Abstract
An increasing number of product variants and a decrease in demand certainty challenge manufacturing companies. Lean, flow-oriented production lines are best-practice to assure efficient production in a predictable environment. However, with the increase in complexity and uncertainty, more flexible production systems such as matrix production currently receive much attention. Having neither a common takt time nor a rigid linkage, they offer new degrees of freedom regarding process order and machine choice. This paper contributes to answering the question under which conditions a matrix production is favourable compared to a production line. To answer this question, the effects of MTTF and MTTR as driving factor to choose a matrix production over a production line are analysed. Regarding the material flow in the matrix, the benefits of routing flexibility and operation flexibility concerning throughput time, tardiness and output of the matrix production are evaluated. The results show that a rule based approach has its limits especially regarding the exploitation of operation flexibility. For low levels of routing flexibility, the rule based approach tends to generate sup-optimal solutions due to a lack of coordination between the agents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Greschke, P.I.: Matrix-Produktion als Konzept einer taktunabhängigen Fließfertigung, Vulkan Verlag (2016)
Jesse, T.: Herausforderungen und Konzepte für die Großserien-Kraftfahrzeugendmontage der Zukunft (2017)
Echsler Minguillon, F., Lanza, G.: Maschinelles Lernen in der PPS. In: Wt Werkstatttechnik Online, vol. 107, pp. 630–634 (2017)
Browne, J., Dubois, D., Rathmill, K., Sethi, S.P., Stecke, K.E.: Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag. 2, 114–117 (1984)
Caprihan, R., Wadhwa, S.: Impact of routing flexibility on the performance of an FMS—a simulation study. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 9, 273–298 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007917429815
Scholz-Reiter, B., de Beer, C., Bose, F., Windt, K.: Evolution in der Logistik Selbststeuerung logistischer Prozesse. In: VDI BERICHTE, vol. 1978, p. 179 (2007)
Mahmoodi, F., Mosier, C.T., Morgan, J.R.: The effects of scheduling rules and routing flexibility on the performance of a random flexible manufacturing system. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 11, 271–289 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008165212489
Chan, F.T.S.: Impact of operation flexibility and dispatching rules on the performance of a flexible manufacturing system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 24, 447–459 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1594-1
Joseph, O.A., Sridharan, R.: Effects of routing flexibility, sequencing flexibility and scheduling decision rules on the performance of a flexible manufacturing system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 56, 291–306 (2011)
Sharma, P., Jain, A.: Effect of routing flexibility and sequencing rules on performance of stochastic flexible job shop manufacturing system with setup times: simulation approach (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415576060
Lu, C.-L., Chiu, S.-Y., Wu, J., Chao, L.-P.: Dynamic Monte-Carlo tree search algorithm for multi-objective flexible job-shop scheduling problem. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 10, 1531–1539 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/100431
Scholz-Reiter, B., de Beer, C., Peters, K.: Autonomous control of shop floor logistics. Manuf. Model. Manag. Control 2004, 47 (2006)
Stricker, N., Kuhnle, A., Sturm, R., Friess, S.: Reinforcement learning for adaptive order dispatching in the semiconductor industry. CIRP Ann. (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hofmann, C., Brakemeier, N., Krahe, C., Stricker, N., Lanza, G. (2019). The Impact of Routing and Operation Flexibility on the Performance of Matrix Production Compared to a Production Line. In: Schmitt, R., Schuh, G. (eds) Advances in Production Research. WGP 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03451-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03451-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03450-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03451-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)