Concluding Remarks

  • Vladimir Udalov
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Climate Studies book series (BRIEFSCLIMATE)


This chapter summarizes the main findings of this book. Based on the derived results, possible policy options are presented. However, the results and implications should be considered in the light of a number of limitations, which are discussed and provide suggestions for future research efforts.


Conclusion Limitations Future research avenues 


  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. and Rothengatter, T., 2005. “A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 25, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins, J., Thomas, G., Willis, R. and Wilsdon, J., 2003. “Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Influencing public behaviour for environmental goals.” London: Demos and Green Alliances.Google Scholar
  3. Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2005. “Securing the Future: delivering UK Sustainable Development Strategy.” London: Defra.Google Scholar
  4. Dienes, C., 2016. “On the Behaviour and Attitudes of Firms and Individuals towards Resource Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation.” Josef EUL Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Faber, J., Schroten, A., Bles, M., Sevenster, M. and Markowska, A., 2012. “Behavioural climate change mitigation options and their appropriate inclusion in quantitative longer term policy scenarios.” Delft: CE Delft.Google Scholar
  6. Grasso, M., 2004. “Climate change: the global public good.” Working paper del Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale - Universita' degli Studi di Milano Bicocca.Google Scholar
  7. Harrison, G. W. and List, J., 2004. “Field Experiments.” Journal of Economic Literature 42(4), 1009–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. IPCC, 2013. “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  9. OECD, 2011. “Greening Household Behaviour: The Role of Public Policy.” OECD Publishing, Paris:Google Scholar
  10. OECD, 2014. “Cities and Climate Change.” OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Pereira, J. C., 2015. “Environmental issues and international relations, a new global (dis)order – the role of International Relations in promoting a concerted international system.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 58(1), 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rassen, J. A., Schneeweiss, S., Glynn, R. J., Mittleman, M. A. and Brookhart, M. A., 2009. “Instrumental variable analysis for estimation of treatment effects with dichotomous outcomes.” American Journal of Epidemiology 169(3), 273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Söderholm, P., 2010. “Environmental Policy and Household Behaviour: Sustainability and Everyday Life.” Washington DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Sonigo, P. et al., 2012. “Policies to encourage sustainable consumption.” Final report prepared by BIO Intelligence Service for European Commission (DG ENV).Google Scholar
  15. Staddon, S. C., Cycil, C., Goulden, M., Leygue, C. and Spence, A., 2016. “Intervening to change behaviour and save energy in the workplace: A systematic review of available evidence.” Energy Research & Social Science 17, 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Steg, L. and Vlek, C., 2009. “Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steg, L., Perlaviciute G. and van der Werff, E., 2015. “Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition.” Frontiers in Psychology 6 (805).Google Scholar
  18. Stern, P. C., 1992. “Psychological Dimensions of Global Environmental Change.” Annual Review of Psychology 43, 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stern, N., 2006. “The Stern Review on the Economic Effects of Climate Change.” Population and Development Review 32, 793–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Trump, D., 2017. “Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord.” The White House, 01 June 2017,
  21. Umpfenbach, K., 2014. “Influences on consumer behaviour. Policy implications beyond nudging.” Berlin: Ecologic Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Van der Linden, S., 2015. “The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 41, 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Udalov
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of WuppertalWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations