Abstract
Germany has embarked on an ambitious project to transform its energy system until 2050—the so-called Energiewende. Some critics contend that the Energiewende imposes unnecessary and avoidable welfare losses due to a lack of integration within the EU. In contrast, these critiques largely miss the point because the asserted lack of integration cannot be pinned on the Energiewende and the welfare consequences of EU-wide integration are less clear than the critiques imply.
A previous version of this chapter has first been published as (reprinted with permission): Strunz, S., Gawel, E., and P. Lehmann (2014). On the alleged need to strictly “Europeanize” the German Energiewende. Intereconomics 2014(5): 244–250.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Without uncertainty about marginal costs and benefits, both approaches are theoretically equal because the regulator can either set a quantity target or implement an equivalent price instrument.
- 2.
Ensuring grid stability by putting a portfolio of complementary RES in place is another reason why technology-specific quotas would be preferable (e. g., a combination of wind and solar is more robust to meteorological fluctuations than each of the technologies by itself).
References
Acatech (Ed.). (2015). Die Energiewende europäisch integrieren. Neue Gestalstungsmöglichkeiten für die gemeinsame Energie- und Klimapolitik. Berlin: Acatech.
Bigerna, S., Bollino, C. A., & Micheli, S. (2016). Renewable energy scenarios for cost reductions in the European Union. Renewable Energy, 96, 80–90.
Buchan, D., & Keay, M. (2016). Europe’s long energy journey: Towards an Energy Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
EU Commission. (2014). Communication from the commission. Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy 2014–2020. Official Journal of the European Union (2014/C 200/01).
Frondel, M., Schmidt, C., & Aus Dem Moore, N. (2013). Marktwirtschaftliche Energiewende: Ein Wettbewerbsrahmen für die Stromversorgung mit alternativen Technologien. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 37(1), 27–41.
Gawel, E., & Purkus, A. (2012). Promoting market and system integration of renewable energies through premium schemes—A case study of the German market premium. Energy Policy, 61, 599–609.
Gawel, E., & Strunz, S. (2014). State aid dispute on Germany’s support for renewables: Is the commission on the right course? Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 11(2), 139–152.
Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2014). Wieviel Europa braucht die Energiewende? Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 38(3), 163–182.
Grams, C., Beerli, R., Pfenninger, S., Staffell, I., & Wernli, H. (2017). Balancing Europe’s wind-power output through spatial deployment informed by weather regimes. Nature Climate Change, 7, 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE3338.
Gullberg, A.-T. (2012). The political feasibility of Norway as the “green battery” of Europe. Energy Policy, 57, 615–623.
Haucap, J., & Kühling, J. (2012). Zeit für eine grundlegende Reform der EEG-Förderung – das Quotenmodell. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 63(3), 41–49.
Hübner, M., Schmidt, C., & Weigert, B. (2012). Energiepolitik: Erfolgreiche Energiewende nur im europäischen Kontext. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 13(4), 286–307.
Jacobs, D. (2012). Renewable energy policy convergence in the EU: The evolution of feed-in tariffs in Germany, Spain and France. London: Ashgate.
Kitzing, L., Mitchell, C., & Mothorst, P. (2012). Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging? Energy Policy, 51, 192–201.
Macilwain, C. (2012). Supergrid: Is a vast undersea grid bringing wind-generated electricity from the North Sea to Europe a feasible proposition or an overpriced fantasy? Nature, 468, 624–625.
Monopolies Commission. (2017). Energie 2017: Gezielt vorgehen, Stückwerk vermeiden. Sondergutachten 77, Bonn.
Mundt, A. (2013). Die Energiewende braucht Marktvertrauen. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Recht der Energiewirtschaft, 2(6), 241–242.
Sinn, H.-W. (2012). Zu viele unrealistische Hoffnungen und zu wenig Pragmatismus. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 62(1/2), 54–56.
Sinn, H.-W. (2017). Buffering volatility. A study on the limits of Germany’s energy revolution. European Economic Review, 99, 130–150.
Söderholm, P. (2008). Harmonization of renewable feed-in laws: A comment. Energy Policy, 36, 946–953.
Strunz, S., Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2015). Towards a general “Europeanization” of EU Member States’ energy policies? Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 4(2), 143–159.
Unteutsch, M., & Lindenberger, D. (2014). Promotion of electricity from renewable energy in Europe post 2020 – The economic benefits of cooperation. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 38(1), 47–64.
Weimann, J. (2012). Atomausstieg und Energiewende: Wie sinnvoll ist der deutsche Alleingang? Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 62(12), 34–38.
Weimann, J. (2013). Rettet die Energiewende? Warum eigentlich? Wirtschaftsdienst, 93(11), 793–795.
Weitzman, M. L. (1974). Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies, 41(4), 477–491.
Wirth, H. (2014). Recent facts about photovoltaics in Germany (p. 8ff). http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/publications/veroeffentlichungen-pdf-dateien-en/studien-und-konzeptpapiere/recent-facts-about-photovoltaics-in-germany.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strunz, S., Gawel, E., Lehmann, P. (2019). On the Alleged Need to Strictly “Europeanize” the German Energiewende. In: Gawel, E., Strunz, S., Lehmann, P., Purkus, A. (eds) The European Dimension of Germany’s Energy Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03374-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03374-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03373-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03374-3
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)