Abstract
In this chapter, the robust optimization approach (ROA), which is one of the most popular uncertainty modeling methods, is used to solve the power procurement problem of a large consumer under the power price uncertainty considering 30% variation in the price. In contrast to stochastic optimization, ROA is rather a deterministic and set-based method. In addition, the robust optimization method investigates the effect of an uncertain parameter on the optimal result, which aims to reduce the sensitivity of the optimal result to the uncertain parameter. To solve the problem, the standard MILP formulation of proposed model based on deterministic formulation is provided and solved under CLPX solver in GAMS optimization program. The comparing obtained results with the deterministic case show that by increasing the power price in the pool market, the large consumer seeks to procure its required demand using other sources as self-generating units, which makes the consumer robust against the price volatility of the market.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
H.A. Bagal, Y.N. Soltanabad, M. Dadjuo, K. Wakil, N. Ghadimi, Risk-assessment of photovoltaic-wind-battery-grid based large industrial consumer using information gap decision theory. Sol. Energy 169, 343–352 (2018)
N. Ghadimi, A new hybrid algorithm based on optimal fuzzy controller in multimachine power system. Complexity 21(1), 78–93 (2015)
D. Bertsimas, M. Sim, The price of robustness. Oper. Res. 52(1), 35–53 (2004)
D. Bertsimas, D.B. Brown, C. Caramanis, Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev. 53(3), 464–501 (2011)
S. Nojavan, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, K. Zare, Robust optimization based price-taker retailer bidding strategy under pool market price uncertainty. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 73, 955–963 (2015)
I. Ahmadian, O. Abedinia, N. Ghadimi, Fuzzy stochastic long-term model with consideration of uncertainties for deployment of distributed energy resources using interactive honey bee mating optimization. Front. Energy 8(4), 412–425 (2014)
Z. Haider, H. Charkhgard, C. Kwon, A robust optimization approach for solving problems in conservation planning. Ecol. Model. 368, 288–297 (2018)
A. Noruzi, T. Banki, O. Abedinia, N. Ghadimi, A new method for probabilistic assessments in power systems, combining Monte Carlo and stochastic-algebraic methods. Complexity 21(2), 100–110 (2015)
Y. Zhang, J. Tang, A robust optimization approach for itinerary planning with deadline. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 113, 56–74 (2018)
R.M. Lima, A.Q. Novais, A.J. Conejo, Weekly self-scheduling, forward contracting, and pool involvement for an electricity producer. An adaptive robust optimization approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240(2), 457–475 (2015)
Z. Geng, A.J. Conejo, Q. Chen, C. Kang, Power generation scheduling considering stochastic emission limits. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 95, 374–383 (2018)
S. Nojavan, H. Allah Aalami, Stochastic energy procurement of large electricity consumer considering photovoltaic, wind-turbine, micro-turbines, energy storage system in the presence of demand response program. Energy Convers. Manag. 103, 1008–1018 (2015)
N. Sayyad, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, K. Zare, Optimal bidding strategy of electricity retailers using robust optimisation approach considering time-of-use rate demand response programs under market price uncertainties. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 9(4), 328–338 (2015)
A.J. Conejo, M. Carrión, J.M. Morales, Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets, vol 153 (Springer, Boston, 2010)
A. Najafi-Ghalelou, S. Nojavan, K. Zare, Heating and power hub models for robust performance of smart building using information gap decision theory. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 98, 23–35 (2018)
R. Wang, P. Wang, G. Xiao, A robust optimization approach for energy generation scheduling in microgrids. Energy Convers. Manag. 106, 597–607 (2015)
Y. Zhang, N. Gatsis, G.B. Giannakis, Robust energy management for microgrids with high-penetration renewables. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 4(4), 944–953 (2013)
W. Wu, J. Chen, B. Zhang, H. Sun, A robust wind power optimization method for look-ahead power dispatch. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 5(2), 507–515 (2014)
E. Craparo, M. Karatas, D.I. Singham, A robust optimization approach to hybrid microgrid operation using ensemble weather forecasts. Appl. Energy 201, 135–147 (2017)
L. Baringo, A.J. Conejo, Offering strategy via robust optimization. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(3), 1418–1425 (2011)
M. Rahimiyan, L. Baringo, Strategic bidding for a virtual power plant in the day-ahead and real-time markets: a price-taker robust optimization approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(4), 2676–2687 (2016)
S. Nojavan, K. Zare, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Robust bidding and offering strategies of electricity retailer under multi-tariff pricing. Energy Econ. 68, 359–372 (2017)
R. Jiang, J. Wang, Y. Guan, Robust unit commitment with wind power and pumped storage hydro. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(2), 800–810 (2012)
P. Xiong, P. Jirutitijaroen, C. Singh, A distributionally robust optimization model for unit commitment considering uncertain wind power generation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32(1), 39–49 (2017)
A. Street, F. Oliveira, J.M. Arroyo, Contingency-constrained unit commitment with $n - K$ security criterion: a robust optimization approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(3), 1581–1590 (2011)
H. Ye, Y. Ge, M. Shahidehpour, Z. Li, Uncertainty marginal price, transmission reserve, and day-ahead market clearing with robust unit commitment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32(3), 1782–1795 (2017)
C. Wang, B. Jiao, L. Guo, Z. Tian, J. Niu, S. Li, Robust scheduling of building energy system under uncertainty. Appl. Energy 167, 366–376 (2016)
M. Mazidi, H. Monsef, P. Siano, Robust day-ahead scheduling of smart distribution networks considering demand response programs. Appl. Energy 178, 929–942 (2016)
R.A. Jabr, Robust transmission network expansion planning with uncertain renewable generation and loads. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(4), 4558–4567 (2013)
H. Yu, C.Y. Chung, K.P. Wong, Robust transmission network expansion planning method with Taguchi’s orthogonal array testing. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(3), 1573–1580 (2011)
CPLEX 12. [Online]. Available: https://www.gams.com/latest/docs/S_CPLEX.html. Accessed 15 Jul 2018
A. Brooke, D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, R. Raman, R.E. Rosenthal, GAMS A User’s Guide Introduction 1 (GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC, 1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mir, M., Ghadimi, N., Abedinia, O., Shokrani, S.A.R. (2019). Robust Optimization-Based Energy Procurement. In: Nojavan, S., Shafieezadeh, M., Ghadimi, N. (eds) Robust Energy Procurement of Large Electricity Consumers . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03229-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03229-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03228-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03229-6
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)