Skip to main content

On the Alleged Need to Strictly “Europeanize” the German Energiewende

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Dimension of Germany’s Energy Transition

Abstract

Germany has embarked on an ambitious project to transform its energy system until 2050—the so-called Energiewende. Some critics contend that the Energiewende imposes unnecessary and avoidable welfare losses due to a lack of integration within the EU. In contrast, these critiques largely miss the point because the asserted lack of integration cannot be pinned on the Energiewende and the welfare consequences of EU-wide integration are less clear than the critiques imply.

A previous version of this chapter has first been published as (reprinted with permission): Strunz, S., Gawel, E., and P. Lehmann (2014). On the alleged need to strictly “Europeanize” the German Energiewende. Intereconomics 2014(5): 244–250.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Without uncertainty about marginal costs and benefits, both approaches are theoretically equal because the regulator can either set a quantity target or implement an equivalent price instrument.

  2. 2.

    Ensuring grid stability by putting a portfolio of complementary RES in place is another reason why technology-specific quotas would be preferable (e. g., a combination of wind and solar is more robust to meteorological fluctuations than each of the technologies by itself).

References

  • Acatech (Ed.). (2015). Die Energiewende europäisch integrieren. Neue Gestalstungsmöglichkeiten für die gemeinsame Energie- und Klimapolitik. Berlin: Acatech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigerna, S., Bollino, C. A., & Micheli, S. (2016). Renewable energy scenarios for cost reductions in the European Union. Renewable Energy, 96, 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, D., & Keay, M. (2016). Europe’s long energy journey: Towards an Energy Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission. (2014). Communication from the commission. Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy 2014–2020. Official Journal of the European Union (2014/C 200/01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frondel, M., Schmidt, C., & Aus Dem Moore, N. (2013). Marktwirtschaftliche Energiewende: Ein Wettbewerbsrahmen für die Stromversorgung mit alternativen Technologien. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 37(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawel, E., & Purkus, A. (2012). Promoting market and system integration of renewable energies through premium schemes—A case study of the German market premium. Energy Policy, 61, 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawel, E., & Strunz, S. (2014). State aid dispute on Germany’s support for renewables: Is the commission on the right course? Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 11(2), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2014). Wieviel Europa braucht die Energiewende? Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 38(3), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grams, C., Beerli, R., Pfenninger, S., Staffell, I., & Wernli, H. (2017). Balancing Europe’s wind-power output through spatial deployment informed by weather regimes. Nature Climate Change, 7, 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE3338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg, A.-T. (2012). The political feasibility of Norway as the “green battery” of Europe. Energy Policy, 57, 615–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haucap, J., & Kühling, J. (2012). Zeit für eine grundlegende Reform der EEG-Förderung – das Quotenmodell. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 63(3), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, M., Schmidt, C., & Weigert, B. (2012). Energiepolitik: Erfolgreiche Energiewende nur im europäischen Kontext. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 13(4), 286–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. (2012). Renewable energy policy convergence in the EU: The evolution of feed-in tariffs in Germany, Spain and France. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzing, L., Mitchell, C., & Mothorst, P. (2012). Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging? Energy Policy, 51, 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macilwain, C. (2012). Supergrid: Is a vast undersea grid bringing wind-generated electricity from the North Sea to Europe a feasible proposition or an overpriced fantasy? Nature, 468, 624–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monopolies Commission. (2017). Energie 2017: Gezielt vorgehen, Stückwerk vermeiden. Sondergutachten 77, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundt, A. (2013). Die Energiewende braucht Marktvertrauen. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Recht der Energiewirtschaft, 2(6), 241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (2012). Zu viele unrealistische Hoffnungen und zu wenig Pragmatismus. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 62(1/2), 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (2017). Buffering volatility. A study on the limits of Germany’s energy revolution. European Economic Review, 99, 130–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderholm, P. (2008). Harmonization of renewable feed-in laws: A comment. Energy Policy, 36, 946–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strunz, S., Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2015). Towards a general “Europeanization” of EU Member States’ energy policies? Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 4(2), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unteutsch, M., & Lindenberger, D. (2014). Promotion of electricity from renewable energy in Europe post 2020 – The economic benefits of cooperation. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 38(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, J. (2012). Atomausstieg und Energiewende: Wie sinnvoll ist der deutsche Alleingang? Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 62(12), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, J. (2013). Rettet die Energiewende? Warum eigentlich? Wirtschaftsdienst, 93(11), 793–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1974). Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies, 41(4), 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, H. (2014). Recent facts about photovoltaics in Germany (p. 8ff). http://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/publications/veroeffentlichungen-pdf-dateien-en/studien-und-konzeptpapiere/recent-facts-about-photovoltaics-in-germany.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Strunz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Strunz, S., Gawel, E., Lehmann, P. (2019). On the Alleged Need to Strictly “Europeanize” the German Energiewende. In: Gawel, E., Strunz, S., Lehmann, P., Purkus, A. (eds) The European Dimension of Germany’s Energy Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03374-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03374-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03373-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03374-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics