Skip to main content

Critical Dietetics: Axiological Foundations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Dietetics and Critical Nutrition Studies

Part of the book series: Food Policy ((FP))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to firstly introduce the core values, theories, and methods of Critical Dietetics and, secondly, to discuss the implications of the core values and theories for critical dietetic praxis within traditional practice areas as well as through advocacy and activism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a discussion of definitions of social justice and health equity, see Brady, this volume.

  2. 2.

    For a more thorough discussion of epistemology and positivism within dietetics, see Gingras and Brady (2010).

  3. 3.

    Microaggression is a term coined by psychiatrist and Harvard professor Chester M. Pierce in 1970 to describe insults and dismissals he regularly witnessed non-black Americans inflict on African Americans (Wikipedia).

  4. 4.

    Note that we use scare quote around the term “obesity” to indicate our rejection of the term as an inherently medicalizing and discriminatory word.

References

  • Alkon AH, Agyemon J (eds) (2011) Cultivating food justice: race, class and sustainability. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Aphramor L, Gingras J (2009) That remains to be said: disappeared feminist discourses on fat in dietetic theory and practice. In: Rothblum ED, Solovay S (eds) Fat Studies Reader. New York University Press, New York, pp 97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Aphramor L, Gingras J (2011a) Helping people change: promoting politicised practice in the health care professions. In: Rich E, Monaghan LF, Aphramor L (eds) Debating obesity. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 192–218

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aphramor L, Gingras J (2011b) Reproducing inequalities: Theories and ethics in dietetics. In: Unnithan-Kumar M, Tremayne S (eds) Fatness and the maternal body: women’s experiences of corporeality and the shaping of social policy. Berghan Books, Oxford, pp 205–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin SB (1999) Fat, loathing and public health: the complicity of science in a culture of disordered eating. Cult Med Psychiatry 23(2):245–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biltekoff C (2013) Eating right in America: the cultural politics of food and health. Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brady J (2017) Trading the apron for the white lab coat: a contemporary history of dietetics in Canada, 1954 to 2016. Dissertation, Queen’s University

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady J, Milious V, Ventresca M (2016) Problematizing milk: considering production beyond the food system. In: Anderson CJ, Brady J, Levkoe CZ (eds) Conversations in food studies. University of Manitoba Press, Winnipeg

    Google Scholar 

  • Braveman B, Suarez-Balcazar Y (2009) Social justice and resource utilization in a community-based organization: a case illustration of the role of the occupational therapist. Am J Occup Ther 63(1):13–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler C, Tull ES, Chambers EC, Taylor J (2002) Internalized racism, body fat distribution, and abnormal fasting glucose among African-Caribbean women in Dominica, West Indies. J Natl Med Assoc 94(3):143–148

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Campos P, Saguy A, Ernsberger P, Oliver E, Gaesser G (2006) The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: public health crisis or moral panic? Int J Epidemiol 35(1):55–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad P (1975) The discovery of hyperkinesis: notes on the medicalization of deviant behaviour. Soc Probl 23(1):12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cram B (2013) University continuing education units: agents for social change? Can J Univ Contin Educ 31(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford R (1980) Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. Int J Health Serv 10(3):365–388. https://doi.org/10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw K (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan L Rev 43(6):1241–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault M (1995) Between science and food: nutrition professionals in the health-care hierarchy. In: Kronenfeld JJ (ed) Research in the sociology of health care. JAI Press, Inc, Greenwich, CT, pp 287–312

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault M (1999) Whose science of food and health? Narratives of profession and activism from public-health nutrition. In: Clarke AE, Olesen VL (eds) Revisioning women, health, and healing: feminist, cultural, and technoscience perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 166–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharamsi S, MacEntee MI (2002) Dentistry and distributive justice. Soc Sci Med 55(2):323–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimsdale JE, Pierce C, Schoenfeld D, Brown A, Zusman R, Graham R (1986) Suppressed anger and blood pressure: the effects of race, sex, social class, obesity, and age. Psychosom Med 48(6):430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis M (2002) Nature’s perfect food: how milk became America’s drink. NYU Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPuis M, Harrison JL, Goodman D (2011.) Just food?) In: Alkon AH, Agyeman J (eds) Cultivating food justice: race, class, and sustainability. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 283–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2003) The birth of the clinic. Taylor and Francis, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser K, Brady J (forthcoming) Exploring social justice advocacy in dietetic education: a content analysis. Can J Diet Pract Res

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (2012) Pedagogy of the oppressed, 30th edn. Bloomsberry Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingras J (2005) Evoking trust in the nutrition counselor: why should we be trusted? J Agric Environ Ethics 18(1):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingras J, Brady J (2010) To be other: relational consequences of dietitians feeding bodily difference. Rad Psychol 8(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingras J, Asada Y, Fox A, Coveney J, Berenbaum S, Aphramor L (2014) Critical dietetics: a discussion paper. J Crit Diet 2(1):2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gkiouleka A, Huijts T, Beckfield J, Bambra C (2018) Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: inequalities, intersectionality & institutions. Soc Sci Med 200:92–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock T (2017) Population health promotion in the anthropocene. In: Rootman I, Pederson A, Frohlich KL, Dupere S (eds) Health promotion in Canada: new perspectives on theory, practice, policy, and research. Canadian Scholars Press, Toronto, pp 408–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky O (2014) Intersectionality 101. The Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy. Available via http://vawforum-cwr.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/intersectionallity_101.pdf. 24 April 2018

  • Hankivsky O, Christofferson A (2008) Intersectionality and the determinants of health: a Canadian perspective. Crit Public Health 18(3):271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky O, Reid C, Cormier R, Varcoe C, Clark N, Benoit C, Brotman S (2010) Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women’s health research. Int J Equity Health 9(5):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks RG (2013) Social advocacy: a call for nursing action. Pastoral Psychol 62:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H, Braslow J, Rohrbaugh RM (2018) From cultural to structural competency: training psychiatry residents to act on social determinants of health and institutional racism. JAMA Psychiat 75(2):117–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LA, Liang B, Helms JE, Latta RE, Sparks E, Weintraub SR (2004) Training counseling psychologists as social justice agents: feminist and multicultural principles in action. Couns Psychol 32(6):793–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson N (1997) Teaching in the midst of belatedness: the paradox of natality in Hannah Arendt’s educational thought. Educ Theory 47(4):435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLellan D, Lordly D, Gingras J (2011) Professional socialization in dietetics: a review of the literature. Can J Diet Pract Res 72(1):37–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLellan D, Lordly D, Gingras J (2014) On beginning to become dietitians. J Crit Diet 2(1):13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • McGibbon EA (2012) People under threat: health outcomes and oppression. In: McGibbon EA (ed) Oppression: a social determinant of health. Fernwood Publishing, Halifax, NS

    Google Scholar 

  • McInturff K, Tulloch P (2014) Narrowing the Gap: The Difference that Public Sector Wages Make. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Available via https://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2014/10/Narrowing_the_Gap.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2018

  • Metzl JM, Hansen H (2014) Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med 103:126–133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkonen J, Raphael D (2010) Social determinants of health: The Canadian facts. Available via http://thecanadianfacts.org. Accessed 24 April 2018

  • Mosby I (2014) Food will win the war: the politics, culture, and science of food on Canada’s home front. UBC Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosby I (2012) Making and breaking Canada’s food rules: science, the state, and the government of nutrition. In: Iacovetta F, Korinek VJ, Epp M (eds) Edible histories, cultural politics: towards a Canadian food history. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 409–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Muenning P (2008) The body politic: the relationship between stigma and obesity-associated disease. BMC Pub Health 8:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahoney Paquin S (2011) Social justice advocacy in nursing: what is it? How do we get there? Creat Nurs 17(2):63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2015) Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 4th edn. Sage, Los Angeles, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2009) The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 17(5):941–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JH (2009) Structural violence and emotional health: a message from Easington, a former mining community in Northern England. Anthropol Med 16(1):37–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scrinis G (2002) Sorry Marge. Meanjin 61(4):108–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrinis G (2008) On the ideology of nutritionism. Gastronomica 8(1):39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrinis G (2013) Nutritionism: the science and politics of dietary advice. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sears A, Cairns J (2015) A good book, in theory: making sense through inquiry, 3rd edn. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue DW (2010) Microaggressions in everyday life: race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson CR (1998) Clinical social work's contribution: a social justice perspective. Soc Work 43(6):527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylka TL, Annunziato RA, Burgard D, Danielsdottir S, Shuman E, Davis C, Calogero RM (2014) The weight-inclusive versus weight-normative approach to health: evaluating the evidence for prioritizing well-being over weight loss. J Obesity 2014:1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/983495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters K (2012) A national priority: nutrition Canada’s survey and the disciplining of aboriginal bodies, 1964-1975. In: Iacovetta F, Korinek VJ, Epp M (eds) Edible histories, cultural politics: towards a Canadian food history. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 433–451

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2018) Social determinants of health: Key concepts. Available from http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/key_concepts/en/index.html. Accessed 16 April 2018

Further Reading and Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Brady .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Assignments

  1. 1.

    Recall the scenario described early on in this paper in which your view of a situation outside is both focused and also limited by the windows of a house. Generate a list of theories that resonate with your current worldview. How did you come to this way of thinking about the world? What experiences shaped how you see the world around you? What is it about the theories that you chose support and reinforce your worldview? Reflecting on the question asked of you in the preceding chapter, have you changed your way of thinking about the world? Would you have listed the same theories had we asked you this question 5 years ago? Why or why not?

  2. 2.

    Write a short (1–2 pages) reflexive piece in which you discuss the following questions: What do you believe is the role of the dietitian in effecting change related to the issues discussed above? Should dietitians be involved in advocacy and activism? Why or why not? Share your thoughts with a fellow dietitian or classmate. What was their response?

Definition of Keywords and Terms

Anti-oppression:

Anti-oppression is an approach or paradigm that is rooted in ending systemic oppression of all kinds, including, but not limited to, racism, sexism classism, homo- and transphobia, sizeism, and so on.

Axiology:

Axiology is the study of what is valued, or what is considered to be of value. Critical Dietetic axiology comprises the approaches, knowledges, political commitments, and practices that form the central core of Critical Dietetics.

Critical praxis:

Praxis was first defined by scholar-activist Paulo Freire (2012) as “reflection and action directed at the structures to be transformed” (p. 32). For Critical Dietetics, critical praxis comprises the expression of the insights garnered by critical social theory through action for social justice.

Epistemology:

Epistemology is a concept that describes the various ways of understanding what counts as knowledge. There are many epistemologies. Mainstream dietetic knowledge and practice are informed by positivist epistemology which understands knowledge creation as the process of uncovering truths about the world through the scientific method. Critical Dietetics is informed by a post-structural epistemology wherein truth is understood as being in constant flux and knowledge creation as requiring multiple, differently situated perspectives, approaches, and methods.

Intersectionality:

Intersectionality was coined by feminist legal scholar Kimberle Crenshaw (1991) to describe the ways in which the experience of and social structures supporting one form of oppression vary when intersecting with other forms of oppression.

Microaggression:

Microaggressions comprise the subtle everyday intended or unintended acts, such as direct verbal harassment or misrepresentation in the media, that collectively contribute to the social exclusion of oppressed groups.

Reflexivity:

Reflexivity describes a practice wherein one is attentive to and reflects critically upon the situated worldview, values, and knowledge of self and others then questioning how those are informed by power, being moved to act to redress inequities, and seeking again to revise worldview, values, and knowledge of self and others based on reflection on action. Reflexivity is not synonymous with reflection given the process does not end with examining worldview, values, and knowledge; this is only the beginning of an iterative (cyclical) process.

How This Chapter Addresses the Critical Dietetic Framework

This chapter addresses all four elements of the Critical Dietetics framework as outlined in this volume. In elaborating the axiological foundations of Critical Dietetics, this chapter provides an in-depth discussion of the values and political commitments that inform the movement including multidisciplinary and trans-theoretical approaches to understanding nutrition, food, health, and people; critical reflexive praxis; knowledge co-creation that values contributions from clients and their families, communities, and service providers; and social just dietetic practice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brady, J., Gingras, J. (2019). Critical Dietetics: Axiological Foundations. In: Coveney, J., Booth, S. (eds) Critical Dietetics and Critical Nutrition Studies. Food Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03113-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03113-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03112-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03113-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics