Advertisement

Computation Time Efficient Stiffness Analysis of the Modified R-CUBE Mechanism

  • İ. GörgülüEmail author
  • M. İ. C. Dede
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 68)

Abstract

Parallel manipulators are known to be more stiff than the serial manipulators. However, modeling the stiffness for parallel manipulators are difficult compared to serial manipulators due to the constrained structure and passive joints. In addition, computation of the stiffness model for parallel manipulators are exhausting since it requires an iterative solution algorithm due requirement of force-position convergence of all serial chains connecting to the same mobile platform. Direct solutions are faster however, they lack in accuracy. In this study, direct solution is preferred for real-time application and analytic stiffness model of the modified R-CUBE mechanism is obtained by using Virtual Joint Method (VJM). The finite element (FE) model is constructed and simulated to validate the analytical model. Then, a combination of external wrenches \(\pm 5\) N in various directions are applied on the mobile platform in both FE and VJM in some critical poses. Finally, the computed numerical results are listed and compared along with their computation times.

Keywords

Stiffness Parallel manipulator Virtual joint method Finite element analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey via grant number 117M405.

References

  1. 1.
    Connor, J.J.: Analysis of Structural Member Systems. Ronald Press Co., New York (1976)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gosselin, C.: Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 6(3), 377–382 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kern, T.A.: Engineering Haptic Devices: A Beginner’s Guide for Engineers. Springer (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, W., Gao, F., Zhang, J.: R-CUBE, a decoupled parallel manipulator only with revolute joints. Mech. Mach. Theory 40(4), 467–473 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McGuire, W., Gallagher, R.H., Ziemian, R.D.: Matrix structural analysis (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pashkevich, A., Klimchik, A., Chablat, D.: Enhanced stiffness modeling of manipulators with passive joints. Mech. Mach. Theory 46(5), 662–679 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salisbury, J.K., Craig, J.J.: Articulated hands: force control and kinematic issues. Int. J. Robot. Res. 1(1), 4–17 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, G., Bai, S., Kepler, J.: Mobile platform center shift in spherical parallel manipulators with flexible limbs. Mech. Mach. Theory 75, 12–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Izmir Institute of TechnologyIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations