivers of learning management system use in a South African open and distance learning institution. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 28(2), 183–198 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and research agenda on interventions. J. Inf. Technol. 39, 273–315 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Teo, T., Ursavaş, Ö.F., Bahçekapili, E.: Efficiency of the technology acceptance model to explain pre-service teachers’ intention to use technology: a Turkish study. Campus Wide Inf. Syst. 28(2), 93–101 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fathema, N., Sutton, K.: Factors influencing faculty members’ learning management systems adoption behavior: An analysis using the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Trends Econ. Manag. Technol. 2(6), 20–28 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Godfrey Mwandosya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Calkin Suero Montero
    • 2
  • Esther Rosinner Mbise
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Business Education, ICT and MathematicsDar es SalaamTanzania
  2. 2.School of ComputingUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations