Skip to main content

Norway as a Battery for the Future European Power System – Comparison of Two Different Methodological Approaches

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

This paper compares the simulation results for two stochastic optimization power market models. EMPS uses aggregation and heuristics to calculate the optimal dispatch. SOVN simulates the operation of the power system in one large linear programming problem taking each single plant and reservoir into consideration. The comparison is for a future system in Europe where wind and solar power production supplies 61% of the annual demand. Three different alternatives for the Norwegian hydropower system is studied: present generation capacity (about 30 GW), increased capacity to about 41 GW and further to about 49 GW. The analyses show that SOVN to a larger degree than EMPS manage to increase production in high price periods and pump in low price periods. This particularly applies to the weeks before the change from the depletion (winter) to the filling (summer) period. This better ability to exploit the flexibility of the hydropower system is due to applying a formal optimization in SOVN compared to advanced heuristics in EMPS. For regions without pumping possibility, there is less difference between the models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Graabak, I., Korpaas, M., Jaehnert, S., Belsnes, M.: Balancing future variable wind and solar power production in Northern Europe with Norwegian hydro power (2017, submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Helseth, A., Mo, B., Henden, A., Warland, G.: Detailed long-term hydro-thermal scheduling for expansion planning in the Nordic power system. IET Res. J. (2017). ISSN 1751-8644

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wolfgang, O., Haugstad, A., Mo, B., Gjelsvik, A., Wangensteen, I., Doorman, G.: Hydro reservoir handling in Norway before and after deregulation. Energy 34, 1642–1651 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graabak, I., Jaehnert, S., Korpås, M., Mo, B.: Norway as a battery for the future european power system - impacts on the hydropower system. Energies 10, 2054 (2017). Special Issue. Hydropower 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruninx, K., et al.: D 2.1 Data sets of scenarios for 2050 (2015). http://www.e-highway2050.eu/results/. Accessed June 2017

  6. Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., et al.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Soc. 77, 437–470 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Svendsen, H.: Hourly wind and solar energy time series from Reanalysis dataset. SINTEF Energy Research. Project Memo 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2468143. Accessed June 2017

  8. Eurelectric: Hydropower for a sustainable Europe (2013). http://www.eurelectric.org/media/26690/hydro_report_final-2011-160-0011-01-e.pdf. Accessed June 2017

  9. Solvang, E., Harby, A., Killingtveit, Å.: Increased balancing power capacity in Norwegian hydroelectric power stations. SINTEF Energy Research, TR A7195 (2012). ISBN 9788259435194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingeborg Graabak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Graabak, I., Jaehnert, S., Korpås, M., Mo, B. (2019). Norway as a Battery for the Future European Power System – Comparison of Two Different Methodological Approaches. In: Helseth, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Hydro Scheduling in Competitive Electricity Markets. HSCM 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03311-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03311-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03310-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03311-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics