Skip to main content

“Pragmatic Adaptation” and the Future of the City of London: Between Globalisation and Brexit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The economic, political and social domination of the City of London over any other British socio-economic actors has traditionally been at the core of the debate about “British exceptionalism. In particular, the enduring hegemony of the City of London in the history of British capitalism cannot be separated from its peculiar ties with the Treasury and the Bank of England , often considered at the roots of its “pragmatic adaptation”. This contribution will explore how this “pragmatic adaptation”, relying on the friendly regulatory and economic policies enacted by the British government, will help the City of London adapt to the challenges of globalisation and the changing nature of British relations with the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here it is important to point out that in a Gramscian sociology of power an economic actor can become hegemonic for two reasons: (1) economic power legitimates and renders its dominant position acceptable to the other actors; (2) only an economic actor can trigger that economic development which is considered the prerequisite to gain mass consensus (Gill 1993).

  2. 2.

    As he does not explain the persistent success of the City , here it is necessary to rely on Ingham (1984).

  3. 3.

    See also Anderson’s interpretation of the failures of Labour governments (Anderson 1987).

  4. 4.

    Short-selling is selling borrowed shares in the hopes that their price will fall and that they can be bought back at a profit later on.

  5. 5.

    The Heckscher-Ohlin trade model concludes that a country will tend to export goods intensive in the factor it has in abundance, and to import goods intensive in the factors in which it is scarce (Frieden and Rogowski 1996: 37).

  6. 6.

    The Stolper-Samuelson theorem finds that in each country returns rise absolutely and disproportionally to owners of factors that are required intensively in the production of goods whose prices have risen; and they fall absolutely and disproportionally to factors required intensively in the production of goods whose prices have fallen (Frieden and Rogowski 1996: 37).

References

  • Aaronvitch, S. (1961). The Ruling Class. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1987, January–February). The Figures of Descent. New Left Review, 161, 20–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2017, July 31). Brexit: UK Will Not Cut Taxes, Says Philip Hammond. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-40771900. Accessed August 1, 2017.

  • Busch, A. (2008). Banking Regulation and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, P. J., & Hopkins, A. G. (2000). Gentlemanly Capitalism and Economic Policy: City, Government and the “National interest”, 1850–1914. In C. Michie (Ed.), The Development of London as a Financial Centre (Vol. 2, pp. 319–356). London and New York: I.B.Tauris Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. (1995). Globalization and the Changing Logic of Collective Action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of London. (2016). How We Make Decisions. Available at: https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/about-the-city/how-we-make-decisions/Documents/implementing-markets-union.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2016.

  • CityUK. (2017, July 6). A Vision for a Transformed, World-Leading Industry. Available at: https://www.thecityuk.com/research/a-vision-for-a-transformed-world-leading-industry/. Accessed August 1, 2017.

  • Cohen, B. J. (1996). Phoenix Risen: The Resurrection of Global Finance. World Politics, 48(2), 268–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. J. (2001). Electronic Money: New Day or False Dawn? Review of International Political Economy, 8(2), 197–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. D. (1996). Financial Services, Globalization and Domestic Policy Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (1999). Global Shift, Transforming the World Economy. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (2003). Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2016, December 9). Brexit: The United-Kingdom and EU Financial Services. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/587384/IPOL_BRI%282016%29587384_EN.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2017.

  • Financial Times. (2017, July 5). EU Hopes of Winning London’s Euro Trading Sunk by Undersea Cables. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/56ad41e6-617a-11e7-8814-0ac7eb84e5f1. Accessed July 26, 2017.

  • Frieden, J. (1991). Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance. International Organization, 45(4), 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1993). The Dynamics of International Monetary Systems: International and Domestic Factors in the Rise, Reign, and Demise of the Classical Gold Standard. In J. Snyder & R. Jervis (Eds.), Coping with Complexity in the International System. Westview: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1994a). Exchange Rate Politics: Contemporary Lessons from American History. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1) (Spring).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1994b). International Investment and Colonial Control: A New Interpretation. International Organization, 48(4) (Autumn).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1996a). Economic Integration and the Politics of Monetary Policy in the United States. In R. O. Keohane & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1996b). The Impact of Goods and Capital Market Integration on European Monetary Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1997a). Monetary Populism in Nineteenth-Century America: An Open Economy Interpretation. Journal of Economic History, 57(2), 367–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1997b). The Politics of Exchange Rates. In S. Edwards & M. Naim (Eds.), Mexico, 1994: Anatomy of an Emerging Market Crash. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1998a, September). The Euro: Who Wins? Who Loses?. Foreign Policy, 112, 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1998b). The New Political Economy of EMU. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (1999). Actors and Preferences in International Relations. In D. A. Lake & R. Powell (Eds.), Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (2000). The Political Economy of the Euro as an International Currency. In R. Mundell & A. Clesse (Eds.), The Euro as a Stabilizer in the International Economic System. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (2001). Making Commitments: France and Italy in the European Monetary System, 1979–1985. In B. Eichengreen & J. Frieden (Eds.), The Political Economy of European Monetary Integration. Westview: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (2002). Real Sources of European Currency Policy: Sectoral Interests and European Monetary Integration. International Organization, 56(4), 831–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (2004). One Europe, One Vote? The Political Economy of European Union Representation in International Organizations. European Union Politics, 5(2), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. (2009, March). Global Governance of Global Monetary Relations: Rationale and Feasibility. Economics E-Journal, 3, 2009-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J., & Rogowski, R. (1996). The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview. In R. O. Keohane & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Internationalization and Domestic Politics (pp. 25–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J., & Stein, E. (2001). The Political Economy of Exchange Rate Policy in Latin America: An Analytical Overview. In J. Frieden & E. Stein (Eds.), The Currency Game: Exchange Rate Politics in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J., Leblang, D., & Valev, N. (2010). The Political Economy of Exchange Rate Regimes in Transition Economies. Review of International Organizations, 5(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (1993). Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (1993). Ideas in Foreign Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, M. A. (1994). Speculative Behavior and the Operation of Competitive Markets Under Uncertainty. Aldershot: Avebury Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., & Marsh, D. (2000). Demystifying Globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2000). The Global Transformations Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global Transformation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1999). Globalization in Question (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, H. H., & Sørensen, G. (1995). Whose World Order? Uneven Globalization and the End of the Cold War. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, G. (1984). Capitalism Divided. Hampshire: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, G. (1988, November–December). Commercial Capital and British Development: A Reply to Michael Barratt Brown. New Left Review, I/172, 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, G. (2002, March–April). Shock Therapy in the City. New Left Review, 14, 152–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1977). Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Milner, H. V. (Eds.). (1996). Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kynaston, D. (1994). The City of London. A World of its Own, Vol. I and II. London, Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, P. (2000). Dirty Dealing: The Untold Truth About Global Money Laundering. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstreth, F. (1979). The City, Industry and the State. In C. Crouch (Ed.), State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism (pp. 157–191). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (1993). International and Domestic Institutions in the EMU Process. In Economics and Politics, 5(2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittleman, J. H. (2000). The Globalization Syndrome: Transformation and Resistance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, T. (1977, February–April). The Twilight of the British State. New Left Review, 101–102, 3–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M., & Taylor, A. M. (2004). Global Capital Markets. Integration, Crisis and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, H. (1980). Finance Capital and the Crisis in Britain. Capital and Class, 11(Summer), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, H. (2000). Globalisation, Sovereignty and Transnational Regulation: Reshaping the Governance of International Migration. In B. Gosh (Ed.), Managing Migration: Time for a New International Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoa-Schioppa, T. (1994). The Road to Monetary Union in Europe: The Emperor, the Kings and the Genies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogowski, R. (1989). Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. (2017, July 26). Exclusive: Banks Dealing EU Sovereign Debt May Be Dragged Out of London. Available at: http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-primary-dealers-idUKKBN1AB10U. Accessed July 26, 2017.

  • Strange, S. (1971). Sterling and British Policy. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1998). Mad Money. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talani, L. S. (2010). The Global Crash. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Talani, L. S. (2012). Globalization, Hegemony and the Future of the City of London. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Finanser blog. (2017, July). FinTech: $6.5 Billion Invested in First Half of 2017. Available at: https://thefinanser.com/2017/07/fintech-6-5-billion-invested-first-half-2017.html/. Accessed August 1, 2017.

  • The Guardian. (2017a, September 6). Stupid or Duplicitous, This ‘Leak’ Tells EU Nationals Their Status in Britain Is Perilous. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/06/leak-eu-nationals-status-britain-brexit. Accessed September 11, 2017.

  • The Guardian. (2017b, September 5). The Brexit Bill Is Cataclysmic. Only a Swerve Will Save Us. Polly Toynbee. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/05/brexit-bill-government-negotiations-labour. Accessed September 11, 2017.

  • The Independent. (2017a, July 6). Brexit: Deutsche Bank Said to Be Switching from London to Frankfurt. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/brexit-latest-news-deutsche-bank-london-frankfurt-uk-leave-eu-switch-a7826361.html. Accessed July 26, 2017.

  • The Independent. (2017b, July 17). Surviving Hard Brexit Will Require Sacrifices Not Seen Since the Second World War. Sean O’Grady. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-david-davis-free-trade-migration-labour-laws-low-taxes-a7845421.html. Accessed August 1, 2017.

  • The Irish Times. (2017, June 30). Brexit: A Dozen London Firms, Banks Moving to Dublin, IDA Says. Available at: https://www.irishtimes.com/business/financial-services/brexit-a-dozen-london-firms-banks-moving-to-dublin-ida-says-1.3138874?mode=amp. Accessed July 26, 2017.

  • The Telegraph. (2008, September 17). Protect Bank Shares from Short-Selling, Ministers Told. James Kirkup. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2977387/Protect-bank-shares-from-short-selling-ministers-told.html. Accessed June 28 2010.

  • Thompson, G. (1993). The Economic Emergence of a New Europe? Broadheath: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leila Simona Talani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Talani, L.S. (2019). “Pragmatic Adaptation” and the Future of the City of London: Between Globalisation and Brexit. In: Hay, C., Bailey, D. (eds) Diverging Capitalisms. Building a Sustainable Political Economy: SPERI Research & Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03415-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics