Skip to main content

Graphs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Graphs in Perturbation Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 539 Accesses

Abstract

The most central notion of this thesis is the graph. For reasons that will become clear later, we will not resort to the traditional definition of a graph as a set of vertices and a set of edges. Our definition includes so called multigraphs, graphs where multiple edges are allowed, in a natural way. We will consider sets of half-edges and vertices to be the building blocks of a graph. Based on those sets, a graph consists of a map that associates half-edges with vertices and an involution on the set of half-edges that maps a half-edge to its other half. Naturally, two half-edges make up an edge this way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A simple graph is a graph without selfloops or multiple edges between the same pair of vertices.

  2. 2.

    A bipartite graph is a graph, whose vertex set is the union of two disjoints sets of mutually disconnected vertices.

  3. 3.

    These numbers are called the telephone numbers [5, Example II.13].

  4. 4.

    Equivalently, \(\mathfrak {G}_{m,k}\) is the quotient of \(\mathfrak {G}^{\text {lab}}_{m,k}\) under the group action \(*\), \(\mathfrak {G}_{m,k} = \mathfrak {G}^{\text {lab}}_{m,k}/P_{m,k}\).

  5. 5.

    Arguably, it would be clearer to use a map \(\pi \) that maps an arbitrary graph to its unique isomorphic representative in \(\mathfrak {G}\). The product would then read, \(m (\Gamma _1 \otimes \Gamma _2) = \pi ( \Gamma _1 \sqcup \Gamma _2)\). We will omit this map \(\pi \) to agree with the notation commonly used in the literature.

References

  1. Conant J, Kassabov M, Vogtmann K (2012) Hairy graphs and the unstable homology of Mod(g; s), Out(Fn) and Aut(Fn). J Topol 6(1):119–153

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yeats K (2008) Growth estimates for Dyson-Schwinger equations. Ph.D. thesis, Boston University

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gurau R, Rivasseau V, Sfondrini A (2014) Renormalization: an advanced overview. arXiv:1401.5003

  4. McKay BD (1981) Practical graph isomorphism. Congr Numer 30:45–87

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Flajolet P, Sedgewick R (2009) Analytic combinatorics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holt DF, Eick B, O’Brien EA (2005) Handbook of computational group theory. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Janson S (1993) The birth of the giant component. Random Struct Algorithms 4(3):233–358

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Harary F, Palmer EM (2014) Graphical enumeration. Elsevier, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Borinsky .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borinsky, M. (2018). Graphs. In: Graphs in Perturbation Theory. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03541-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics