Skip to main content

Characteristics of Innovation Geography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geographies of Disruption

Abstract

Global geography and the organisation of human activities on earth are fundamentally managed by governments of different nations. Each sovereign country has their own legislations and interest governing economic activity within their boundaries. Governments have numerous roles in the economic activity. Conceptually ‘government’ refers here to a set of public sector organisations that are responsible for governing the specific areas and spatial scales. As an example, municipalities are interested on the local scale and activities that impact their specific vicinities where as regional or national governments or bodies are focusing on larger spatial scales. The nation state may be considered as the fundamental level of regulation as the states have the right to conduct taxation of its inhabitants. This is the reason why international economy is governed with trade and commercial treaties and is based on international agreements. This chapter elaborates the key characteristics of innovation geography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. (2003). E-Government and e-governance: Organisational implications, options and dilemmas. Public Policy and Administration, 18(2), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (2007). Global shift. Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (5th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., & Lloyd, P. F. (1990). Location in space. Theoretical perspectives in economic geography (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, R., Graya, A., & McComba, S. (2009). How responsive is e-government? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., Salomo, S., & Hölze, K. (2007). Role models for radical innovations in times of open innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkinen, T. (2010). Urban travel information and wireless technologies in Helsinki, Finland. Journal of Urban Technology, 17(2), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkinen, T., Merisalo, M., & Makkonen, T. (2018). Variations in the adoption and willingness to use e-services in three differentiated urban areas. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 950–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkinen, T., & Suorsa, K. (2010). Intermediaries in regional innovation systems: high-technology enterprise survey from Northern Finland. European Planning Studies, 18(2), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhiainen, J. S., & Suorsa, K. (2008). Triple helix in the periphery: The case of multipolis in northern Finland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(2), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, A. (2002). The internet on earth. A geography of information. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laranja, M. (2004). Innovation systems as regional policy frameworks: The case of Lisbon and Tagus Valley. Science and Public Policy, 31(4), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemet, G. (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38, 700–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2005). Do organizational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Groen, A. J., & Fischer, O. (2012). SME network characteristics versus product innovativeness: How to achieve high innovation performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Groen, A. J., Song, M., & Fischer, O. (2009). Successful patterns of internal SME characteristics leading to high overall innovation performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, M., & Traunmuller, R. (2000). Trends in electronic government: Managing distributed knowledge. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tan Yigitcanlar .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yigitcanlar, T., Inkinen, T. (2019). Characteristics of Innovation Geography. In: Geographies of Disruption. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03207-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03207-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03206-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03207-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics