Skip to main content

Grey Number Based Methodology for Non-homogeneous Preference Elicitation in Fuzzy Risk Analysis Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applying Fuzzy Logic for the Digital Economy and Society

Abstract

Risk analysis plays a crucial role in mitigating the levels of harm of a risk. In real world scenarios, it is a big challenge for risk analysts to make a proper and comprehensive decision when coping with the risks. Many practical risk analysis problems do not have flexibility with regards to knowledge elicitation and disagreements in the group. This is due to the non-homogeneous nature of risk analysts’ preferences that lead to inconsistent agreements in the process of group decision making. In this chapter, a novel non-homogeneous preference elicitation based on grey numbers for risk analysis problem is proposed. Grey numbers allow more flexibility for non-homogeneous preference elicitation in uncertain, vague and fuzzy environment. This work also introduces a novel theoretical non-homogeneous consensus reaching methodology that resolves disagreement between risk analysts. A case study on risk analysis decision making is also presented to demonstrate the novelty, validity and feasibility of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deng, J. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. Journal of Grey Systems, 1(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lin, Y., Chen, M., & Liu, S. (2004). Theory of grey systems: Capturing uncertainties of grey information. Kybernetes: The International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics, 33, 196–218.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, S., Gao, T., & Dang, Y. (2000). Grey systems theory and its applications. Beijing: The Science Press of China.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (2006). Grey information theory and practical applications. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Komorowski, J., Pawlak, J. Z., Polkowski, L., & Skowron, A. (1999). Rough sets: A tutorial. In S. K. Pal & A. Skowron (Eds.), Rough fuzzy hybridization: A new trend in decision-making. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yamaguchi, D., Li, G.-D., & Nagai, M. (2007). A grey-based rough approximation model for interval data processing. Information Sciences, 177, 4727–4744.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, Q., & Liu, Z. (2009). Real formal concept analysis based on grey-rough set theory. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22, 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deng, J. (1982). The control problems of grey systems. Systems and Control Letters, 1(5), 288–294.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, Y., & John, R. (2012). Grey sets and greyness. Information Sciences, 185(1), 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pham, V. N., Ngo, L. T., & Pedrycz, W. (2016). Interval-valued fuzzy set approach to fuzzy co-clustering for data classification. Knowledge-Based Systems, 107, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Navara, M., & Navarová, M. (2017). Principles of inclusion and exclusion for interval-valued fuzzy sets and IF-sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 324, 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8, 199–249.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1995). A review of human linguistic probability processing: General principles and empirical evidence. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(1), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yaakob, A. M., Serguieva, A., & Gegov, A. (2015). FN-TOPSIS: Fuzzy network for ranking traded equities. IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, 25(2), 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deschrijver, G., & Kerre, E. (2003). On the relationship between some extensions of fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 133(2), 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haq, N., & Kannan, G. (2007). A hybrid normalised multi criteria decision making for the vendor selection in a supply chain model. International Journal Management and Decision Making, 8(5/6), 601–622.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, Y. H., & Lee, P. C. (2007). Novel high-precision grey forecasting model. Automation in Construction, 16(6), 771–777.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, S. J., Chiu, N. H., & Chen, L.W. (2008). Integration of the grey relational analysis with genetic algorithm for software effort estimation. European Journal of Operational Research, 188(3), 898–909.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, Y. H., Lee, P. C., Chang, T. P., & Ting, H. I. (2008). Multi-attribute group decision making model under the condition of uncertain information. Automation in Construction, 17(6), 792–797.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitiene, J. (2009). Multi-attribute decision making model by applying grey numbers. Informatica, 20(2), 305–320.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Laarhoven, P. J., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1–3), 199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, L., & Wei, L. L. (2010). An improved method for ranking fuzzy numbers based on centroid. In Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Yantai, Shandong (pp. 442–446).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lin, J. G., Zhuang, Q. Y., & Huang, C. (2012). Fuzzy statistical analysis of multiple regression with crisp and fuzzy covariates and applications in analyzing economic. Data of China Computational Economic, 39, 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bakar, A. S. A., & Gegov, A. (2014). Ranking of fuzzy numbers based on centroid point and spread. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy System, 27(3), 1179–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bakar, A. S. A., & Gegov, A. (2015). Multi-layer decision making methodology for ranking Z-numbers. International Journal of Computational Intelligent Systems, 8(2), 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chutia, R. (2017). Ranking of fuzzy numbers by using value and angle in the epsilon-deviation degree method. Applied Soft Computing, 60, 706–721.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Alfonso, G., de Hierro, A. R. L., & Roldán, C. (2017). A fuzzy regression model based on finite fuzzy numbers and its application to real-world financial data. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 318, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aguilar-Peña, C., De Hierro, A. F. R. L., De Hierro, C. R. L., & Martínez-Moreno, J. (2016). A family of fuzzy distance measures of fuzzy numbers. Soft Computing, 20(1), 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, X., Zhu, J., Song, Y., & Lei, L. (2016). Combination of unreliable evidence sources in intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM framework. Knowledge-Based Systems, 97, 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bongo, M. F., & Ocampo, L. A. (2017). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for mitigating airport congestion: A case in Ninoy Aquino International Airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 63, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2018). A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 18(1), 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shieh, B. S. (2007). An approach to centroids of fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9, 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, X., & Kerre, E. E. (2001). Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (I). Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 375–385.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, X., & Kerre, E. E. (2001). Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (II). Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Syafadhli Abu Bakar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bakar, A.S.A., Khalif, K.M.N.K., Yaakob, A.M., Gegov, A., Amin, A.Z.M. (2019). Grey Number Based Methodology for Non-homogeneous Preference Elicitation in Fuzzy Risk Analysis Management. In: Meier, A., Portmann, E., Terán, L. (eds) Applying Fuzzy Logic for the Digital Economy and Society. Fuzzy Management Methods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03368-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics