Simmel Moves to a Different Neighbourhood
- 191 Downloads
This chapter discusses three cases of contemporary neighbouring initiatives: community housing and co-living; friendship-driven living choices (where people move into a neighbourhood in order to live near their friends); and neighbourhoods of common interest (e.g. gay neighbourhoods), along with the resistance to this. These cases all suggest the possibility that we can choose our neighbours as we choose our friends. The chapter also points out that friendship networks do not depend on location (neighbourhood), or even on obvious signs of common interests (e.g. sexual orientation). They tend to be more like personal communities, formed of personal attachments and interwoven connections across different settings, of which neighbourhood is only one, along with family, work and informal social groups of all kinds.
- Adams, R.G. (1998). The Demise of Territorial Determinism: Online Friendships. In R. Adams and G. Allan (1998). Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 153–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Altman, D. (1982). The Homosexualization of America. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1999). On the Way to a Post-Familial Family: From a Community of Need to Elective Affinities. Theory, Culture and Society, 15(3–4), 53–70.Google Scholar
- Berube, A. (2005). Mixed Communities in England: A US Perspective on Evidence and Policy Prospects. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
- Bulmer, M. (1986). Neighbours: The Work of Phillip Abrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Crouch, M. and McKenzie, H. 2006. The Logic of Small Samples in Interview-based Qualitative Research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499.Google Scholar
- Feld, S., and Carter, W.C. (1998). Foci of Activity as Changing Contexts of Friendship. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 136–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fernandez Arrigoitia, M. (2015). Islington Park Street Community: A Model for Alternative Housing in London. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C.S. (1976). The Urban Experience. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C.S., Merton, R.K., and Merton, Robert K. (1976). The Urban Experience. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Goff, C. (2005, 24 July). Britain’s First Purpose Built Commune. The Independent. Retrieved from: https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/britains-first-purpose-built-commune-301390.html.
- Ham, L. (2016, 26 October). Meet the Australians Living in ‘Intentional’ Communities. Domain.com. Retrieved from: https://www.domain.com.au/news/meet-the-australians-living-in-intentional-communities-20161024-gs98hg/.
- Kasperkevic, J. (2016, 20 March). Co-Living: The Companies Reinventing the Idea of Roommates. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/mar/20/co-living-companies-reinventing-roommates-open-door-common-.
- Kippax, S., Connell, R.W., Dowsett, G.W., and Crawford, J. (1993). Sustaining Safe Sex: Gay Communities Respond to AIDS. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Lein, L. (1983). The Ties That Bind: An Introduction. In L. Lein and M.B. Sussman (Eds.), The Ties that Bind: Men’s and Women’s Social Networks. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Living in the Future. (2014, 26 February). Murundaka Co-housing Community. Retrieved from: http://livinginthefuture.org/blog/murundaka-co-housing-community/.
- Moorhead, J. (2010, 1 May). It’s Like a Mini Centre Parcs! The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/may/01/cohousing-community-stroud.
- Moss, H. (1982, 30 May). Neighbors, Friends, Collaborators, Enemies. New York Times: Book Review. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/30/books/neighbors-friends-collaborators-enemies.html.
- O’Connor, P. (1992). Relationships Between Women. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
- Rawstorne, P., Holt, M., Kippax, S., Worth, H., Wilkinson, J., and Bittman, M. (2009). e-Male Survey 2008: Key Findings from a National Online Survey of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Australia. MONOGRAPH 3/2009 (pp. 1–54). Sydney: National Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
- Spencer, L., and Pahl, R. (2006). Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Tan, S. (2016, 23 March). Know Your Neighbours, Buy Cheaper Apartment: Co Housing Is the Next Big Thing. Financial Review. Retrieved from: http://www.afr.com/real-estate/know-your-neighbours-buy-cheaper-apartments-cohousing-is-the-next-big-thing-20160323-gnp79g.
- Wardill, J. (2017, 23 August). Leeds Housing Focus: Cohousing Time to Go European. Yorkshire Evening Post. Retrieved from: https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/leeds-housing-focus-what-is-cohousing-1-8727029.
- Wellman, B., Craven, P., Whitaker, M., Stevens, H., Shorter, A., DuToit, S., and Bakker, H. (1973). Community Ties and Support Systems: From Intimacy to Support. In L.S. Bourne, R.D. MacKinnon, and J.W. Simmons, The Form of Cities in Central Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto, Department of Geography Research Publications.Google Scholar
- Widdicombe, L. (2016, 20 May). Happy Together. The New Yorker. Retrieved from: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/05/16/the-rise-of-the-co-living-startup.
- Willmott, P. (1986). Neighbours, Social Networks, Informal Care and Public Policy. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar