Advertisement

Humanitarian Aid 2.0: Social Media Analytics and Stakeholder Engagement at the International Committee of the Red Cross

  • Günter Müller-StewensEmail author
  • Tami Dinh
  • Bettina Hartmann
  • Martin J. Eppler
  • Fabienne Bünzli
Chapter
  • 273 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)

Abstract

Our case study in this chapter illustrates how technology like social media analytics has fundamentally changed the way that the ICRC engages with its stakeholders in humanitarian crises. Referring to the organization’s mission in one African context, the case highlights the role that social media analytics played in detecting an unexpected stakeholder constellation and in strengthening the ICRC’s presence as a protection provider. It shows what “managing stakeholders” means for an international humanitarian organization operating in an environment where influence is increasingly detached from traditional institutions and where powerful stakeholders can literally “pop up from anywhere” . The case also demonstrates the significance of social media analytics as a complementary decision-making tool to clarify stakeholder constellations and to successfully engage with key actors.

Keywords

International Committee Of The Red Cross (ICRC) Social Media Analysis Stakeholder Constellations Humanitarian Crisis Minor Stakeholders 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aggarwal, C. C. (2011). An introduction to social network data analytics. In C. C. Aggarwal (Ed.), social network data analytics (pp. 1–15). New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batrinca, B., & Treleaven, P. C. (2015). Social media analytics: A survey of techniques, tools and platforms. AI & SOCIETY, 30(1), 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blohm, I., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2013). Crowdsourcing: How to benefit from (too) many great ideas. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(4), 199–211.Google Scholar
  4. Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Fisher Liu, B., & Jin, Y. (2011). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooker, P., Barnett, J., & Cribbin, T. (2016). Doing social media analytics. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Khan, G. F. (2015). Social media for government. A practical guide to understanding, implementing, and managing social media tools in the public sphere. Singapore: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
  7. Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang, X. (2018). Visualization, technologies, or the public? Digital Journalism, 6(6), 737–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Günter Müller-Stewens
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tami Dinh
    • 2
  • Bettina Hartmann
    • 3
  • Martin J. Eppler
    • 4
  • Fabienne Bünzli
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of ManagementUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institute of Accounting, Control and AuditingUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  3. 3.University of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  4. 4.Institute for Media and Communications ManagementUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations