Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Social Responsibility and Sustainability pp 203–219Cite as

Managing Incomplementarity: Implementing Social Responsibility in Companies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Publicly listed companies nowadays face contradictory expectations from their institutionalised environments concerning social responsibility and sustainability (SRS) on the one hand, and financial performance on the other. From the perspective of the financial logic, the economic performance of social responsibility is uncertain, whereas sustainability views the financial logic as obstructive to achieving long-term regenerative capacity of economic and non-economic resources. Thus, enacting both institutional logics in decision-making and strategy can create goal-conflicts or incomplementarity within organisations. Incomplementarity is an obstacle to the implementation of SRS. Therefore, incomplementarity needs to be resolved and managed in order to ensure organisational reproduction. This paper presents an empirical analysis of the organisational social responsibility strategies dealing with the incomplementary institutional logics in German publicly listed companies. The results are based on 14 qualitative management interviews in three German publicly listed companies (DAX30) and emerge from a current research project granted by the German Research Foundation (DFG). Organisational strategies as patterns of managing incomplementarity internally are sketched which can be shown to be interwoven with institutional intentions as part of institutional work. Finally, an integrated framework is proposed for analysing the management of incomplementarity as an interplay between social responsibility strategies and institutional intentions that can serve to assess the different outcomes of social responsibility and sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Banerjee SB (2008) Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the ugly. Crit Sociol 34:51–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard C (1974) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert J (2010) Sind Unternehmen sozial verantwortlich? In: Schumann O, Brink A, Beschorner T (eds) Unternehmensethik. Forschungsperspektiven zur Verhältnisbestimmung von Unternehmen und Gesellschaft. Metropolis, Marburg, pp 107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer J (2006) Vom “kooperativen Kapitalismus” zum Finanzmarktkapitalismus—eine Ursachenanalyse. In: Brinkmann U, Krenn K, Schief S (eds) Endspiel des kooperativen Kapitalismus? VS, Opladen, pp 35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer J, Hiß S, Wielgohs J (2007) Unternehmen zwischen Aktionärsinteresse und sozialer Verantwortung. Berliner Debatte Initial 18(4/5):3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiral O (2007) Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a rational myth? Organ Sci 18:127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiapello E (2015) Financialisation of valuation. Human Stud 38:13–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho CH, Laine M, Roberts RW, Rodrigue M (2015) Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Account Organ Soc 40:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LT, Cornelissen J (2015) Organizational Transparency as myth and metaphor. Eur J Soc Theory 18:132–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch C (2005) Three meanings of complementarity. Socio-Econ Rev 3:359–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curbach J (2009) Die Corporate-Social-Responsibility-Bewegung. VS, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: Zucker LG (ed) Institutional patterns and organizations. Ballinger, Cambridge, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein GA (2005) Financialization and the world economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Am J Soc 113:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland WN, Stevens ML (1998) Commensuration as a social process. Annu Rev Soc 24:313–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming P, Jones MT (2013) The end of corporate social responsibility: crisis & critique. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In: Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds) Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 232–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Garsten C, de Montoya ML (eds) (2008) Transparency in a new global order. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. Acad Manag J 49:27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Jennings PD, Hinings B (2015) Sustainability and organizational change. An institutional perspective. In: Henderson R, Gulati R, Tushman M (eds) Leading sustainable change. An organizational perspective. University Press, Oxford, pp 323–355

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse R (2006) Der Neo-Institutionalismus als makrosoziologische Kulturtheorie. In: Senge K, Hellmann K-U (eds) Einführung in den Neo-Institutionalismus. VS, Wiesbaden, pp 150–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintz B (2010) Numerische Differenz. Überlegungen zu einer Soziologie des (quantitativen) Vergleichs. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39:162–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiß S (2006) Warum übernehmen Unternehmen gesellschaftliche Verantwortung? Ein soziologischer Erklärungsversuch. Campus, Frankfurt/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiß S (2013) The politics of financialization of sustainability. Competition and Change 17:234–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiß S (2014) Was bleibt von der Nachhaltigkeit nach ihrer Finanzialisierung? In: Heires M, Nölke A (eds) Politische Ökonomie der Finanzialisierung. SpringerVS, Wiesbaden, pp 211–224

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in norwegian fisheries. Adm Sci Q 40:398–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings PD, Zandbergen PA (1995) Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):1015–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz MS, Block ES (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In: Greenwood R, Olivier C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London, pp 243–275

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence TB, Suddaby R (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In: Clegg St. R, Hardy C, Lawrence TB, Nord WR (eds) The Sage handbook of organization studies. Sage, London, pp 215–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B (2009) (Eds) Institutional work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B (2011) Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization. J Manage Inq 20:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann L (2009) Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: the cases of carbon and cost–benefit. Account Organ Soc 34:499–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2011) Organisation und Entscheidung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malsch B (2013) Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility. Account Organ Soc 38:149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2014). Qualitative content analysis. theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations. Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Soc 83:340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne MJ, Gray R (2013) W(h)ither ecology? the triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. J Bus Ethics 118(1):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münch R (2008) Jenseits der Sozialpartnerschaft. Die Konstruktion der sozialen Verantwortung von Unternehmen in der Weltgesellschaft“. In Maurer A, Schimank U (eds) Die Gesellschaft der Unternehmen—die Unternehmen der Gesellschaft. VS, Wiesbaden, pp 163–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad Manage Rev 16(1):145–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1992) The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organ Stud 13:563–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton JD, Weick KE (1990) Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 15:203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F, Castaldo S, Misani N, Tencati A (2010) The relationship between corporate responsibility and brand loyalty in retailing: the mediating role of trust. In: Smith NC, Bhattacharya CB, Vogel D, Levine DI (eds) Global challenges in responsible business. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 191–214

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reichertz J (2016) Qualitative und interpretative Sozialforschung. Eine Einladung. VS Springer, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin K, Wedlin L (2008) Circulating ideas: imitation, translation and editing. In: Greenwood R, Olivier C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE, London, pp 218–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl D, Becker KH (2006) Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann’s contribution to organization studies. Organization 13:9–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P (1949) TVA and the grass roots: a study in the sociology of formal organization. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge K (2007) Ist corporate social responsibility ein ökonomischer Wert?. Berl Debatte Init (18)4/5:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge K (2011) Das neue am neo-institutionalismus. Der Neo-Institutionalismus im Kontext der Organisationswissenschaft, VS, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Senge K (2015) Zur Translation und Finanzialisierung von Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Graf A, Möller Ch (eds) Bildung, Macht, Eliten. Campus, Frankfurt/M, pp 266–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge K (2018 forthcoming) Corporate Social Responsibility als Legitimationsprinzip von Unternehmen in der World Polity. Springer VS, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge K, Dombrowski S, Lawrence TB (2015) Suddaby, Roy: Institutions and Institutional Work. In: Kühl S (eds). Schlüsselwerke der Organisationssoziologie. VS, Wiesbaden, pp 400–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo M-G, Creed WED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):222–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark D (2011) The sense of dissonance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, Accounts of Worth in Economic Life

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot L (2007) The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements. moving between the familiar and the public. Eur J Soc Theory 10:409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Am J Soc 105(3):801–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. In: Greenwood R, Olivier C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. SAGE, London, pp 76–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma C, Lawrence TB (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work. Adm Sci Q 55:189–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker LG (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Am Sociol Rev 42(5):726–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Sociology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Emil-Abderhalden-Straße 26-27, 06108, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Simon Dabrowski

  2. Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hamburg, Sedanstraße 19, 20146, Hamburg, Germany

    Florian Lottermoser

Authors
  1. Simon Dabrowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Florian Lottermoser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Lottermoser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. FTZ-NK, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dabrowski, S., Lottermoser, F. (2019). Managing Incomplementarity: Implementing Social Responsibility in Companies. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Social Responsibility and Sustainability. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03562-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation